Response | Filed: June 02, 2026
| Entered: June 02, 2026
Kinnie Ma Individual Retirement Account v. Ascendant Capital, LLC et al
Stockholders Suits | Texas Western
Memorandum in Support
Memorandum in Support OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION PLAN by Kazue M. Bell, Dean Crooks, Loretta DeHay, Jeffery S. Gramm Individual Retirement Account, Kinnie Ma Individual Retirement Account, Catherine Kominos, Karen Loch, Corri Rene Eden, Robert A. Stone Living Trust, dated January 9, 1992, as amended May 24, 2005, Shirley Stone Living Trust, dated January 9, 1992, as amended May 24, 2005, Stacy Greasor Individual Retirement Account, The Stanley S. and Millicent R. Barasch Living Trust, Victor Wade Individual Retirement Account. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Approving Distribution Plan, # 2 Declaration of Alexander Villanova in Support, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B-1, # 5 Exhibit B-2, # 6 Exhibit B-3)(Centner, Daniel)
Order | Filed: May 26, 2026
| Entered: May 26, 2026
Edwards v. Community Services Inc et al
Civil Rights: Employment | Texas Northern
Order
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF OPTION TO CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RESOLVING PENDING DISPOSITIVE MOTION:
The presiding United States District Judge has referred to the undersigned United States magistrate judge Defendant CohnReznick LLPs Motion to Compel Arbitration, Rule 12(b)(3) Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 19] -- on which, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the undersigned must enter findings, conclusions, and recommendations for the presiding district judge's review and consideration after a period for filing any objections (and responses to those objections).
But the parties may consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to have this dispositive motion determined and decided by the undersigned magistrate judge and to waive their right to proceed before a United States District Judge on this motion. If all parties consent, the undersigned can decide the motion through an order that renders a final and binding ruling, subject to the applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of CiviI Procedure and the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, with any appeal (if one is authorized or permitted) directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Consenting to the undersigned resolving this motion would not affect the district judge's continuing to serve as the presiding judge for all other matters in this case.
Consent to the magistrate judge's authority to resolve a dispositive motion is voluntary. Any party is free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. But the undersigned's resolving this motion on consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) may permit a more efficient and inexpensive disposition of this motion under the circumstances.
If all parties consent to the undersigned magistrate judge's resolving this dispositive motion, the presiding United States District Judge can reassign the motion to the magistrate judge for resolution under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). If all parties do not consent, the undersigned will continue to handle the motion under the presiding United States District Judge's existing order of reference and will enter orders or findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and the parties will retain the right to seek review of the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations in the manner provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
A Notice and Election Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge is available at https://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/attorneys/civil-forms. If a party is willing to consent to the undersigned magistrate judge's resolving this dispositive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), please complete this form (specifying that the consent is limited to this specific motion) and return it to the district clerk -- but do not file it by CM/ECF on the docket -- by Tuesday, June 2, 2026.
(Ordered by Judge David Horan on 5/26/2026.) (rekc)