Law360 - The Newswire for Business Lawyers

Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Law360 Law360
  Sign In

Law360

|

The Practice of Law

Access to Justice Aerospace & Defense Appellate Asset Management Banking Bankruptcy Benefits California Cannabis Capital Markets Class Action Colorado Commercial Contracts Competition Compliance Connecticut Construction Consumer Protection Corporate Criminal Practice Cybersecurity & Privacy Delaware Employment
Energy Environmental Fintech Florida Food & Beverage Georgia Government Contracts Health Hospitality Illinois Immigration Insurance Intellectual Property International Arbitration International Trade Legal Ethics Legal Industry Life Sciences Massachusetts Media & Entertainment Mergers & Acquisitions Michigan Native American
New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania Personal Injury & Medical Malpractice Private Equity Product Liability Project Finance Public Policy Real Estate Retail & E-Commerce Securities Sports & Betting Tax Technology Telecommunications Texas Transportation Trials Washington White Collar

Law360 Pulse

|

Business of Law

California Pulse Connecticut Pulse Courts DC Pulse Daily Litigation Delaware Pulse
Florida Pulse Georgia Pulse In-House Insights Legal Tech & AI Mid-Law
Modern Lawyer New Jersey Pulse New York Pulse Pennsylvania Pulse Small Law Texas Pulse

Law360 Authority

|

Deep News & Analysis

Tax Authority

Federal International State & Local

Employment Authority

Discrimination Labor Other Wage & Hour

Insurance Authority

General Liability Other Property Specialty Lines

Real Estate Authority

Commercial Other Residential

Bankruptcy Authority

Large Cap Mid Cap

Healthcare Authority

Deals & Corporate Governance Digital Health & Technology Other Policy & Compliance

Law360 Global Products

Law360 UK

Commercial Litigation UK Corporate Crime & Compliance UK Employment UK
Financial Services UK Insurance UK Intellectual Property UK
Pulse UK Transactions UK

Law360 Australia

Commercial Disputes AU Financial Services AU

Close
    • Law360 US
    • Law360
    • Law360 Pulse
    • Law360 Employment Authority
    • Law360 Tax Authority
    • Law360 Insurance Authority
    • Law360 Real Estate Authority
    • Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
    • Law360 Healthcare Authority
    • Sections
    • Adv. Search & Platform Tools
    • Commercial Litigation UK
    • Corporate Crime & Compliance UK
    • Employment UK
    • Financial Services UK
    • Insurance UK
    • Intellectual Property UK
    • Pulse UK
    • Transactions UK
    • Site Menu
    • Join the Law360 team
    • Search legal jobs
    • Learn more about Law360
    • Read testimonials
    • Contact Law360
    • Sign up for our newsletters
    • Law360 Company
    • About Law360 Authority
    • Resource Library
Commercial Litigation Corporate Crime & Compliance Employment Financial Services Insurance Pulse Law360 US || See all sections

Searching dockets in The Animal Medical Center

 

Please assign a name to this alert

All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes

Case Activity (1738)

