Members of a California tribe have pressed a federal court to hand them a quick win in a development company’s breach of contract suit that claims the tribe lured it into investing $5.38 million in a sham casino project, saying the company misinterpreted the terms of their financial deal.
The Texas Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider whether forum selection clauses are applicable to parties who weren't signees to an agreement in a dispute between former business partners.
A Florida state appeals court ruled Friday that a lower court erred when it applied an exception to a general rule against awarding attorneys' fees incurred litigating the amount of a fees award and made such an award to a homeowner who prevailed in a mortgage foreclosure suit.
A bid to vacate a $9 million costs award issued in a dispute over a $200 million investment deal involving a Chinese real estate developer is a "Hail Mary" based on a "fictitious" account of the underlying arbitration, a pair of venture capital funds argued in California federal court.
A private equity investor urged a skeptical Delaware vice chancellor to order equity-based unjust enrichment damages Friday as compensation for its fraud-tainted acquisition of the former Plimus payment processing business, citing contract caps that will otherwise block most recovery from a $121.5 million claim.
A Lloyd’s of London unit isn’t responsible for covering a developer’s $3.5 million judgment over a subcontractor employee’s death, as a previous settlement with the employee’s parents barred the pursuit of further claims, an Arizona federal judge ruled Friday.
A Pittsburgh security company's long-running dispute with Honeywell International Inc. appeared to have reached a settlement, after a mediator announced the case was resolved Thursday and a Pennsylvania federal court closed the case Friday, court records showed.
A company that helps computer centers maintain uninterrupted power has said it shouldn’t face sanctions or the dismissal of its trade secrets case against a former business partner because any discovery-related issues were at worst due to disorganization and were not “extraordinary in volume and breadth.”
The past week in London has seen Libya's sovereign wealth fund sue Credit Suisse amid a long-running bribery battle, retailer Sports Direct take on its former accountant Grant Thornton, and a host of underwriters file claims against a shipowner and its bank a month after winning a case over a fake pirate attack. Here, Law360 looks at those and other new claims in the U.K.
Missouri-based Stange Law Firm PC imposed an illegal nondisparagement agreement on employees and would have violated federal labor law if it kept pursuing legal action over negative online job reviews, the National Labor Relations Board general counsel’s office said in a new guidance memo.
Ford violated California's lemon law by declining to buy back a Ford Focus after numerous clutch repairs and transmission issues, a California federal jury ruled Thursday in the first verdict to come from nearly 1,000 consolidated federal cases over alleged defects in Focus and Fiesta PowerShift transmissions.
Netflix courted comedian and Oscar-winning actress Mo'Nique for a comedy special, then made her a discriminatory offer that "perpetuated the pay gap suffered by black women," according to a complaint she filed Thursday in California state court.
The Tenth Circuit has rebuffed a request by Three Affiliated Tribes court officials that it rethink a ruling that tribe members' suits seeking royalties for the flaring of natural gas on reservation lands can’t be heard in tribal court, despite the officials’ claims the decision flouted U.S. Supreme Court precedent and trampled on tribal court authority.
A Manhattan federal judge waived off a bid to stall discovery in fraud litigation brought by owners of luxury hotel units in Panama after they argued that President Donald Trump's management companies had violated a previously-agreed-upon pause.
A lawsuit by the founder and ex-CEO of nutrition-infused water startup Wanu Water that alleges a former director plotted his ouster through a defamatory smear campaign is filled with deficient and unsupported claims, a Delaware vice chancellor was told Thursday.
The married couple behind the popular Tieks foldable ballet flat have won a $36.67 million verdict after a weekslong trial against their former business partner, one founder's brother, persuading a Los Angeles jury that the brother breached his fiduciary duty to the company.
An ailing retired NFL player has agreed to pay litigation funder Thrivest $1.25 million to repay a $500,000 loan tied to the NFL concussion settlement, ending a yearslong legal battle and foreshadowing victory for Thrivest in more than 30 similar cases.
Timeshare company Bluegreen Vacations has slapped a Missouri law firm with a false advertising lawsuit in Florida federal court, claiming it can’t legally make good on its promise to help share owners cancel their timeshare contracts.
Two developers and their owners have alleged in North Dakota federal court that a construction company hasn't properly compensated them for subcontracting work done on a project to build a pair of parking garages.
The city of Almaty, Kazakhstan, and one of the country’s banks are urging a New York federal court not to dismiss their suit accusing Felix Sater and others of helping to launder about $440 million.
A New Jersey car dealership called on a state appellate panel Thursday to upend a trial court ruling that the business waived its right to compel arbitration of "hidden fee" class claims under a vehicle order contract after unsuccessfully trying to force arbitration based on a lease agreement.
