Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
L. et al v. Newell Brands Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:23-cv-00803
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 11, 2025
Conn. High Court Won't OK Claims Of Relational Loss Of Child
The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that state law does not recognize a cause of action for loss of filial consortium, answering a question from a federal judge who was overseeing a product liability case against Target Stores Inc. and the maker of an infant car seat that caught fire, severely injuring a baby.
-
September 19, 2024
Conn. Justices Seem Open To Child Bond Claims In Injury Suit
Two Connecticut Supreme Court justices on Thursday seemed open to allowing parents to seek a new legal remedy for the impairment of their relationship with a child, with one justice observing that compensable losses aren't limited to "obligatory functions" under the state's existing tort law.
-
August 01, 2024
Conn. Defense Attys Can Weigh In On Baby Injury Case
The Connecticut Supreme Court will allow a group of defense attorneys to file a brief in car seat litigation in federal court that could affect whether companies can be held liable under state law for the absence of a child's relationship with their parents.
-
July 18, 2024
Conn. Lawyer Group Wants In On Baby Injury Case
A group of Connecticut defense lawyers Wednesday told the state supreme court that they should be allowed to address issues in a suit involving a car seat that allegedly injured a child since its decision will affect whether state law holds that companies can be held liable for the absence of a child's relationship with their parents.