  1. Order | Filed: September 15, 2026 Piney et al v. City Of New York et al

    Labor: Fair Standards | New York Southern

    Order

    ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OFCLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENTOn August 12, 2026, Plaintiffs M. Mostayen Faysal ("Faysal") and Sudan Osorio("Osorio"), on behalf of themselves and the proposed Class (collectively, &qu ot;Plaintiffs"), filed amotion for preliminary approval of their Settlement with Defendant School of Visual Arts (namedin the Action as "SVA Alumni Society Inc.," and hereafter referred to as "SVA" or "Defendant")(t ogether with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"). In doing so, Plaintiffs requested certification of a FederalRule of Civil Procedure 23 ("Rule 23") class action and final certification of the FLSA collectiveaction, for settlement purposes only, and sought approval of a settlement on behalf of these putativeclass members ("Class Members"). The Court has considered Plaintiffs' request for approval of aRule 23 class pursuant to Rule 23(e) and collective certification for settlement purposes only, andthe SVA Settlement Agreement and Release ("SVA Agreement"), filed in its final form on August12, 2026, and the Declaration of Innessa M. Huot ("Huot Decl."), and hereby finds and orders asfollows:Preli minary Approval of Settlement Unless otherwise defined herein, all terms used in this Order (the "Preliminary Approval Order") will have the same meaning as defined in the SVA Agreement, filed on August 12, 2026. As further set forth in thi s Order, The Court will conduct a Fairness Hearing pursuant to Rule 23(e)(2) on March 2, 2027 at 10:00 a.m. ET, Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 for the purposes of: (a) hearing any timely and properly filed objections; (b) makin g a final determination as to the fairness, adequacy, and reasonableness of the SVA Agreement terms and procedures; (c) fixing the amount of attorneys' fees and litigation costs andexpenses to Class Counsel and the service payments to Plaintiffs Faysal and Osorio; and (d)entering Judgment, if appropriate. The Fairness Hearing may be continued without further noticeto the Class Members. Plaintiffs shall file their motion for final approval of the SVA Settlement,and Class Counsel shall file their motion for attorneys' fees and litigation costs and expenses, andservice payments within 150 days of this Order. (And as further set forth herein.) IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave on 9/15/2026) (ar)

  2. Order | Filed: September 15, 2026 Piney et al v. City Of New York et al

    Labor: Fair Standards | New York Southern

    Order

    ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT On August 12, 2026, Plaintiffs Wadih Abouabdallah ("Abouabdallah"), Randy Chow ("Chow"), Anna Garlinska ("Garlinska"), Tamara Lauzier ("L auzier"), and Justin Senese ("Senese"), on behalf of themselves and the proposed Class (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed a motion for preliminary approval of Plaintiffs' Settlement with Defendant Manhattan High School for Girls ("Manhattan HS or "Defendant") (together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"). In doing so, Plaintiffs requested certification of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 ("Rule 23") class action and final certific ation of the FLSA collective action, for settlement purposes only, and sought approval of a settlement on behalf of these putative class members ("Class Members"). The Court has considered Plaintiffs' request for approval of a Rule 23 class pursuant to Rule 23(e) and collective certification for settlement purposes only, and the Manhattan HS Settlement Agreement and Release ("Manhattan HS Agreement"), filed in its final form on August 12, 2026, and the Declaration of Inn essa M. Huot ("Huot Decl."), and hereby finds and orders as follows: I. Preliminary Approval of Settlement 1. Unless otherwise defined herein, all terms used in this Order (the "Preliminary Approval Order") will have the same mean ing as defined in the Manhattan HS Agreement, filed on August 12, 2026. As further set forth in this Order, The Court will conduct a Fairness Hearing pursuant to Rule 23(e) (2) on March 2, 2027 at 10:00 a.m. ET, Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New Y ork, NY 10007 for the purposes of: (a) hearing any timely and properly filed objections; (b) making a final determination as to the fairness, adequacy, and reasonableness of the Manhattan HS Agreement terms and procedures; (c) fixing the amount of a ttorneys' fees and litigation costs and expenses to Class Counsel and the service payments to Plaintiffs Abouabdallah, Chow, Garlinska, Lauzier, and Senese; and (d) entering Judgment, if appropriate. The Fairness Hearing may be continued withou t further notice to the Class Members. Plaintiffs shall file their motion for final approval of the Manhattan HS Settlement, and Class Counsel shall file their motion for attorneys' fees and litigation costs and expenses, and service payments within 150 days of this Order. (And as further set forth herein.) IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave on 9/15/2026) (ar)

  3. 1736 additional result(s)

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Archive of over 450,000 articles
  • Database of over 2.1 million cases
  • Full-text search of patent complaints
  • Full-text search of PTAB cases and documents
  • Database of TTAB cases and documents, including full-text search of documents
  • Customized email alerts and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View full search results

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access? Click here to login

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Register Now!

Sign up now for free access to this content

PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.

Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.

You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.

We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Register

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In
RELX Group Lexis Nexis

© 2026, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About | Contact Us | Editorial Contacts | Terms | Privacy Policy | Trust Center | Cookie Settings | Processing Notice | Ad Choices | Resource Library | Law360 Company