Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Marrinan & Mazzola
-
Order | Filed: May 14, 2024 | Entered: May 14, 2024 Local 3621, EMS Officers Union, DC-37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al v. City of New York et al
Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
ORDER granting 560 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. This request is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis on 5/14/2024) (tg)
-
Motion | Filed: May 13, 2024 | Entered: May 13, 2024 Local 3621, EMS Officers Union, DC-37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al v. City of New York et al
Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern
Extension of Time
FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to comply with the Court's April 26th and May 8th Orders addressed to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis from Laura C. Williams dated May 13, 2024. Document filed by City Of New York, Department of Citywide Administrative Services, New York City Fire Department..(Williams, Laura)
-
Order | Filed: May 08, 2024 Local 3621, EMS Officers Union, DC-37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al v. City of New York et al
Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern
Order
ORDER: First, the April order directed the Parties' data experts "to meet for short conferences to work on the specific issues identifiedto determine whether custom queries or other methods may lead to faster, less burdensome production of the data." Dkt. No. 553 at 16. While the experts are not limited to the Court's verbatim language in that Order, they are restricted to the specific issues identified in the Order. Those issues, as indicated in the last Order, are only : 1) leave data and 2) promotional data. Dkt. No. 553 at 11-12. Second, the intent of the Court's April Order was that the conferences would be short, informal conferences between experts, where the experts would discuss with each other whethe r the use of certain search methods (such as custom queries) could secure the specific data items mentioned in the Order in an unburdensome way. These are not intended to be depositions. The meetings should not be transcribed and none of the expe rts should be sworn. Ideally, the attorneys would have little to no involvement and the experts themselves would speak directly to each other. Third, the City is required to produce data within its possession. It is not limited to only producing do cuments representing pre-existing set queries. If the experts together find that custom queries could reasonably secure the requested data, they should use custom queries to do so. However, if such queries would be impossible or overly burdensome, the City can inform the Court and may not be required to run them. Fourth, by Friday, May 10th, the City shall submit at least three available dates to Plaintiff for these conferences. By May 17th, the Parties shall complete the expert conferences and provide the Court with a status update and proposed timeline for completing the ordered data productions. Finally, the Court reiterates that failure to abide by these directives could result in sanctions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis on 5/8/2024) (tg)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login