Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Rothstein Law APC
-
Misc | Filed: May 13, 2022 | Entered: May 13, 2022 34 Cabot Holdings, LLC v. Gregory Cargill et al
Contract: Other | California Central
Satisfaction of Judgment
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT re Judgment,,, 345 , Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion for Hearing, Order on Motion in Limine to Exclude 339 entered In favor of 34 Cabot Holdings, LLC Against Gregory Cargill of the CONDITIONAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF FULL SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT filed by Counter Claimants Gregory Cargill, John Furnari, Defendants Gregory Cargill, John Furnari. (Steinberg, Ira)
-
Order | Filed: May 04, 2022 | Entered: May 05, 2022 34 Cabot Holdings, LLC v. Gregory Cargill et al
Contract: Other | California Central
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held
(IN CHAMBERS) DECISION FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL; ORDER RE MOTION RE EXPERT WITNESS ISSUES (DKT. 154 ); MOTION TO EXCLUDE DEFENDANTS' PUTATIVE EXPERT AND/OR PRECLUDE TESTIMONY BEYOND THE SCOPE OF EXPERT REPORT (DKT. 194 ); REQUEST TO EXCLUDE EXHIBITS 65 AND 81 (DKT. 306 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Within 21 days after the issuance of this Order, after meeting and conferring as to a form of judgment, if the parties agree as to the form of the judgment, a proposed judgment, signed as approved as to form by all parties, shall be lodged. If the parties cannot agree on a form of judgment, within the same 21- day period, Plaintiff shall lodge a proposed judgment, and Defendants shall within three days thereafter, file any objections, including a redline that shows the proposed modifications to the form of judgment lodged by Plaintiff. The parties joint and/or respective filings shall also address the appropriate date to be used to calculate prejudgment interest, as well as a basis to keep any portions of this Order under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
-
Order | Filed: May 04, 2022 | Entered: May 05, 2022 34 Cabot Holdings, LLC v. Gregory Cargill et al
Contract: Other | California Central
Order
ORDER RE NOTICE OF LODGING OF: (1) PROPOSED JUDGMENT; AND (2) PROPOSED REDACTED VERSION OF DECISION FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL (DKT. 343 )by Judge John A. Kronstadt 343 . Therefore, the relief requested in the Notice is GRANTED. A redacted version of the Decision Following Bench Trial shall be issued on the public docket; provided, however, that this Order is without prejudice to an application by a non-party to unseal all or certain redactions for good cause shown. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login