Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
September 21, 2023
Federal Trade Commission v. U.S. Anesthesia Partners, Inc. et al
Case Number:
4:23-cv-03560
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Beck Redden
- Cooksey Marcin
- Cravath Swaine
- DLA Piper
- Gibson Dunn
- Gruenstein Law
- Hogan Lovells
- Katten Muchin
- Kellogg Hansen
- King & Spalding
- K&L Gates
- Mayer LLP
- Norton Rose
- Reese Marketos
- Ropes & Gray
- Rule Garza
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
- Yetter Coleman
Companies
- American Investment Council
- Envision Healthcare Corp.
- Envision Physician Services
- HCA Healthcare Inc.
- Texas Health Resources Inc.
- The Cigna Group
- U.S. Anesthesia Partners
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 31, 2026
Anesthesia Parent Can't Duck Antitrust Suit, But Affiliate Can
The parent company of U.S. Anesthesia Partners Inc. remains in the crosshairs of a private antitrust suit accusing it of trying to monopolize Texas anesthesia services, while a federal judge dismissed for now claims against an affiliate that he said was too far removed from the alleged rollup strategy.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login