Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Lawrence A. Garvey & Associates
-
Order | Filed: January 16, 2024 | Entered: January 16, 2024 Rodriguez v. Action Nissan Inc
Other Statutory Actions | New York Southern
Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Dismissal
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: NOW COMES the Plaintiff, Elizabeth Rodriguez, and Defendant, Action Nissan, Inc., by and through their respective counsel, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), who hereby stipulate and agree to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff's individual claims against Defendant and without prejudice of the putative class claims against Defendant. Each party shall bear its own respective costs and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Victoria Reznik on 1/16/2024) (ks)
-
Misc | Filed: January 16, 2024 | Entered: January 16, 2024 Rodriguez v. Action Nissan Inc
Other Statutory Actions | New York Southern
Notice to Attorney Regarding Deficient Voluntary Dismissal
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Manuel Hiraldo. RE-FILE Document No. 67 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): (1) the wrong party/parties whom the voluntary dismissal is against was/were selected; (2) the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not signed by all parties who have appeared. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned ink signature image) PDF. (tp)
-
Misc | Filed: January 12, 2024 | Entered: January 12, 2024 Rodriguez v. Action Nissan Inc
Other Statutory Actions | New York Southern
Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Elizabeth Rodriguez pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Elizabeth Rodriguez. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Hiraldo, Manuel)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login