Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Hadef & Partners
-
Filed: May 13, 2024 | Entered: May 13, 2024 Dou, et al. v. Carillon Tower/Chicago LP et al.
190(Contract: Other) | Illinois Northern
Certificate
CERTIFICATE Certificate of Service Rule 34 Citation Production Requests (Dunn, Glen) (Entered: 05/13/2024)
-
Filed: April 23, 2024 | Entered: April 23, 2024 Dou, et al. v. Carillon Tower/Chicago LP et al.
190(Contract: Other) | Illinois Northern
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Douglas Litowitz under LR 37.1 in Support of Motion for Rule to Show Cause (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Nevada Bench Warrants and Contempt, # 2 Exhibit Cook Cnty Sherriff Foreclosure Sale, # 3 Exhibit Ding Dep Transcript)(Litowitz, Douglas) (Entered: 04/23/2024)
-
Filed: March 05, 2024 | Entered: March 05, 2024 Dou, et al. v. Carillon Tower/Chicago LP et al.
190(Contract: Other) | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Defendants indicate in their response 629 that they do not oppose Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 22-cv-7081 (pending before Judge Kendall) 624 . Therefore, the motion 624 is granted. The Court finds that the two lawsuits in question are related under Local Rule 40.4(a). The two cases grow out of the same issues of fact and law, namely the alleged misappropriation of funds from Chinese investors by Defendants Jason Ding and Jeffrey Laytin. Furthermore, the four conditions for reassignment set forth in Local Rule 40.4(b) are all satisfied, as both cases are proceeding in this District, and they seek review of the same legal question. As a result, the handling of both cases by the same district judge (Judge Hunt) and magistrate judge (Judge Kim) is likely to result in a substantial saving of judicial time and effort. This case, the earlier filed case, has not progressed to the point where consolidation would delay proceedings, as the parties engaged in discovery regarding Defendants' assets. Finally, the two cases are susceptible of disposition in a single proceeding before this Court. Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 40.4(d), the Court finds that Li, et al. v. Forefront EB-Fund (HCR) LLC, et al., No. 1:22-cv-07081, as the higher-numbered case, should be reassigned to this Court. No appearance is necessary on 3/7/24. As such, the notice of motion 630 (which does not include an attached motion) is stricken. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 03/05/2024)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login