Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC
-
Notice | Filed: May 03, 2024 | Entered: May 03, 2024 Kraiem v. JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC et al
Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern
Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Jennifer H. Rearden is no longer assigned to the case. (vba)
-
Order | Filed: May 02, 2024 | Entered: May 02, 2024 Kraiem v. JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC et al
Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern
Scheduling Order
ORDER: A settlement conference is scheduled before Magistrate Judge Stewart Aaron on Tuesday, July 9, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. The conference shall proceed by Microsoft Teams unless the parties advise the Court that they have access to and prefer proceeding by alternative remote means. The Court will provide the Microsoft Teams information to the parties by email prior to the conference. The parties must comply with the Settlement Conference Procedures for Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-stewart-d-aaron. Please note that Section 4 of the Procedures requires counsel for each party to send a pre-settlement conference letter no later than 7 days before the conference (i.e., Tuesday, July 2, 2024). Settlement Conference set for 7/9/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 5/2/2024) (rro)
-
Order | Filed: April 12, 2024 | Entered: April 12, 2024 Kraiem v. JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC et al
Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern
Memo Endorsement
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 196 Status Report filed by Nefissa Kraiem ENDORSEMENT: The Court is in receipt of the joint status letter filed by the parties at ECF No. 196 referencing expert depositions to be held in April and May 2024. All expert discovery under the Court's auspices closed as of the extended March 8, 2024 deadline (see 1/26/24 Mem. End., ECF No. 195), without either party seeking a further extension of the discovery deadline before expiration of such deadline. Nevertheless, the parties may continue to engage in discovery on their own without further Court intervention. See Syracuse Univ. v. Otis Elevator Co., No. 09-CV-00172 (FJS) (DEP), 2010 WL 2680230, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. July 1, 2010) (expiration of discovery deadline "does not preclude the parties, by agreement, from continuing pretrial discovery, including conducting depositions, after the discovery deadline[,]" but "the court will not intervene to resolve any discovery disputes arising out of discovery occurring after expiration of the deadline"); Waring v. Geodis Logistics LLC, No. 19-CV-04415-GW (KSX), 2020 WL 8509665, at *7 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2020) ("[W]hile the parties certainly may agree, without court approval, to conduct discovery after the court-imposed deadlines, if they do so and disputes arise, this Court lacks jurisdiction to resolve such disputes."). With respect to the proposed briefing schedule for Defendants' anticipated motion for summary judgment, the undersigned respectfully defers to District Judge Rearden. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 4/12/2024) (ks)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login