Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
December 18, 2014
In Re: Barclays Liquidity Cross and High Frequency Trading Litigation
Case Number:
1:14-md-02589
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- ArentFox Schiff
- Baker Botts
- Bottini & Bottini
- Cotchett Pitre
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
- Dentons
- Gibson Dunn
- Glancy Prongay
- JFB Legal
- Labaton Keller
- Levine Lee
- Lovell Stewart
- Milbank LLP
- Motley Rice
- Pomerantz LLP
- Robbins Geller
- Saxena White
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Williams & Connolly
- Wolf Popper
- Zamansky LLC
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
July 26, 2019
Exchanges Back To 'Flash Boys' Battle After Appeal Bid Loss
After losing a bid to have the Second Circuit review the case, a group of major U.S. stock exchanges is back to denying market manipulation claims in litigation inspired by the high-frequency trading exposé "Flash Boys."
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login