Insurance

Expert Analysis

• Opinion

  Subpoena Defense Cost Ruling Gets Insurance Law Wrong

  

  A Connecticut federal court's recent decision that National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh didn't need to cover defense costs for a power utility's response to a grand jury subpoena included two crucial mistakes that contravene long-standing insurance law principles, say attorneys at Hunton.

• Nursing Homes May See Litigation Spike After 7th Circ. Ruling

  

  The Seventh Circuit’s recent Federal Nursing Home Reform Act ruling in Talevski v. Health and Hospital Corp. opens skilled nursing facilities to federal litigation from private plaintiffs and could require exhaustion of administrative remedies before invoking state or federal court jurisdiction, say Randall Fearnow and Edward Holloran at Quarles & Brady.

• Girardi Scandal Provides Important Ethics Lessons

  

  The litigation and media maelstrom following allegations that famed plaintiffs attorney Thomas Girardi and his law firm misappropriated clients' funds provides myriad ethics and professional responsibility lessons for practitioners, especially with regard to misconduct reporting and liability insurance, says Elizabeth Tuttle Newman at Frankfurt Kurnit.

• Opinion

  No Signs Of Turning, Tide Of Insurer COVID Wins Persists

  

  The trend of COVID-19 business interruption decisions favoring insurers continues to hold strong — any commentary to the contrary is striking a narrative that is not borne out by reality, say attorneys at Dentons.

• Roundup

  Insurance Commissioner's Agenda

  

  State insurance commissioners discuss their enforcement and regulation priorities in this Expert Analysis series.

• Takeaways From DC Circ. Medicare Overpayment Ruling

  

  The D.C. Circuit's recent decision in UnitedHealth v. Becerra, reinstating a rule that requires Medicare Advantage organizations to refund certain overpayments, is a near-complete victory for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, but arguably abandons the rule's negligence standard, say attorneys at Ropes & Gray.

• Series

  Embracing ESG: Jabil GC Talks Compliance Preparation

  

  Tried-and-true compliance lessons from recent decades can be applied to companies’ environmental, social and governance efforts, especially with regard to employee training and consistent application of policies — two factors that can create a foundation for ESG criteria to flourish, says Robert Katz at Jabil.

• 3 Ways CLOs Can Drive ESG Efforts

  

  Chief legal officers are specially trained to see the legal industry's flaws, and they can leverage that perspective to push their companies toward effective environmental, social and governance engagement, says Mark Chandler at Stanford Law School.

• 2 Cases Will Help Shape Opioid Litigation Insurance Coverage

  

  Upcoming decisions from the Ohio and Delaware high courts in Acuity v. Masters Pharmaceutical and Rite Aid Corp. v. ACE American Insurance, respectively, on whether insurers must defend policyholders in prescription opioid litigation filed by government entities are sure to provide precedent for resolution of these coverage issues nationwide, say Courtney Horrigan and Kateri Persinger at Reed Smith.

• Why The Future Of Telehealth Parity Remains Murky

  

  Though the federal government, states and private insurers have united during the pandemic in recognizing the value of expanding telehealth access, there is no consensus on the merits of long-term telehealth parity, say Adriana Riviere-Badell and Alexandria Swette at Kobre & Kim.

• How Law Firms Can Rethink Offices In A Post-Pandemic World

  

  Based on their own firm's experiences, Kami Quinn and Adam Farra at Gilbert discuss strategies and unique legal industry considerations for law firms planning hybrid models of remote and in-office work in a post-COVID marketplace.

• A Primer On DOL Probes For ERISA Plan Service Providers

  

  As the U.S. Department of Labor shifts its enforcement resources from Employee Retirement Income Security Act plan sponsors to financial institutions that service such plans, nonfiduciary providers should know what to expect and how to respond to agency investigations, say attorneys at Groom Law Group.

• 5th Circ. Ruling Aids Policyholder Deductible Calculations

  

  In its recent McDonnel Group v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance decision, the Fifth Circuit held that the policy's flood deductible language was ambiguous, providing a win for policyholders and a helpful mathematical interpretation for insureds with similar deductible language in their property insurance policies, says Tae Andrews at Miller Friel.

• Opinion

  Pa. Lawmakers Must Save Medical Liability Venue Rule

  

  The Pennsylvania Legislature should stop the state's Civil Procedural Rules Committee from rolling back a rule banning medical malpractice forum shopping, to avoid a return to rampant liability claims in high-verdict courts, sky-high insurance premiums for doctors and less public access to care, says Curt Schroder at the Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform.

• Opinion

  5th Circ. Opinion Is Right To Question ERISA Review Norms

  

  A concurrence in the Fifth Circuit’s recent J. P. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas decision rightly criticizes the standard of review in Employee Retirement Income Security Act cases as misplaced, nearly impossible for claimants to meet, and at odds with the holistic assessment required by the U.S. Supreme Court, says Mark DeBofsky at DeBofsky Sherman.