In a public meeting in Washington, D.C., the panel voted unanimously to adopt the inflationary measure, as well as amendments to streamline the process for dealing with multiple counts, to eliminate over two dozen rarely used offense characteristics and to emphasize the full range of sentencing options in the guidelines.
The newly enacted amendments — which take effect Nov. 1, absent any intervening action by Congress — did not include a number of largely more ambitious proposals under consideration for this amendment cycle that were initially floated by commissioners.
Those proposed amendments included the addition of new paths for offenders to get credit for presentence rehabilitative efforts, increased availability of sentences with non-incarceratory components, a restructuring of the loss table for economic crimes, the elimination of the sophisticated means enhancement, and a new guideline designed to account for the noneconomic harm suffered by victims of white collar crimes.
The advisory federal sentencing guidelines are essentially a mathematical formula used to determine a defendant's base offense level, adjustments for mitigating or aggravating circumstances and criminal history, which typically yields a recommended range of prison time. The amount of pecuniary loss from the offense is usually the most consequential figure for white collar offenders.
The inflationary adjustment amendment tweaks the monetary tables in the guidelines that apply to different economic crimes, as well as the tables outlining fine ranges for individuals and organizations. The last adjustment to the guidelines to account for inflation took effect in late 2015.
As was the case with the 2015 adjustment, the new inflationary adjustment is based on a multiplier derived from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index, and, among other things, it increases the monetary thresholds required for each of the 16 levels of the loss table.
For example, a defendant convicted of an offense with a loss amount of more than $550,000 but less than $1.5 million would currently receive a 14-point enhancement to the base offense level. Under the loss table as amended, a defendant's offense would have to involve a loss of more than $750,000 but less than $2 million to receive the same 14-point enhancement.
One of the proposals that was not adopted by the commission would have restructured the loss calculation formula by eliminating half of the 16 tiers of the loss table. According to data compiled by the commission based on sentences handed down in fiscal year 2024, the combination of the inflation adjustment and that restructured loss calculation formula would have affected 66% of people sentenced under the relevant guidelines had the proposed amendments been in place for that year.
As for the new sentencing options amendment, the commission says it is designed to "more clearly delineate" the available sentencing options for offenders, particularly those people who are eligible for alternative forms of punishment, including probation and different combinations of prison, probation and alternative forms of confinement.
The amendment adds introductory commentary to the relevant section in the guidelines manual and spells out the sentencing options more prominently ahead of the official sentencing table — which lists four categories of offenders and their eligibility for different kinds of sentences — including so-called split sentences that include incarceratory and non-incarceratory components.
It's a departure from a more consequential restructuring of the sentencing table considered by the commission that would have increased the number of offenders eligible for split-sentences.
In addition to the other two amendments regarding multiple counts of conviction and the elimination of more than two dozen specific offense characteristics that are rarely or infrequently applied, the commission also voted to implement congressionally mandated changes to account for fentanyl-related substances in drug sentencings and floated a proposal to implement newly mandated guidelines increases for all offenses involving the use of drones.
Of the proposals that didn't make the cut, the measure that perhaps would have had the most impact was a directive for judges to consider a downward adjustment to a defendant's offense level for certain post-offense efforts at rehabilitation undertaken prior to sentencing.
As it stands now, the guidelines give relatively little incentive for positive, rehabilitative presentence behavior, beyond the acceptance of responsibility or the provision of substantial assistance to authorities, though it's not uncommon for defense attorneys to urge judges to take such behavior into account when weighing the so-called 3553(a) factors, a broad list of considerations judges are instructed to consider, outside the guidelines calculation process.
The commission, chaired by U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves of the Southern District of Mississippi, currently has five voting members, with two empty seats.
--Editing by Linda Voorhis.
For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.
