Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
United States of America et al v. Fluor Corporation Inc et al
Case Number:
6:13-cv-02428
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Bluestein Nichols
- Bluestein Thompson
- Cassidy Coates Price PA
- Covington & Burling
- Eppes & Plumblee
- Gallivan White
- Loevy & Loevy
- Maynard Nexsen
- Richard A. Harpootlian PA
- Robinson Bradshaw
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 13, 2024
Fluor Fights FCA's Legality In Bid To Escape Fraud Suit
Fluor Corp. pressed the South Carolina federal court to knock out a False Claims Act suit by former military officers, arguing that the law supporting the entire case unconstitutionally vests private citizens with government powers.
-
January 22, 2024
Fluor Suit Relators Say FCA Was Never Ruled Unconstitutional
Former military officers accusing Fluor Corp. of having defrauded the U.S. military in a massive logistics support contract countered Fluor's contention that they can't sue it on the government's behalf, saying that no court has ever made such a ruling.
-
December 20, 2023
Top Government Contract Cases Of 2023: Year In Review
Courts have decided a number of consequential cases affecting government contractors this year, including the Federal Circuit overhauling its jurisdictional jurisprudence and a Texas federal judge once again questioning the scope of the president's procurement authority. Here, Law360 explores several of the top government contracts-related rulings in 2023.
-
December 14, 2023
US Chamber Calls Relators 'Bounty Hunters' In Fluor FCA Suit
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is backing Fluor Corp. in fighting accusations that it defrauded the U.S. military in a massive support contract for bases in Afghanistan, saying it was unconstitutional for former military officers to sue Fluor on the government's behalf.