Retired Justice John Paul Stevens died Tuesday at age 99. Here Law360 looks at the former U.S. Supreme Court justice’s legacy — not just through his legal work, but in his mentoring of clerks and friendships with peers.
The D.C. Circuit Friday affirmed the National Labor Relations Board’s finding that a multinational corn starch manufacturing company committed a slew of labor violations at an Iowa corn processing plant by denigrating its union, dealing directly with employees, and threatening job losses.
New Hampshire state regulators were within their authority to reject Eversource Energy's proposal for the primary portion of a $1.6 billion power line project intended to ship Canadian hydroelectricity to Massachusetts, the state's Supreme Court held Friday.
The D.C. Circuit declined Friday to reclassify its decision shooting down Ukraine’s sovereign immunity defense in an enforcement action, rejecting a request by a London-based asset manager that is trying to enforce a €128 million ($143.8 million) arbitral award against Spain in a separate suit.
The Fourth Circuit on Friday threw out a removal order against a U.S. green card holder convicted of gang participation, finding the Virginia anti-gang law he violated covers lesser offenses, like trespassing, that do not merit deportation.
A Mexican cement company has urged the Tenth Circuit to reverse the confirmation of a $36.1 million arbitral award in favor of a Bolivian investment firm, saying the Colorado federal court lacked jurisdiction over the Mexican parties and should never have enforced the award.
A Pennsylvania appellate panel on Friday affirmed a jury’s decision to award $3.5 million in a suit accusing a hospital of failing to timely diagnose a man’s heart disease, saying certain medical expert testimony was not required.
The Fifth Circuit on Thursday let stand a deportation order against a Haitian man with schizophrenia, saying a judge had properly followed necessary safeguards during his immigration proceedings.
TD Bank has convinced the New Jersey Supreme Court to review a ruling that a dentist may pursue a claim against the financial institution under the state's Uniform Fiduciaries Law for allowing his then-employees to fraudulently deposit into their accounts checks that were issued to him and his practice.
The Eleventh Circuit has said it will not stop an Alabama city from using traffic cameras to penalize drivers who run red lights, dismissing a lawsuit challenging the policy for reasons that differ from an Alabama district court's.
The Federal Circuit on Thursday said it would not consider an appeal in a battle between paper manufacturers concerning who invented a patent covering a process for using ultrasound to dry paper during manufacturing.
A group of scientists told the First Circuit a lower court wrongly signed off on a Trump administration directive that bars scientists from its advisory committees who receive U.S. Environmental Protection Agency grants, saying it violates the Administrative Procedure Act.
The Seventh Circuit should reject attempts to cut the legs off a rule blocking indirect purchasers from suing a manufacturer for antitrust violations, the Washington Legal Foundation told the court, which is considering antitrust claims from buyers of syringes and catheters who think they were forced to pay too much.
Since being sworn in as a U.S. Supreme Court justice in 2017, Justice Neil Gorsuch has already penned several significant opinions for the high court. But on Thursday, a very different piece of his writing drew the attention of thousands online — a letter he sent to a law student who had asked for his advice.
The Federal Circuit on Friday revived two California water districts' case over hexavalent chromium contamination allegedly stemming from a local U.S. Air Force base, saying a lower court had misclassified their claims as a regulatory taking dispute instead of a physical taking case.
A Pennsylvania appeals court ruled Friday that an ambulatory surgical center owned by an Excela Health hospital in Westmoreland County did not qualify for an exemption from property taxes because it could not be considered a "hospital" in and of itself.
Two South Carolina utility customers on Friday asked the Second Circuit to revive a suit against Westinghouse Electric Co. to recover payments made for an abandoned nuclear project, saying their claims arise from Westinghouse’s post-Chapter 11 acts.
The D.C. Circuit on Friday upheld the Trump administration's move to kill an Obama-era proposal that would have required hardrock mining facilities to prove they can pay for cleanup efforts, rejecting arguments by environmental groups that the decision flouted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
The more than 1,000 opinions the late Justice John Paul Stevens authored during his three-plus decades on the U.S. Supreme Court included seminal rulings on punitive damages awards and maritime wrongful death cases. Here, Law360 looks back at a handful of opinions he wrote that have affected the personal injury bar and changed the way trial attorneys practice law.
The Federal Trade Commission has fired back against efforts by Qualcomm and the U.S. Department of Justice to pause a blockbuster antitrust ruling forcing the chipmaker to retool its business model, arguing that reining in Qualcomm’s anti-competitive conduct outweighs any vague national security concerns the pair alluded to.
The Second Circuit ruled Friday that New York City's practice of summarily suspending licenses for taxi drivers who've been arrested but not yet convicted deprives them of due process by denying them meaningful opportunities to challenge their suspensions.
The late Justice John Paul Stevens made use of his antitrust roots frequently during his tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court, penning more than two dozen majority opinions and dissents that helped shape modern antitrust law.
The federal government has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm the Third Circuit’s determination that the one-year time limit for launching Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuits starts when the alleged wrongdoing occurs, not when it is discovered.
