Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Alhalel Law x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Contract: Other | Florida Middle
Extension of Time to File Answer / Respond to Complaint
Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 32 Third Party Complaint by Citibank, N.A.. (Sbar, Jonathan) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway.
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice 42 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for failure to include a proper memorandum of law in violation of Local Rule 3.01(b). The Motion fails to cite to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55, which applies when an extension is requested after the time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint has expired and requires the movant to establish "good cause." See Perez v. Wells Fargo N.A., 774 F.3d 1329, 1337 (11th Cir. 2014). Defendant's response was due June 12, 2026. Thus, Defendant must explain why such a lengthy extension is needed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 7/10/2026. (CFG)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.