Case Activity (3003)

1. Misc | Filed: August 05, 2026 | Entered: August 05, 2026 Mac Donald v. County of Suffolk et al

   Civil Rights: Other | New York Eastern

   Letter

   Letter Joint letter regarding settlement in principle and respectfully requesting the Court adjourn the trial and future pre-trial deadlines sine die by Martine Mac Donald (Powell, Cobia)

2. Order | Filed: August 04, 2026 Corbin v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority et al

   Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern

   Order

   OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re: 95 LETTER MOTION to Seal addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Morgan L. Mickelsen dated 9/22/2025. filed by Kendra Corbin, 76 MOTION for S ummary Judgment Notice of Motion. filed by Robert Ramos, 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment Rule 56 Statement. filed by Robert Ramos, 81 LETTER MOTION to Seal addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Helene R. Hechtkopf dated September 19, 2025. filed by The Metropolitan Transit Authority, The New York City Transit Authority, Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, 77 MOTION for Summary Judgment Declaration of Brian C. Mitchell. filed by Robert Ramos, 86 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Th e Metropolitan Transit Authority, The New York City Transit Authority, Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority. For the foregoing reasons, the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority ("TBTA"), Met ropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA"), and New York City Transit Authority ("NYCTA") is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant Robert Ramos's motion for summary judgment is likewise GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN P ART. The disposition of the claims is as follows: Count One - Title VII Discrimination. MT A and NYCT A are entitled to summary judgment dismissing Count One as against them. TBTA's motion for summary judgment dismissing Count One is DENIED. Cou nt One was not asserted against Ramos. Corbin's Title VII sex-based hostile-work-environment claim against TBTA will proceed to trial. Count Two - ADA Discrimination. MTA, NYCTA, and TBTA are entitled to summary judgment dismissing all theories asserted in Count Two, including disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, and discriminatory termination. Count Two was not asserted against Ramos and is DISMISSED in its entirety. Count Three - ADA Retaliation. MTA, NYCTA, and TBTA are ent itled to summary judgment dismissing Count Three. Count Three was not asserted against Ramos and is DISMISSED in its entirety. Count Four-NYCHRL Discrimination. 1. MTA and NYCT A are entitled to summary judgment dismissing Count Four in its entirety as against them. 2. TBTA is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the disability-discrimination component of Count Four. Its motion for summary judgment dismissing the sex-based hostile-work-environment component is DENIED. The NYCHRL sex-based hos tile-work-environment claim against TBTA will proceed to trial. 3. Ramos is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the disability-discrimination component of Count Four. His motion for summary judgment dismissing the direct sex-based hostile-work-en vironment component is DENIED. The direct NYCHRL sex-based hostile-work environment claim against Ramos will proceed to trial. Count Five - NYCHRL Retaliation. MTA, NYCTA, and TBTA are entitled to summary judgment dismissing Count Five. Count Five wa s not asserted against Ramos and is DISMISSED in its entirety. Count Six - NYSHRL Discrimination. 1. MTA and NYCTA are entitled to summary judgment dismissing Count Sixin its entirety as against them.2. TBTA is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the disability-discrimination component of Count Six. However, its motion for summary judgment dismissing the sex-based hostile-work-environment component is DENIED. Corbin's NYSHRL sex-based hostile-work-environment claim against TBTA will pro ceed to trial. 3. Ramos is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the direct sex-and disability-discrimination claims asserted against him in Count Six. Count Six does not otherwise survive against Ramos. Count Seven - NYSHRL Retaliation. MT A, NYCT A, and TBT A are entitled to summary judgment dismissing Count Seven. Count Seven was not asserted against Ramos and is DISMISSED in its entirety. Count Eight - Aiding and Abetting Under the NYSHRL. Ramos is entitled to summary judgment dismissing C ount Eight. Count Eight was asserted only against Ramos and is DISMISSED in its entirety. Count Nine - Aiding and Abetting... (truncated)

3. 3001 additional result(s)