The Supreme Court appears to have filled up its docket through the remainder of the 2018-2019 term, meaning that October is likely the earliest time it can hear a host of high-profile appeals related to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, Title VII protections for LGBTQ employees, and more.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday nudged Voltstar Technologies to respond to a cert petition aiming to clarify whether inter partes reviews can be filed a year after an infringement suit is voluntarily dismissed and whether institution of those reviews can be appealed.
A Texas appeals court on Thursday trimmed a $4.4 million award down to $4.2 million in a suit accusing a motorist of negligently hitting a motorcyclist and causing his death, saying the bulk of the award was supported by the evidence.
A nurse accused of failing to properly monitor a patient who died from an allergic reaction to a medication she administered can’t escape a malpractice suit solely because the man’s widow didn’t learn her name until late in the game, a New Jersey appellate court said Thursday.
An Illinois bank that has been trying for five years to undo what it says was a $4.9 million overpayment for a foreclosed property had its latest attempt shot down by a state appeals court on Wednesday.
The plaintiffs bar is applauding the U.S. Supreme Court's choice this week to leave intact a Sixth Circuit decision that endorses a little-used path to class certification, a ruling experts say is likely to result in more successful class actions, especially toxic torts, across the country.
A D.C. Circuit panel on Thursday scrutinized a UPS subsidiary's claim that the National Labor Relations Board rushed a unionization vote for a few dozen of the delivery company's Pennsylvania-based truck drivers without giving the company a chance to make its case against the drive.
The Second Circuit tossed the marriage fraud convictions of two Indian nationals and an American woman, ruling Thursday that they didn’t get a fair trial because the judge had a solo meeting with some of the jurors and gave the entire jury an inappropriate instruction.
The Ninth Circuit on Thursday upheld a lower court’s order tossing a suit that claimed California wasn’t allowed to put expiration dates on its gaming agreements with tribes, saying that negotiating such dates is permitted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
The city of San Jose and immigrant advocates urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to hear their constitutional claims against the inclusion of a citizenship status question on the 2020 census, suggesting that the court consolidate their case with one brought by New York and other states.
The General Counsel's Office for the U.S. House of Representatives has added a former U.S. Department of Justice appellate attorney, another potential sign House Democrats are gearing up for legal battles with President Donald Trump.
Spirit Airlines told the Second Circuit on Thursday that federal law preempts a proposed class action alleging it defrauded consumers by concealing its carry-on bag fees on tickets sold through other online travel agents, saying passengers cannot invent and force a disclosure obligation.
A New York appellate panel has rejected a sportscaster’s age discrimination claims against his former boss Don Imus, finding they don't jibe with state human rights laws because the ex-employee was working in Florida when he was fired.
Workers without direct proof for their job discrimination claims don’t have a case unless they’re similar in every relevant way to the colleagues they say received better treatment, a majority of the full Eleventh Circuit said Thursday in a lengthy ruling rejecting a fired Georgia cop’s race and sex bias claims.
The Fifth Circuit has asked the Texas Supreme Court to analyze whether changes in the way retirees can access money from certain deferred accounts they hold as part of the Dallas Police and Fire Pension System flouted the state’s constitution.
A former Anheuser-Busch employee cannot escape the brewer’s trade secret suit accusing him of stealing beer recipes and passing them on to class action attorneys looking to sue the company over allegedly watered-down beer, the Ninth Circuit ruled Wednesday.
An Eighth Circuit panel on Thursday handed Honeywell International Inc. a win in a proposed Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action, giving the company the go-ahead to cut off health care benefits for a group of Minnesota workers who retired before age 65.
The Federal Circuit on Thursday upheld a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision invalidating a claim of a hybrid vehicle patent owned by Paice LLC, rejecting the tech company's contention that the board wrongly relied on inconsistent testimony from Ford Motor Co.'s expert.
A former worker who hit Oracle Inc. with a putative class action over sales commission pay can send the dispute to arbitration, a Ninth Circuit panel said Thursday, noting that the case put the tech titan in the atypical position of fighting against arbitrating employment matters.
Two Second Circuit judges voiced skepticism on Thursday about the government's opposition to an admitted wire fraudster's request that his sentence be reduced because he later helped put six co-conspirators behind bars, expressing concern with the notion that they couldn't check the lower court's work for errors.
Illinois circuit courts lack jurisdiction to hear the city of Chicago’s claims that municipalities shorted it tax revenue by sourcing transactions in a manner that subjected them to sales tax instead of use tax, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
With more judicial vacancies at the start of his term than any president in the past three decades, President Donald Trump has an unusual opportunity to reshape the federal judiciary. Here is Law360's comprehensive guide to the nominations.
The latest term ended with a bang with Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement, but the cases themselves packed a punch this term. With the Supreme Court back at full strength, the docket was loaded with issues that divided the nine justices. Here, Law360 takes a look at the oddest voting lineups, the juiciest dissents and the best oral argument moments from a contentious session.
In a series of exclusive interviews with Law360, current and former Supreme Court justices discussed topics as varied as the president’s wartime powers, their own decision-making process, the confirmation of the court’s newest member, and the void left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.
The Fourth Circuit’s recent opinion in Parker v. Reema Consulting Services demonstrates how even an office rumor can give rise to Title VII liability, and may be indicative of a judiciary moving toward a more sympathetic approach to women's workplace discrimination claims, says Kathryn Barcroft of Solomon Law Firm PLLC.
The U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous ruling on Wednesday in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP removes nearly all activities taken by creditors seeking nonjudicial foreclosure of liens and mortgages from the ambit of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, says John Baxter of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP.
Trial counsel’s contribution to the virtual law team throughout the life cycle of a mass tort litigation rests in the key skill of viewing the case through the eyes of the ultimate audience for the defense, the jury, say attorneys at Covington & Burling LLP and Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.
These days, a popular theme in media is that lawyers' jobs will be taken by robots. However, based on the tech issues discussed at the South by Southwest technology conference in Austin, Texas, last month, robots may in fact need lawyers, says Nick Abrahams of Norton Rose Fulbright.
Last week, the Texas Supreme Court reached opposite conclusions in two sovereign immunity cases, reflecting the excruciating parsing of statutory text required to determine whether a claim against a local government is barred or is encompassed by a statutory waiver of immunity, says Lyndon Bittle at Carrington Coleman Sloman & Blumenthal LLP.
When the issue of the per se rule for criminal Sherman Act trials reaches the U.S. Supreme Court in the near future, the justices will take different approaches, but the rule will fall, says former federal prosecutor Robert Connolly.
The U.S. Supreme Court's recent unanimous decisions in Rimini Street v. Oracle and Fourth Estate v. Wall-Street.com clarify terms in the Copyright Act that have been misconstrued for decades, say Alain Villeneuve and Evan Muller of Duane Morris LLP.
In Cassidy v. China Vitamins, the Illinois Supreme Court overturned previous interpretations of Illinois law that shielded nonmanufacturer defendants in strict product liability cases. Distributors and retailers may now find it useful to take a hard look at the value of their relationships with lawsuit-prone foreign manufacturers, says Symone Shinton of Greenberg Traurig LLP.
You passed the bar exam and are ready for the character and fitness committee interview. Time to think about how to discuss that minor incident in college, that misdemeanor in high school or that mental health issue that you have totally under control, says Richard Maltz of Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC.
One year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Cyan Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, upheld concurrent state and federal jurisdiction over Securities Act class actions. Predictions that plaintiffs would inundate state courts with such claims now appear to be coming true, say James Goldfarb and Gaurav Talwar of Murphy & McGonigle PC.