Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in David A Nachtigall Attorney At Law x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Other | Texas Southern
Order
ORDER re: In sum, each factor under Rule 16(b)(4) supports good cause for amendment of the scheduling order and complaint.The motion for leave to amend is thus GRANTED. Dkt 175.The second amended complaint will be docketed separately as the live and operative complaint in this action. Dkt 175-1.The pending motions by Defendants to dismiss are DENIED AS MOOT. Dkts 153-61 & 165-68.Defendants must renew any such motions as to the second amended complaint by September 18, 2026. Plaintiff must file a response by October 23, 2026. Defendants must file any reply by November 6, 2026. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc.
Second AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Larhonda Biggles. (jmg4)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.