Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Graham v. Famous Daves of America, Inc.
Case Number:
1:19-cv-00486
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
July 18, 2024
Famous Dave's Attys Can't Score Extra Fees In $1M Tip Deal
Attorneys representing workers for Famous Dave's can't get additional fees from funds left over from a settlement resolving claims that the restaurant chain violated tip regulations, a Maryland federal judge ruled Thursday, saying the workers' counsel have already received enough money.
-
June 11, 2024
Attys Must Justify Bid For Extra Fees From Tip Deal Leftovers
The attorneys representing workers accusing restaurant chain Famous Dave's of violating tip regulations will need to justify why they are trying to get a portion of unclaimed funds in an almost $1 million deal, a Maryland federal judge ruled.
-
December 12, 2022
Workers Finalize $1M Wage Deal With Famous Dave's
A Maryland federal judge on Monday finalized a nearly $1 million settlement between Famous Dave's and workers who accused the barbecue chain of violating tip regulations, with more than $331,000 provided for the workers' attorneys.
-
August 22, 2022
Famous Dave's Workers' $1M Wage Deal Gets Initial OK
Famous Dave's will pay nearly $1 million to a group of workers who claimed the barbecue chain violated tip regulations, a Maryland federal judge said Monday, giving the deal the initial OK but saying some details will be needed for final approval.
-
July 29, 2022
Famous Dave's Workers Re-Up Bid To OK $1M Wage Deal
Barbecue restaurant chain Famous Dave's of America Inc. and a group of workers resumed their bid to secure approval of a nearly $1 million settlement to resolve class and collective tip-credit wage claims that a Maryland federal judge previously rejected as too vague to scrutinize.
-
April 12, 2022
$1M Famous Dave's Tips Deal Paused As More Info Sought
A nearly $1 million deal between Famous Dave's workers in Maryland and the barbecue chain resolving claims the restaurants violated tip regulations doesn't have enough details to determine whether the payout is reasonable, a federal judge said, keeping the deal from moving forward for now.