Restaurant chain Houlihan’s Restaurants Inc. has filed for bankruptcy in Delaware and plans to sell its assets at auction, with rival dining chain operator Landry’s LLC serving as the stalking horse bidder with a $40 million opening bid.
A Chapter 11 creditor told the U.S. Supreme Court Wednesday that its appeal of a bankruptcy court's order denying relief from the automatic stay didn't need to be filed immediately as lower courts had said but could have waited until the Chapter 11 was resolved.
About two-thirds of a certified 2,400-worker class accusing a Dollar Tree unit of wage violations can only pursue their claims in individual arbitration, a California federal judge has ruled.
An Oregon hemp seed company has shot back at a CBD producer suing it over a batch of allegedly nonflowering seeds, filing a $3.7 million claim over an unpaid contract and telling a state court that the grower’s own incompetence was to blame for its ruined crop.
Oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in Comcast v. National Association of African American-Owned Media highlighted the case's flaws, including that it concerns the dismissal of a complaint that omitted a key fact and was tainted by dubious insinuations, says R. Scott Oswald of The Employment Law Group.
It is essential that property owners, contractors and their lawyers understand the key distinctions between warranties and guaranties, and are mindful of these distinctions when drafting and enforcing prime construction contracts or subcontracts, says Michael Scheffler of Blank Rome.
While programs granting a licensing advantage to communities disproportionately impacted by the criminalization of cannabis have gained support in progressive legislative circles, they are failing due to poor legislative design, says Avis Bulbulyan of SIVA Enterprises.
As Texas and other states review their judicial election processes, they would be well served by taking guidance from Massachusetts' Governor’s Council system, which protects the judiciary from the hazards of campaigning, says Richard Baker of New England Intellectual Property.
Reading Jeffrey Rosen’s "Conversations With RBG: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life, Love, Liberty, and Law" is like eavesdropping on the author and his subject while they discuss how the restrained judicial minimalist became the fiery leader of the opposition, says Ninth Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown.
Following the recent release of NCAA student-athlete compensation guidelines, it remains unclear how disparate governing bodies will choose to set rules, leaving student-athletes seeking to commercialize their names, images or likenesses through contracts or trademark rights with a confusing mix of incentives and prohibitions, says Radhika Raman of Knobbe Martens.
After hearing arguments last month, the Texas Supreme Court is poised to decide whether Energy Transfer Partners and Enterprise Products Partners entered into a partnership based on their conduct and statements. The case emphasizes the need to draft preliminary agreements carefully, says Ladd Hirsch of Winstead.
Following the Federal Circuit's recent holding in Inspired Development v. Inspired Products that unjust enrichment claims pertaining to a license agreement did not arise under federal patent law, parties can keep jurisdiction on their side by drafting licensing agreements with an eye toward litigation and carefully selecting claims to assert, say Jeffrey Whittle and Christopher Limbacher of Womble Bond.
Transactional attorneys should consider consulting with litigation counsel when drafting certain contractual provisions — choice of law, choice of forum, attorney fees and others — that could come into play in a broad range of substantive disputes, says Adrienne Koch at Katsky Korins.
Although the California Consumer Privacy Act takes effect in less than two months, one of its key provisions ― the right of California residents to opt out of the sale of their personal information ― remains to be defined or subject to public review or comment, creating uncertainty for businesses, say attorneys at Akin Gump.
Washington and Colorado have come up with disparate regulations for cannabis-related intellectual property transactions, providing an indication of the licensing challenges ahead for attorneys drafting cannabis agreements across state lines, say attorneys at Eversheds Sutherland.
Earlier this year, in Mission Product v. Tempnology, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the issue of naked licenses resulting in trademark abandonment, an outcome that can be avoided if attorneys counseling suppliers address the requisite quality controls in supplier/distributor agreements, says Joseph Sullivan of Taylor English.
Following the Ninth Circuit's recent ruling in Monster Energy v. City Beverages, arbitrators should consider whether to amend disclosures concerning potential conflicts of interest to meet the court's hypertechnical, but not wholly illogical, partiality standard, says Dustin Hecker at Arent Fox.
Replacing hourly billing with flat-fee arrangements, especially for appellate work, will leave attorneys feeling free to spend as much time as necessary to produce their highest quality work, says Lawrence Ebner of Capital Appellate Advocacy.
Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to provide a uniform standard of culpability for spoliation, cases with similar facts are still reaching differing results because the rule does not specify how a court should evaluate a party's intent, say attorneys at Pepper Hamilton.