MULTIPLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. UNDER ARMOUR, INC

  1. August 25, 2026

    No Partial Appeal Before Trial For Ex-Under Armour Supplier

    A Pennsylvania federal judge won't pause a November trial for tortious interference claims against Under Armour so a former supplier can appeal the dismissal of its antitrust claims, the court said Tuesday.

  2. August 20, 2026

    Under Armour Fights Ex-Supplier's Bid For Antitrust Appeal

    Under Armour wants to keep moving toward a November trial for an ex-supplier's tortious interference claims, arguing that a request to pause the case for an immediate appeal of trimmed antitrust allegations rested on the slim chance the Third Circuit would reverse dismissal of those claims.

  3. August 14, 2026

    Ex-Under Armour Ally Wants Pause For Appeal Of Cut Claims

    Textile supplier Multiple Energy Technologies asked a Pennsylvania federal judge to pause the trial on its trimmed-down case against Under Armour, arguing in a brief that the Third Circuit should decide an appeal of the partial dismissal before the district court moves ahead.

  4. July 13, 2026

    Under Armour Beats Most Claims In Ex-Supplier's Suit

    Athletic apparel company Under Armour dodged claims that its marketing of bioceramic powder products as FDA-approved cost its former business partner money, with a Pennsylvania federal judge ruling Monday that there was no obvious link between the statements and the plaintiffs' losses.

  5. November 15, 2024

    Wilson Sonsini Atty To Produce Docs In Under Armour Row

    Emails sent by a Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati attorney to employees of a Pittsburgh-area minor league baseball team he co-owns are not covered by attorney-client privilege and should be provided to Under Armour as part of discovery in an antitrust suit filed against the sports apparel giant, a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled this week.

  6. August 20, 2024

    Under Armour Looks To End Case From Ex-Supplier

    Under Armour Inc. asked a Pennsylvania federal court to end a former supplier's claims that it blocked competition for recovery-enhancing clothing, saying the company is not a competitor and has no evidence supporting its antitrust or other claims.

  7. December 15, 2022

    Under Armour Backs Wilson Sonsini Atty 'Investor' Subpoena

    Under Armour denied any intent to "harass" a Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC attorney for his role representing antitrust foe Multiple Energy Technologies, arguing in Pennsylvania federal court that the sporting apparel giant properly subpoenaed the attorney for his role as "a significant investor" in MET.

  8. December 01, 2022

    Wilson Sonsini Atty Blasts Under Armour Docs 'Harassment'

    A Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC attorney accused Under Armour of harassing him and the firm on Wednesday, seeking to quash a subpoena in an antitrust case the sportswear giant says is based not on his work for plaintiff Multiple Energy Technologies but his partial ownership in it.

  9. June 23, 2022

    Under Armour Wants Proof Antitrust Litigant Is A Competitor

    Athletic clothing maker Under Armour told a Pennsylvania federal court that a company suing it over alleged anti-competitive behavior in the bioceramic "recovery enhancing" apparel market must produce evidence that the plaintiff actually makes the clothing in question, not just one component of the fabric.

  10. February 04, 2022

    Textile Co. Finally Lands Hit In Round 3 Of Under Armour Row

    A textile manufacturer has finally hit upon the right definition of the "recovery-enhancing bioceramics" market that activewear giant Under Armour Inc. has allegedly muscled it out of, a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled.