Case Activity (77)

1. Order | Filed: July 28, 2026 | Entered: July 28, 2026 Zihan Holding LLC et al v. Eli Garden Fusion, LLC et al

   Trademark | New York Southern

   Order for Initial Pretrial Conference

   ORDER RE SCHEDULING AND INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This action having been assigned to me for all purposes, it is hereby, ORDERED as follows: 1. Counsel receiving this order shall promptly mail copies hereof to all other counsel of record or, in the case of parties for which no appearance has been made, to such parties. 2. Counsel for all parties are directed to confer regarding an agreed scheduling order. If counsel are able to agree on a schedule and the agreed schedule calls for filing of the pretrial order not more than six (6) months from the date of this order, counsel shall sign and file by 9/08/2026 a consent order in the formannexed for consideration by the Court. If such a consent order is not filed within the time provided, a videoconferenceinvite will be emailed to counsel setting a video-conference on 9/15/2026 at 11:30 AM. 3. Any party desiring a conference with the Court for purposes of discussing settlement, narrowing of issues, or other pertinent pretrial matters may request a conference by letter. 4. Counsel should be aware that this case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing (ECF). It is the responsibility of counsel to become familiar with and follow ECF procedures. Information regarding the ECF system can be found on the Court's website at www.nysd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 7/28/2026) Initial Conference set for 9/15/2026 at 11:30 AM before Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. (ar)

2. Order | Filed: July 27, 2026 | Entered: July 28, 2026 Zihan Holding LLC et al v. Eli Garden Fusion, LLC et al

   Trademark | New York Southern

   Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction Order on Motion to Transfer Case

   MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER 14 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 14 Motion to Dismiss; denying 14 Motion to Transfer Case. For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss or, alternatively, transfer this action to the Central District of California (Dkt 14) is denied. In view of the facts that there has been no evidentiary hearing as to personal jurisdiction and that plaintiffs bear the ultimate burden of proving its existence, this decision is without prejudice to defendants reasserting the personal jurisdiction issue later in the litigation and, if need be, at any trial. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 7/27/2026) (ar)

3. 75 additional result(s)