Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Holsey Ellingburg, Jr., Petitioner v. United States
Case Number:
24-482
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Covington & Burling
- Gibson Dunn
- Quinn Emanuel
- Steptoe LLP
- Wiley Rein
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 14, 2025
Justices Lean Toward Ruling Mandatory Restitution Is Punitive
A majority of the U.S. Supreme Court justices appeared to embrace arguments Tuesday that forcing convicted defendants to pay restitution with compounding interest years after conviction is a criminal punishment and therefore subject to the Constitution's ban on increasing punishment retroactively.
-
October 10, 2025
Up Next At High Court: Voting Rights & Warrantless Entries
The U.S. Supreme Court will return Tuesday to hear oral arguments in four cases, including a dispute over the constitutionality of the last remaining provision of the Voting Rights Act and whether federal prisoners seeking postconviction relief are subject to the same rules as state inmates.
-
July 01, 2025
Compounding Restitution Is Unconstitutional, High Court Told
Nonprofits, think tanks and legal scholars filed briefs this week urging the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that a federal law requiring criminals to continue paying restitution with compounding interest for decades after conviction is unconstitutional because it can exponentially increase punishment for a crime.
-
April 07, 2025
Justices Enter Fray Over Criminal Restitution As Punishment
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to wade into what counsel for a convicted Georgia bank robber called a "deeply entrenched" circuit split over the constitutionality of a federal law that requires criminals to continue paying restitution with compounding interest for decades after conviction.