Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Clouse Brown x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud | Texas Northern
Notice of Appeal
NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 651 Order on Motion for Leave to File, 660 Order on Motion for Leave to File,,, 658 Judgment, 402 Memorandum Opinion and Order, 650 Order on Motion for Leave to File,, 657 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law to the Fifth Circuit by VeroBlue Farms USA Inc. Filing fee $605, receipt number ATXNDC-16846855. T.O. form to appellant electronically at Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (Anwar, Kamran)
Order on Motion for Leave to File
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying 659 Motion for Leave to File. Before the Court is VeroBlue's motion for leave to file (Doc. 659 ). The Court DENIES the motion. The transcript will be available to the Fifth Circuit for review but will remain sealed. VeroBlue claims the requirements for sealing are not met. This statement is as conclusory as it is wrong. VeroBlue convinced one district attorney to charge one of the founders previously. This is what VeroBlue does. An in camera session discussing the extent of the Fifth Amendment privilege is the last thing the Court would turn over to VeroBlue. The Fifth Circuit has access to all sealed material. And it is more than capable of determining if this Court drew the correct line. The Court denies the motion for leave to file because it would deny the motion to unseal the transcript. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/2/2026) (chmb)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.