The Seventh Circuit on Thursday upheld a five-year sentence for an Illinois chiropractor found guilty of health care fraud, saying he failed to show evidence of an error that could have gotten him a lighter sentencing recommendation.
A New York state appellate court has upheld a jury verdict in favor of a Hudson Valley hospital in a suit brought by the family of a deceased hip replacement patient, saying the trial came down to a battle of experts and the verdict was reasonable.
The Florida Supreme Court declined to take up the appeal of a decision overturning a $46.5 million verdict for a now-deceased smoker in an Engle progeny trial against R.J. Reynolds.
A new and controversial justice. A growing number of dissents. Fights over precedent. The reality of Chief Justice John Roberts' new court proved more complicated than expected. Here, Law360 takes you on a deep dive of the last session.
With more judicial vacancies at the start of his term than any president in the past three decades, President Donald Trump has an unusual opportunity to reshape the federal judiciary. Here is Law360's comprehensive guide to the nominations.
In a series of exclusive interviews with Law360, current and former Supreme Court justices discussed topics as varied as the president’s wartime powers, their own decision-making process, the confirmation of the court’s newest member, and the void left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.
After last month's U.S. Supreme Court decision in Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Bensiek, holding that partisan gerrymandering claims present a political question outside the reach of federal courts, state courts will likely see increased litigation attempting to strike down gerrymandered districts, say Junaid Odubeko and Mike Stephens of Bradley Arant.
The fate of the Affordable Care Act is currently pending in federal court, but states are proceeding on the premise that the law will survive its latest legal challenge as they consider competing Democratic and Republican visions of health care, says Lou Cannon of State Net Capitol Journal.
Although the U.S. Supreme Court's recent admiralty ruling in Air & Liquid Systems v. DeVries indicates success in expanding the availability of common law protections to mariners, its decision in Dutra Group v. Batterton — decided just months later — counsels that new classes of remedies will now be harder to obtain under the common law, says Brian Maloney of Seward & Kissel.
The Federal Circuit's July 16 decision in Bechtel National v. United States upholds the precedent set in Geren v. Tecom, making it harder for contractors to argue government agencies indicated their willingness to reimburse them for third-party litigation expenses through contract terms, say attorneys at Arnold & Porter.
Justice John Paul Stevens was right that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2008 gun rights decision in Heller desperately needs to be overruled, but while he viewed revision or repeal of the Second Amendment as the easier course for correction, only the court can clean up the mess it made, says Robert Ludwig of the American Enlightenment Project.
The First Circuit's decision in Sterngold Dental v. HDI Global Insurance clarifies the treatment of the intellectual property exclusion to personal and advertising injury coverage under the standard commercial general liability form, bypassing the need to determine whether a trademark is an advertising idea, say Bryon Friedman and Robert Joyce of Littleton Park.
Following recent rule changes, U.S. International Trade Commission determinations and decisions by the Federal Circuit, proposed respondents may be able to prevent or limit the scope of ITC Section 337 investigations if they act quickly using various types of preinstitution submissions, says Michael Doane of Miles & Stockbridge.
Rothschild Barry's John Coffey, who joined Justice John Paul Stevens' law firm in 1965, shares what it was like to watch Justice Stevens practice law, mentor younger lawyers and land a malfunctioning plane.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 SAS Institute v. Iancu decision has had subtle effects on Patent Trial and Appeal Board inter partes review institution practice. Understanding these nuances can help practitioners to alter their strategy and tactics to achieve the desired outcome on IPR petitions, say Tyler Bowen and Emily Greb of Perkins Coie.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Gundy v. United States may have opened the door to a revitalization of the long-dormant nondelegation doctrine. Such a shift could make it difficult for a future administration to deal with climate change without congressional action, say William McGrath and Jeffrey Jay of Brownstein Hyatt.
Although an appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court is pending, if the New Jersey Appellate Division's recent decision in Gourmet Dining v. Union Township stands, it may prove to be a watershed moment for property tax jurisprudence in the state by broadening the definition of "public purpose" to potentially include private, for-profit use of property, says Carl Rizzo of Cole Schotz.
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Kisor v. Wilkie, weakening Auer deference, gives courts more authority to challenge agency decisions — even those concerning very technical regulations, as many of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's do, say attorneys at Axinn.
While there is discussion in some quarters about new regulations on commercial legal finance, the hands-off approach taken by the majority of courts and legislatures is an implicit recognition that it is already sufficiently regulated, says Danielle Cutrona of Burford Capital.
A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit took an expansive view of equitable tolling of statutory filing deadlines and has potentially far-reaching ramifications for the U.S. Tax Court’s power to grant equitable relief, says Laura Gavioli at McDermott.
A recent Iowa Supreme Court ruling concerning a local airport commission's authority to condemn a structure declared safe by the Federal Aviation Administration presents many of the same preemption questions that will play out in opioid litigation, says Richard Dean of Tucker Ellis.