Case Activity (4211)

1. Order | Filed: June 23, 2026 | Entered: June 23, 2026 Ciampa et al v. Suffolk County Community College et al

   Civil Rights: Other | New York Eastern

   1 - Terminate Hearings Scheduling Order

   SCHEDULING ORDER. In light of Judge Dunst's order extending discovery deadlines (Elec. Order, June 22, 2026), the Court amends its April 21, 2026 scheduling order as follows:
   
   The parties are notified that any party seeking to exclude the testimony of an expert pursuant to Rules 702-705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), line of cases shall file a letter requesting a pre-motion conference on the anticipated motion by September 7, 2026. See Individual Rule 5.1.
   
   The parties are required to participate, in good faith, in a settlement conference before the assigned magistrate judge prior to initiating any motion to limit expert testimony or motion for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or, if no such motions are pursued, filing any proposed Joint Pre-Trial Order. See Individual Rule 5.1.1 & 7.1. The parties are required to attend the settlement conference in-person or via video and must plan ahead in order to ensure that this settlement conference occurs before any deadline set by Magistrate Judge Dunst or the undersigned for filing a summary judgment motion or the Joint Pre-Trial Order. Failure to request and attend such a conference precludes a party from filing a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56.
   
   Counsel for the parties shall appear for an in-person status conference before Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on October 8, 2026 at 2:00 PM in the Alfonse D'Amato Courthouse in Central Islip, Courtroom 1040. Counsel for the parties shall be prepared to discuss trial dates and the arguments set forth in any letters requesting a pre-motion conference on anticipated Daubert and dispositive motions.
   
   The parties must work with Magistrate Judge Dunst to ensure the proper and timely filing of the joint pre-trial order and any motions in limine in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules. See Individual Rule 7.
   
   The parties are notified that the Court will not issue a briefing schedule on a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or hold a conference concerning the joint pre-trial order unless the parties have participated, in good faith, in a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Dunst.
   
   Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 6/23/2026. (CQTH)

2. Response | Filed: June 23, 2026 | Entered: June 23, 2026 Doe v. McDonald, M.D. et al

   Civil Rights: Other | New York Southern

   Memorandum of Law in Support (non-motion)

   MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 20 Proposed Order to Show Cause With Emergency Relief, . Document filed by Jane Doe..(Finn, Patricia)

3. 4209 additional result(s)