A group of former immigration judges and Board of Immigration Appeals members told a D.C. federal judge that legal services programs for unrepresented detained immigrants that the Trump administration stopped funding help the courts function more efficiently.
The programs at issue — the Legal Orientation Program, the Immigration Court Helpdesk, the Family Group Legal Orientation Program and the Counsel for Children Initiative — help noncitizens understand how the immigration court system works, their role in it and what rights they have, the former judges said in an amicus brief on Monday.
That translates into detained noncitizens needing less guidance from the court, asking for fewer continuances and better articulating why they are entitled to removal relief, lightening the burden on immigration judges, they said.
"These programs have been critical to the fair and efficient functioning of the courts. Terminating them will inevitably make the immigration courts less fair and less efficient," the former jurists said.
Among the programs' benefits, the judges said they speed up immigration court proceedings, and also reduce appeals, in absentia orders and detention expenditures.
The judges moved to file the amicus brief in a suit lodged by Amica Center For Immigrant Rights, Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project and others on Jan. 31. The suit came in response to a stop work order from the DOJ pulling federal funding for the programs, and after the groups were barred from entering immigration detention centers to try to carry on their work anyhow.
The Trump administration agreed to restore access to the immigration detention centers and revoked the stop work order after the groups sued, but the fight continues over the funding for the programs, which was congressionally appropriated.
According to the brief, 67% of detained noncitizens lack attorney representation, and they require the most assistance. The former judges said the DOJ did not take time to understand the value of the programs, suggesting they were halted "without review — or apparent understanding — of their need and efficacy."
The judges said the programs need to be expanded, not reduced, arguing that even a brief suspension of the programs would disrupt the immigration court system and exacerbate the backlog, which stood at roughly 3.6 million cases at the end of 2024.
"We are deeply concerned that an overwhelmed immigration court system is being deprived of the resources and structure it needs to function properly. Eliminating the programs is a step in the wrong direction, burdening immigration judges, reducing efficiency, and limiting due process," the judges said.
Counsel for the former judges did not immediately return a request for comment on Tuesday. Counsel for the groups and the DOJ also did not immediately respond to press inquiries.
The groups are represented by Adina Appelbaum, Samantha Hsieh and Amelia Dagen of the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights and Amer S. Ahmed, Richard W. Mark, Raena Ferrer Calubaquib, Apratim Vidyarthi, Naima L. Farrell, Laura Sturges, Patricia M. Herold, Josiah J. Clarke, Caelin Moriarity Miltko, Mason Stringer, Timoteo J. L'Esperance, Katie Marquart, Arthur M. Halliday and Alexander M. Fischer of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
The federal government is represented by Yaakov M. Roth, Andrew I. Warden and Zachary W. Sherwood of the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Division.
The judges are represented by John R. Jacob of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP.
The case is Amica Center For Immigrant Rights et al. v. United States Department of Justice et al., case number 1:25-cv-00298, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
--Additional reporting by Madeline Lyskawa. Editing by Emily Kokoll.
Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Law360
|The Practice of Law
Access to Justice
Aerospace & Defense
Appellate
Asset Management
Banking
Bankruptcy
Benefits
California
Cannabis
Capital Markets
Class Action
Colorado
Commercial Contracts
Competition
Compliance
Connecticut
Construction
Consumer Protection
Corporate
Criminal Practice
Cybersecurity & Privacy
Delaware
Employment
Energy
Environmental
Fintech
Florida
Food & Beverage
Georgia
Government Contracts
Health
Hospitality
Illinois
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Trade
Legal Ethics
Legal Industry
Life Sciences
Massachusetts
Media & Entertainment
Mergers & Acquisitions
Michigan
Native American
Law360 Pulse
|Business of Law
Law360 Authority
|Deep News & Analysis
Healthcare Authority
Deals & Corporate Governance Digital Health & Technology Other Policy & ComplianceGlobal
- Law360 US
- Law360
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
This article has been saved to your Briefcase
This article has been added to your Saved Articles
Former Immigration Judges Defend Legal Services Programs
By Britain Eakin | March 11, 2025, 5:10 PM EDT · Listen to article