Case Activity (132)

1. Order | Filed: July 29, 2026 | Entered: July 29, 2026 Weaver v. Segal, McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney

   Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern

   Order of Dismissal

   ORDER: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court's calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after thirty (30) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences and deadlines are CANCELED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 7/29/2026) (ks)

2. Order | Filed: July 23, 2026 | Entered: July 23, 2026 DYCE v. JP MORGAN CHASE

   Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment | New Jersey

   Text Order

   TEXT ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' respective letters of 7/6/26 and 7/15/26 detailing unresolved discovery disputes regarding, among other things, documents and further deposition testimony sought by Plaintiff from a non-party witness Marquis Evans (ECF Nos. 38 & 40), as well as Plaintiff's motion filed on 7/16/26 requesting that the Court "so-order the enclosed third-party subpoena compelling Marquis Evans to appear for the continuation of his deposition," and extend the deadline to raise discovery disputes ("July 16th submission") (ECF No. 41), and Defendant's response thereto (ECF No. 42). The discovery disputes detailed in the parties' respective letters of July 6th and July 15th will be addressed in due course. The relief sought in Plaintiff's July 16th submission is denied for two independent reasons. First, from a case management perspective, the Court finds it inefficient to address proceeding with the continuation of Mr. Evan's deposition while discovery disputes regarding the documents and deposition testimony sought remain outstanding and require resolution by the Court. Second, Plaintiff's motion is procedurally improper as the Court does not "so order' subpoenas. To the extent Plaintiff seeks a deponent's compliance with a properly served subpoena, Plaintiff is advised to seek the appropriate relief in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In light of the foregoing, Mr. Evans' continued deposition shall not proceed on July 28th. Rather, the issue about continuing his deposition shall be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the above-referenced discovery disputes. Finally, Plaintiff's request to extend the deadline to raise discovery disputes will be addressed at the August 12th Conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen on 7/23/2026. (amv)

3. 130 additional result(s)