Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
James Bates Brannan
-
Notice | Filed: June 06, 2024 | Entered: June 06, 2024 DOWNING et al v. THOMAS et al
Assault Libel & Slander | Georgia Middle
Notice (Other)
NOTICE to pro se plaintiffs of motions to dismiss (tlf).
-
Order | Filed: June 05, 2024 | Entered: June 05, 2024 DOWNING et al v. THOMAS et al
Assault Libel & Slander | Georgia Middle
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER denying 60 Plaintiff Downing's Motion requesting assistance with service of defendants. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, the Court DENIES Plaintiff Downing's motion for the Court to order assistance with the service of defendants. In this case, neither Plaintiff Downing or any of the other numerous pro se plaintiffs are indigent as they have paid the full filing fee. They must follow Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and properly serve each and every defendant with the require time limits. Otherwise, they run the very real risk of having their complaint dismissed against any defendant not timely served. Finally, the Court reminds all plaintiffs that they cannot represent any other plaintiff and they cannot sign pleadings on behalf of another. All plaintiffs must sign a pleading for it to be applicable to each of them. Otherwise, the Court will only construe a pleading as applicable to the particular plaintiff that signed it. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 6/5/2024 (TES)
-
Order | Filed: June 05, 2024 | Entered: June 05, 2024 DOWNING et al v. THOMAS et al
Assault Libel & Slander | Georgia Middle
Order on Motion for Default Judgment
This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER denying 59 Motion for Default Judgment against United States Post Office and Arrington. As an initial matter, only Plaintiff Downing filed the motion and because he can only represent himself, he may only move on his behalf, not on behalf of the other pro se plaintiffs. Regardless, Plaintiff Downing has failed to show that he has properly served the United States Post Office in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Neither has Plaintiff Downing shown that he has properly served Defendant Arrington in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4. The Court reminds all Plaintiffs that they must serve all defendants within the time limits of Rule 4 as well or they risk their complaint being dismissed. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 6/5/2024 (TES)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login