Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC
Case Number:
3:24-cv-05417
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Cooley LLP
- Cowan DeBaets
- Edelson PC
- Fairmark Partners LLP
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kwun Bhansali
- Latham & Watkins
- Lieff Cabraser
- Mintz & Gold
- Morrison & Foerster
- Oppenheim & Zebrak
- Susman Godfrey
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 22, 2025
Judge Gets More Details On Proposed $1.5B Anthropic IP Deal
Authors who have inked a proposed $1.5 billion deal to end their copyright class action against artificial intelligence developer Anthropic PBC are saying they have worked out all the issues a California federal judge pointed out when he initially declined to give the deal approval.
-
September 08, 2025
'Disappointed' Alsup Wants More Info On $1.5B Anthropic Deal
U.S. District Judge William Alsup has declined to sign off on Anthropic's proposed $1.5 billion settlement with authors accusing the artificial intelligence developer of copyright infringement, saying he's "disappointed that counsel have left important questions" unanswered and instructing the parties to provide more information by the end of the month.
-
September 05, 2025
Anthropic Agrees To Pay $1.5B To Settle AI Copyright Fight
Leading artificial intelligence developer Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a case brought by a group of authors who accused the company of illegally using their works to train its flagship large language model, the authors told a California federal court on Friday.
-
August 26, 2025
Anthropic, Authors Reach Deal In AI Copyright Cases
Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic said Tuesday it has inked a deal to end copyright litigation from authors who allege that their works were illegally obtained to train the company's large language model, Claude.
-
August 14, 2025
Anthropic Asks 9th Circ. To Halt AI Copyright Trial For Appeal
Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic has urged the Ninth Circuit to overturn a California federal judge's refusal to delay trial in a copyright lawsuit from authors who allege their works were illegally obtained to train the company's large language model, Claude.
-
August 11, 2025
AI Firm Anthropic Can't Get Pause For Early Fair Use Appeal
A California federal judge on Monday denied a request from artificial intelligence firm Anthropic to pause a case over its use of books to train its large language model so it could appeal a ruling saying a jury would decide whether damages were warranted for the company's use of pirated works.
-
July 29, 2025
Authors Fight Anthropic's Appeal Of Fair Use Ruling
Authors battling artificial intelligence firm Anthropic over its use of their books to train a large language model have urged a California federal judge to disallow a mid-case appeal of his ruling that Anthropic could use books it bought legally, but not the millions it purportedly lifted from online libraries of pirated works.
-
July 28, 2025
Authors Want Court To Reject Anthropic's Bid To Delay Trial
A group of authors urged a California federal court Monday to reject Anthropic PBC's request to pause their copyright case while Anthropic appeals the court's recent class certification order, arguing that the company has "no basis for a stay" and is trying to deprive them of their day in court.
-
July 25, 2025
Anthropic Asks To Stay Copyright Suit To Appeal Class Cert.
Anthropic PBC has said it will seek a quick appeal to the Ninth Circuit of a California federal judge's decision last week to certify a class of owners of copyrights for books included in pirate websites that were downloaded by the AI developer to train its Claude generative text model.
-
July 23, 2025
Anthropic Judge Says Authors Can Seek OpenAI Docs In NY
A California federal judge on Wednesday told a certified class of authors claiming Anthropic stole their work to train its AI technology that they have his blessing to ask a New York court overseeing copyright litigation against OpenAI and Microsoft to produce documents and deposition testimony related to the California case.