Response | Filed: October 05, 2026
| Entered: October 05, 2026
Compass Marketing, Inc. v. Flywheel Digital LLC et al
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | Maryland
Reply to Response to Motion
REPLY to Response to Motion re 74 MOTION to Compel Former Counsel to Produce File to Custodian filed by Compass Marketing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - St. Mary's Cnty. Order Registering Custodian Order (10/1/2026), # 2 Exhibit B - Email Transmitting Morgan Lewis Settlement Presentation (5/16/2021), # 3 Exhibit C - Moorad Email to Forbes, as Forwarded (7/1/2021), # 4 Exhibit D - Email Chain re Funding and Counsel (1/15-16/2022), # 5 Exhibit E - Woodsford Term Sheet, Excerpt (3/17/2022), # 6 Exhibit F - United States v. Perez-Chach, No. 25-6951 (4th Cir. 7/31/2026), # 7 Exhibit G - Custodian Letter to Morgan Lewis with Email Chain (6/10/2026), # 8 Exhibit H - Arlington Order Denying Stay (7/1/2026), # 9 Exhibit I - Custodian Email and Letter to Morgan Lewis (7/14/2026), # 10 Exhibit J - Custodian Email to Morgan Lewis Transmitting Motion (7/30/2026), # 11 Exhibit K - Notice of Electronic Filing, ECF No. 74 (7/30/2026), # 12 Exhibit L - Notice of Electronic Filing, ECF No. 75 (9/1/2026), # 13 Exhibit M - Notice of Appeal, Arlington No. CL21004012-00 (7/8/2026), # 14 Exhibit N - Compass Annual Report, Va. SCC (3/7/2022), # 15 Exhibit O - Morgan Lewis Engagement Letter and Transmittal Emails (10/2020), # 16 Exhibit P - Email to Counsel re Boshea Subpoenas (7/16/2021), # 17 Exhibit Q - Moorad Email to Custodian (10/4/2021), # 18 Exhibit R - Email to Legalist with Chain (8/2024), # 19 Exhibit S - Stock Option Agreement with Transmittal Email (10/2015), # 20 Exhibit T - Stock Purchase Agreement, Deerwood Associates (10/13/2015), # 21 Exhibit U - Gibson Dunn Email Transmitting Revised Agreements (9/2016), #
Order | Filed: October 05, 2026
| Entered: October 05, 2026
Edelen et al v. Lanni et al
Other Statutory Actions | Maryland
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
PAPERLESS ORDER denying the plaintiffs' motion to declare Maryland laws unconstitutional 5 without prejudice; the plaintiffs may renew the motion after the defendants have answered the complaint, if the case is not remanded to state court or dismissed. The defendants' motion for extension of time to respond to the motion to declare Maryland laws unconstitutional 6 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 10/5/2026. (lmys, Chambers)