In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
4:11-cv-06714
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Winston & Strawn
- Willkie Farr
- Kendall Brill
- Goodwin Procter
- Skadden Arps
- Alioto Law Firm
- White & Case
- Massumi & Consoli
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Dentons
- Paul Hastings
- Vinson & Elkins
- Fox Rothschild
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Wilson Sonsini
- Munger Tolles
- A&O Shearman
- Perkins Coie
- Gibson Dunn
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Hueston Hennigan
- Nedeau Law Firm
- Cravath Swaine
- Faegre Drinker
- Kwun Bhansali
- Miller Wanner
- Kellogg Hansen
- Miller Canfield
- Hagens Berman
- Quinn Emanuel
- King & Spalding
- George Feldman
- Weil Gotshal
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Kaufhold Gaskin
- Bartko Pavia
- Law Offices of Lawrence G. Papale
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Maddin Hauser
- Sheppard Mullin
- Berman Tabacco
- Orrick Herrington
- Saveri & Saveri
- Walker Stevens
- Latham & Watkins
Companies
- Starz LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Apple Inc.
- Epic Games Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Google LLC
- A&E Television Networks LLC
- Spotify Technology SA
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Showtime Networks Inc.
- Valve Corp.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- Playtika Ltd.
- Skype Technologies SA
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 27, 2019
IPhone Users Want Their Own Suit Over App Store 'Monopoly'
Neither app developers nor iPhone users want to face Apple jointly in California federal court with allegations that the technology giant is illegally monopolizing the App Store market, as the consumers argued Wednesday that the U.S. Supreme Court demonstrated how different the groups are.
-
June 26, 2019
App Developers Want Apple Antitrust Suits Kept Separate
Developers accusing Apple of illegally monopolizing the App Store market told a California federal judge on Tuesday that their case is too different from the proposed consumer class action recently kept alive by the U.S. Supreme Court to warrant relating them.
-
June 24, 2019
Apple Looks To Link Developer, Consumer Antitrust Suits
Apple Inc. urged a California federal court Friday to relate a suit from developers accusing the tech giant of monopolizing the distribution of apps on its devices to the consumer case the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on last month.
-
June 20, 2019
After High Court Win, IPhone Users Want New Judge
IPhone users heading back to district court say they want to start fresh with a new judge after the U.S. Supreme Court last month permitted them to bring antitrust claims against Apple Inc.
-
December 02, 2013
Apple Escapes App Store Monopoly Suit
A California federal judge on Monday threw out a case accusing Apple Inc. of illegally monopolizing the market for iPhone apps, ruling the would-be class members lacked standing to sue over the 30 percent commission the company charges developers in its App Store.
-
October 01, 2013
App Store Monopoly Claims Don't Add Up, Apple Says
Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge on Monday to dismiss an iPhone customer class action over the tech giant's alleged illegal monopoly of the iPhone aftermarket through its App Store, arguing the plaintiffs haven't proven their standing to sue Apple instead of the third-party developers.
-
September 06, 2013
IPhone Users Take Another Crack At Monopoly Suit
A group of iPhone users on Thursday renewed class action claims against Apple Inc. in a bid to avoid having its suit dismissed again, adding details to its allegations that the company illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its App Store.
-
August 15, 2013
Apple Dodges IPhone App Store Monopoly Suit
A California federal judge on Thursday threw out iPhone users' class action claims that Apple Inc. illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its app store and demanded a cut of third-party sales, saying the plaintiffs failed to establish standing to sue.
-
March 05, 2013
Apple's App Store Not An Illegal Monopoly, Judge Hears
Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge Tuesday to toss iPhone customers' class claims that the tech giant illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its app store and demanded a cut of third-party sales, arguing that the plaintiffs have failed to show Apple violated antitrust laws.
-
November 05, 2012
Apple Says IPhone Service Monopoly Suit Ignores Court Order
Apple Inc. asked a California federal judge on Friday to dismiss a newly refiled class action claiming it monopolized the aftermarket for iPhone services, arguing that plaintiffs disregarded a court order to add AT&T Mobility LLC as a defendant.