Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
McCarter and English LLP v. Jarrow Formulas, Inc
Case Number:
3:19-cv-01124
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Barton LLP
- FordHarrison
- McCarter & English
- McElroy Deutsch
- Natale & Wolinetz
- Pullman & Comley
- Renehan & Rossetti
- Szilagyi & Daly
- Trif & Modugno
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 29, 2024
Firm, Ex-Client Brief Conn. High Court In Punitive Award Case
McCarter & English LLP and ex-client Jarrow Formulas Inc. are weighing in as the Connecticut Supreme Court decides whether a federal court can award law firms punitive damages in suits for breach of contract, as the firm seeks a punitive payout after winning multimillion-dollar judgments in a contract dispute.
-
May 08, 2024
Conn. Justices To Hear McCarter & English Damages Demand
The Connecticut Supreme Court has accepted a certified question from a federal district court judge in McCarter & English LLP's yearslong fee feud with a former client, agreeing to decide whether the firm can recover punitive damages after years chasing Jarrow Formulas Inc. and winning a jury verdict last year.
-
April 02, 2024
McCarter & English's Client Contract Win Heads To Mediation
The law firm McCarter & English LLP will hold settlement talks in June with an ex-client who has already lost a jury trial over $2 million in unpaid legal bills and potentially faces $3.6 million in punitive damages after an anticipated decision by Connecticut's highest court, a federal magistrate judge ruled Tuesday.
-
March 28, 2024
McCarter & English Wins Extra $1.8M In Client Billing Suit
A Connecticut federal judge has found that McCarter & English LLP is entitled to another $1.8 million on top of the $1.85 million it has already been granted as a prejudgment remedy in a contract dispute, saying the former client on the hook for the award must also disclose assets under oath that could support the total $3.65 million award.
-
February 29, 2024
McCarter & English Wants Ex-Client To Cough Up Extra $1.8M
McCarter & English LLP on Thursday asked a federal judge in Connecticut to hike a prejudgment remedy order against a former client by $1.8 million, which would nearly double the original remedy of $1.85 million, arguing that interest on subsequent jury awards continues to add up as the dispute spills from federal court to the Connecticut Supreme Court.
-
February 23, 2024
Judge Nixes McCarter & English Client's Relief Bid In Fee Row
A Connecticut federal judge rejected a bid for Second Circuit relief from a supplement company that lost a billing battle with its former lawyers at McCarter & English LLP, concluding Friday that the Connecticut Supreme Court should offer guidance on whether state law allows punitive damages awards in contract disputes.
-
February 09, 2024
Conn. Justices Asked To Rule On McCarter Damages Dispute
A Connecticut federal judge has granted McCarter & English LLP more than $680,000 in prejudgment interest after the firm's victory on claims a former client refused to pay legal fees in an underlying suit.
-
December 21, 2023
Top Connecticut Cases Of 2023
Courts in Connecticut rebuffed some major government and financial institutions in 2023, ruling against federal prosecutors in a high-profile criminal antitrust case against an RTX Corp. unit and sending Deutsche Bank AG back to the drawing board to pursue an enormous, decade-old judgment.
-
November 08, 2023
McCarter & English Wants $6.8M, Skewers Ex-Client's Words
In a filing seeking interest and punitive damages, McCarter & English LLP lambasted the "exceptional use of pejoratives" in former client Jarrow Formulas Inc.'s attempt to avoid high rate calculations in a $6.8 million fee dispute the firm decisively won after a jury trial.
-
October 18, 2023
McCarter & English Urges Judge To Reject Ex-Client's Retrial
A California dietary supplement company should not receive a new trial following a million-dollar loss before a Connecticut federal jury on breach of contract claims brought by its former counsel, McCarter & English LLP, the firm told the court, arguing issues contained in the retrial bid were already heard.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →