Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Bulkley Richardson x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act | Massachusetts
Extension of Time
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to August 10, 2026 to Object and/or Respond to Defendant's First Set of Discovery Requests by Kathy Early.(Howard, Claire)
P.I.: Other | Massachusetts
Order on Motion for Reconsideration Order on Motion for Hearing Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Morgan: ELECTRONIC ORDER denying 172 motion for reconsideration, denying 182 motion for hearing, and denying 183 emergency motion. The defendant Louis Buoniconti has filed a motion to reconsider, in which he asserts financial hardship in connection with the garnishment of his monthly retirement benefits by the Office of Personnel Management to satisfy the judgment entered against him on the plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 172). The parties have consented to this court's jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 181). Because the defendant fails to identify any order of this court for which reconsideration is warranted, whether relating to the garnishment of his retirement benefits or otherwise, his motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 172), for a hearing (Dkt. No. 182), and for emergency relief (Dkt. No. 183) are denied. In so ruling, the court notes that the plaintiff previously sought an order of this court directing the Office of Personnel Management to pay her 75% of the gross monthly annuity otherwise due and payable to the defendant for the enforcement of the judgment rendered against him for physically, sexually, or emotionally abusing a child (Dkt. No. 163). This court denied the plaintiff her requested relief based on the definition of the court from which such an order could issue omitting federal district courts (Dkt. No. 168). According to an affidavit filed by the plaintiff's counsel, it was thereafter that the plaintiff domesticated the judgment in the Chicopee District Court and obtained an order from that court finding that the judgment in question was entered against the defendant for a claim involving sexual abuse of a child (Dkt. Nos. 175-76). It is on the basis of the March 18, 2025, order of the Chicopee District Court that the Office of Personnel Management began, on or around March 30, 2026, to pay a portion of the defendants retirement benefits to the plaintiff. The defendant's motions fail to identify any mechanism by which this court could reconsider the state court's order or otherwise enjoin OPM from paying defendant's retirement benefits to plaintiff pursuant to that order. (MPZ)
In so ruling, the court notes that the plaintiff previously sought an order of this court directing the Office of Personnel Management to pay her 75% of the gross monthly annuity otherwise due and payable to the defendant for the enforcement of the judgment rendered against him for physically, sexually, or emotionally abusing a child (Dkt. No. 163). This court denied the plaintiff her requested relief based on the definition of the court from which such an order could issue omitting federal district courts (Dkt. No. 168). According to an affidavit filed by the plaintiff's counsel, it was thereafter that the plaintiff domesticated the judgment in the Chicopee District Court and obtained an order from that court finding that the judgment in question was entered against the defendant for a claim involving sexual abuse of a child (Dkt. Nos. 175-76). It is on the basis of the March 18, 2025, order of the Chicopee District Court that the Office of Personnel Management began, on or around March 30, 2026, to pay a portion of the defendants retirement benefits to the plaintiff. The defendant's motions fail to identify any mechanism by which this court could reconsider the state court's order or otherwise enjoin OPM from paying defendant's retirement benefits to plaintiff pursuant to that order.
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.