Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Stillman Law Office
-
Order | Filed: April 01, 2024 | Entered: April 01, 2024 JOHNSON v. STILLMAN LAW OFFICE
Other Statutes: Consumer Credit | Pennsylvania Eastern
Order Referring Case to Arbitration
ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 53.2, SECTION 4(A), THAT THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION IS HEREWITH REFERRED TO ARBITRATION. THE FOLLOWING CERTIFIED ARBITRATORS HAVE BEEN RANDOMLY SELECTED TO HEAR THIS CASE: CHAIRPERSON: AUTHERINE SMITH-SCHOLL, ESQ. ARBITRATOR: NANCY CAMPBELL, ESQ. ARBITRATOR: JAMES ZACCARIA, ESQ. THE ARBITRATION HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 601 MARKET STREET, COURTROOM 5B, 5TH FLOOR, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19106 AT 9:30 A.M. ON MAY 29, 2024. A NOTICE OF HEARING HAS BEEN EMAILED TO COUNSEL OF RECORD AND THE ARBITRATORS. TRIALS MAY BE RESCHEDULED TO AN EARLIER DATE IF COUNSEL NOTIFIES THE ARBITRATION CLERK BY LETTER, SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL TO PAED_ARBITRATION@PAED.USCOURTS.GOV, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE. REQUESTS MADE MORE THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, OR REQUESTS FOR DATES AFTER THE DATE SET FORTH IN THIS NOTICE, MUST BE FILED ELECTRONICALLY ON CM/ECF FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 3/30/24. 4/1/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
-
Notice | Filed: March 29, 2024 | Entered: March 29, 2024 JOHNSON v. STILLMAN LAW OFFICE
Other Statutes: Consumer Credit | Pennsylvania Eastern
Notice of Hearing
NOTICE of Hearing: ARBITRATION HEARING SET FOR 5/29/2024 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 5B.(rv)
-
Order | Filed: March 28, 2024 | Entered: March 28, 2024 JOHNSON v. STILLMAN LAW OFFICE
Other Statutes: Consumer Credit | Pennsylvania Eastern
Memorandum and/or Opinion Order
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION (DOC. NO. 21) IS DENIED. 2. DEFENDANTS MOTION (DOC. NO. 20) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: A. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS PREMISED ON VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL CODE, THE GRAHAM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT, THE PENNSYLVANIA FAIR CREDIT EXTENSION UNIFORMITY ACT, AND 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692B(1), 1692B(2), 1692B(5), 1692C(A), 1692D(2), 1692E(10), AND 1692J(A). THE COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT IN STILLMAN LAWS FAVOR AS TO THESE CLAIMS. B. THE MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS PREMISED ON VIOLATIONS OF 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692C(C) AND 1692(E)(2)(A). 3. PLAINTIFFS REMAINING CLAIMS ARE REFERRED TO ARBITRATION. THE GARY JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF, V. STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, DEFENDANT. 2 ARBITRATION CLERK SHALL SCHEDULE AN ARBITRATION HEARING. ALL COUNSEL ARE ATTACHED FOR THE ARBITRATION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 3/28/24. 3/28/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login