A coalition of states challenging the Trump administration’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program urged the Second Circuit Thursday to uphold their equal protection and procedural claims, asserting that the government’s arguments to the contrary improperly rely on a recent U.S. Department of Homeland Security memo.
Harvard University asked the First Circuit on Friday to affirm that a former associate anthropology professor failed to prove the prestigious school denied her application for tenure because she is a woman and had voiced support for sexual assault victims.
Fifteen law firms will guide initial public offerings from 13 companies that are expected to raise more than $1.1 billion during the week of Sept. 24, a busy lineup dominated by technology and life sciences firms going public during a sweet spot on the annual IPO calendar.
A Massachusetts driver says Toyota has for years been outfitting vehicles with cost-saving, environmentally friendly electrical insulation that "uniquely attracted" rodents, causing an infestation and extensive damage to his vehicle, which is the subject of a lawsuit in Boston.
In Law360's latest roundup of new actions at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Boston Red Sox talk about New England accents in an effort to shut down a reference to Fenway Park, Discovery Channel picks a fight with Alibaba, and Anheuser-Busch targets a "Bud" mark.
A Massachusetts federal judge on Friday vented her frustration as a man who copped to arranging a $1.6 million pump-and-dump scheme told her hours before he was set to be sentenced that he would not be flying up to Boston for the hearing because he wants to stay in Florida to be with his dying father.
Goodwin Procter LLP says it's the first major law firm in the U.S. to set up a practice group devoted to the intersection of real estate and technology, and co-leaders of Goodwin's so-called PropTech group recently told Law360 their firm is ideally suited to tackle the complex multibillion-dollar intersection of the two practice areas.
A Massachusetts federal magistrate judge has told Anderson & Wanca and Swartz & Swartz PC that they failed to submit sufficient evidence of the firms' expenses that went into striking a $4.75 million deal with Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. to end class action allegations of unsolicited faxes.
A trio of prestigious Massachusetts hospitals will collectively pay almost $1 million to resolve allegations they flouted the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act by disclosing patient information during filming of an ABC documentary series, federal regulators announced Thursday.
A Massachusetts federal judge has thrown out a proposed class action alleging that Enterprise Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries jointly employed assistant branch managers who were misclassified as overtime-exempt.
Shareholders of Dun & Bradstreet on Wednesday filed a proposed class action in Delaware federal court alleging that a proxy statement filed by the company's board in September is "materially incomplete," making shareholders unable to properly assess the fairness and financial implications of its potential $6.9 billion merger with a buying group led by CC Capital.
A family-owned gas station less than 30 miles west of Boston asked a federal judge on Thursday to stop holding company Global Cos. LLC from forcing it to pay $65,000 more per month to lease the station, a day after filing a suit claiming the corporation instituted the rate hike to drive the business from the property.
Medical device maker AngioDynamics Inc. pushed back Wednesday against a competitor’s attempt to toss racketeering claims, arguing in Massachusetts federal court that the competitor is culpable in Biolitec AG’s alleged scheme to avoid paying $145 million in a judgment and contempt fines.
A Massachusetts gynecologist will not spend time behind bars for disclosing her patients’ private medical information to a sales representative at Warner Chilcott, then lying about it to federal agents, a federal judge decided Wednesday after prosecutors recommended she spend nearly two years behind bars.
The maker of a corkscrew pipe popularly used to smoke marijuana has accused Amazon in Massachusetts federal court of infringing a patent on the glass blunt known as Twisty by enabling third-party merchants to sell knockoff versions on the world's most popular retail website.
New Jersey's highest court has disbarred a Massachusetts-based attorney for pocketing $16,250 that was meant for a man who the lawyer has claimed was his business partner and then spending the entire amount in less than two months on his own personal expenses.
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and other generic-drug companies challenging Allergan PLC patents for dry-eye medication Restasis urged the full Federal Circuit on Tuesday not to reconsider an earlier decision that tribal sovereign immunity doesn’t apply in reviews at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
A group of 17 states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in New York federal court Wednesday backing a legal challenge to a decision by President Donald Trump and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to end temporary protected status for Haitians.
The special master appointed to investigate a $75 million attorneys' fee awarded in a $300 million settlement with State Street Corp. has reached a tentative agreement with the lead class counsel, Labaton Sucharow LLP, and Employee Retirement Income Security Act lawyers involved in the case, according to a filing late Tuesday in Massachusetts federal court.
Medical technology developer Channel Medsystems Inc. sued Boston Scientific late Monday in Delaware's Chancery Court, claiming an unjustified breach of a $275 million agreement to buy Channel and its potential breakthrough device for treating heavy menstrual bleeding.
In recent years, businesses have increasingly teamed up with charities to promote products or charitable causes. However, if these campaigns are not executed properly, they can lead to civil and criminal penalties, taxes and bad publicity for all parties involved, says Russell Stein of Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP.
While in-house technology investments on the scale and complexity needed to compete with large firms remain cost prohibitive for small and midsize law firms, cloud-based services offer significant cost savings and productivity gains with little to no capital investment, says Holly Urban of Effortless Legal LLC.
Key performance indicators have been a topic of concern for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for some time, but enforcement actions have been less prevalent. Recent actions coupled with statements by commission officials, however, suggest that KPIs may become more of a focus for the current SEC, say Brooke Clarkson and Jessica Matelis of Foley & Lardner LLP.
With the Milbank/Cravath pay scale once again equalizing compensation at many Am Law 100 firms, there is even more pressure for firms to differentiate themselves to top lateral associate candidates. This presents strategic considerations for both law firms and lateral candidates throughout the recruitment process, says Darin Morgan of Major Lindsey & Africa.
The Massachusetts high court recently found that a shoe manufacturer’s use of a runner’s name potentially triggered advertising injury insurance coverage, even though the name had not acquired secondary meaning or trademark status. The Holyoke v. Vibram decision is notable because of the court's focus on the intent of the athlete's family business, says Gregory May of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP.
In this series featuring law school luminaries, Stanford Law School professor Jeffrey Fisher discusses his motivation for teaching, arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court and what the court might look like if Judge Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed.
The first comprehensive overhaul of California's Rules of Professional Conduct in nearly 30 years becomes operational on Nov. 1. Some of the new rules mirror the model language used by the American Bar Association, but many continue to reflect California’s unique approach to certain ethical questions, says Mark Loeterman of Signature Resolution LLC.
The balancing act between protecting attorneys’ speech rights and ensuring unbiased adjudications was highlighted recently in two cases — when Michael Cohen applied for a restraining order against Stephanie Clifford's attorney, and when Johnson & Johnson questioned whether a Missouri talc verdict was tainted by public statements from the plaintiffs' counsel, says Matthew Giardina of Manning Gross & Massenburg LLP.
In this monthly series, Amanda Brady of Major Lindsey & Africa interviews management from top law firms about the increasingly competitive business environment. Here we feature Melanie Green, chief client development officer at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.
Because current state laws relating to marijuana-impaired driving lack an objective impairment standard, only those who clearly demonstrate impaired driving are likely to be prosecuted and convicted, says Ian Stewart of Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP.