Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Rogers v. Lyft, Inc.
Case Number:
3:20-cv-01938
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
April 07, 2020
Calif. Lyft Drivers Lose Employee Status Bid Amid Outbreak
A California federal judge on Tuesday rejected a bid by Lyft Inc. drivers to immediately classify them as employees eligible for sick leave amid the coronavirus pandemic and sent the case to arbitration, while the company argued that a similar effort underway in Massachusetts could jeopardize drivers' rights to generous benefits flowing from federal relief legislation.
-
April 03, 2020
Lyft Ordered To Tell Judge What It's Doing About COVID-19
A California federal judge ordered Lyft Inc. to provide detailed information about its efforts to help drivers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic Friday, a day after he called out the ride-hailing company's disregard for the law and questioned whether Lyft drivers were using the crisis "as a hook to get a court ruling."
-
April 02, 2020
Judge Wonders If Lyft Drivers Using Crisis To Get Reclassified
Lyft is disregarding California law by misclassifying drivers as independent contractors, a California federal judge said Thursday over an emergency request to require the ride-hailing company to designate drivers as employees, which would make them eligible for sick pay. But he questioned whether drivers were using the COVID-19 pandemic "as a hook to get a court ruling."