Case Activity (13)

1. Order | Filed: July 06, 2026 | Entered: July 06, 2026 USA v. 637 Sawmill Road, Loveland, Colorado

   Forfeit/Penalty: Other | Colorado

   Order on Motion for Leave to Restrict

   ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Leave to Restrict by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on July 6, 2026. This is one of several motions to restrict that Plaintiff has filed in this case (ECF Nos. 3 , 13 , 15 ). However, on April 17, 2026, Plaintiff filed its 22 Motion to Unrestrict Case, which was directed at all restricted documents in this matter. On April 20, 2026, the court granted the 22 Motion to Unrestrict Case (ECF No. 23 ), which rendered the 15 Motion for Leave to Restrict moot. Accordingly, the 15 Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. Objections to this order are due within fourteen days. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

   For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry. (sbplc11)

2. Order | Filed: July 01, 2026 | Entered: July 01, 2026 USA v. 637 Sawmill Road, Loveland, Colorado

   Forfeit/Penalty: Other | Colorado

   Order on Motion to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond

   ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on June 30, 2026. Before the court are Claimant Joshua Campbell's 27 Motion for Appointment of Counsel and 28 Motion for Extension. Upon review of the 27 Motion and the docket in this case, this court cannot conclude that appointment of counsel is warranted at this time. The court does not find that the legal issues presented in Plaintiff's claims are so uniquely complex as to justify appointed counsel. "[T]he right to counsel in a civil case is not a matter of constitutional right under the Sixth Amendment." MacCuish v. United States, 844 F.2d 733, 735 (10th Cir. 1988). Further, it is too early for this court to assess the merit of Plaintiff's claims, which is one of the factors that the court is to consider under the local rule establishing the pro bono program, D.C.COLO.LAttyR 15. Thus, Mr. Campbell's 27 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice to refiling after Plaintiff's case moves forward. Mr. Campbell is directed to the court's Order at ECF No. 36 , which notes two resources available to pro se parties. Regarding Mr. Campbell's 28 Motion for Extension of Time, the Motion is GRANTED. Mr. Campbell's answer is now due August 5, 2026. Objections to this order are due within fourteen days. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

   For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry. (sbplc11)

3. 11 additional result(s)