Case Activity (626)

1. Order | Filed: October 06, 2026 | Entered: October 06, 2026 Moore et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

   Anti-Trust | Colorado

   Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

   ORDER finding as moot 25 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 15 Motion to Certify Class by Defendant National Collegiate Athletic Association. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 10/6/2026. Text Only Entry(cnsja, )

2. Order | Filed: October 06, 2026 | Entered: October 06, 2026 Moore et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

   Anti-Trust | Colorado

   Order on Motion for Hearing/Conference

   ORDER: Before the Court is the Emergency Motion by Plaintiffs for an Expedited Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification and Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, or Alternatively for Expedited Ruling on Same. ECF No. 40. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion. This case is substantially similar to Wisne et al. v. NCAA, both in terms of its background facts and legal issues presented. On August 21, 2026, the Tenth Circuit stayed the Court's preliminary injunction in Wisne. See Wisne, Case No. 261309 (10th Cir.), Dkt No. 28. Oral argument on the merits in that case is scheduled for October 13, 2026. Wisne, Case No. 261309, Dkt. No. 45. Given the substantial overlap between this case and Wisne, which is pending before the Tenth Circuit, denial of Plaintiffs' request for an expedited hearing or ruling on the pending motions is proper. See, e.g., Second Amend. Found., Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, No. 3:21cv0116B, 2023 WL 4497266, at *1 (N.D. Tex. July 10, 2023) (observing in stay context that district courts may stay case "when a related case with substantially similar issues is pending before a court of appeals" (citation modified)); Greco v. Nat'l Football League, 116 F. Supp. 3d 744, 761 (N.D. Tex. 2015) (finding it was in "the interests of the parties, and appropriate conservation of judicial resources" to stay case where issues in similar case on appeal "w[ould] very likely bear on [the instant case]"). And although Second Amendment and Greco arose in the stay context, the Court finds their reasoning persuasive as to whether granting Plaintiff's requested relief is proper. Simply stated, the "final outcome" of Wisne "will likely streamline issues" for the parties' pending motions, and the "risk of duplicative litigation is too great for this Court to ignore." Greco, 116 F. Supp. 3d at 761. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion. ECF No. 40 . By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 10/6/2026. Text Only Entry(cnsja, )

3. 624 additional result(s)