Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Terrell Marshall
-
Order | Filed: May 02, 2024 In re Roundup Products Liability Litigation
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability | California Northern
Order
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 290: ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERTS HERRICK AND BOYD. Associated Cases: 3:16-md-02741-VC, 3:19-cv-04230-VC, 3:19-cv-04576-VC, 3:20-cv-03108-VC. (crblc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2024)
Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) -
Filed: May 02, 2024 | Entered: May 02, 2024 Havrilla et al v. Centene Corporation et al
470(Racketeer/Corrupt Organization) | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: For the reasons provided in the memorandum opinion and order,Plaintiffs Matthew Havrilla, Cynthia Dawson, Alden Henriksen, Melody DeSchepper, Christopher Tilton, and Mark Hackett ("Plaintiffs") bring this putative class action complaint against Defendants Centene Corporation ("Centene Corp."), Centene Management Company, LLC ("Centene Management"), and Celtic Insurance Company ("Celtic") (collectively, "Defendants") alleging that Defendants have engaged in an unlawful scheme to defraud Plaintiffs in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"). Plaintiffs also bring claims for unjust enrichment and for violation of numerous state consumer protection laws. Defendants have moved to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. 18.) For the reasons stated in this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. In short, Plaintiffs have pled sufficient facts to allege a RICO conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and have adequately established standing to bring claims on behalf of putative class members who reside in states where no named Plaintiff resides. Further, Plaintiffs have stated a claim for relief under each of the state consumer protection acts alleged in the Complaint apart from Nebraska. Plaintiffs' claims under the Nebraska Consumer Protection Act are dismissed. In addition, Plaintiffs' unjust enrichment claim fails as Plaintiffs alleged the existence of an express contract and the Complaint fails to plead unjust enrichment in the alternative. By May 17, 2024, Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies, if possible. (ca, ) (Entered: 05/02/2024)
-
Order | Filed: May 02, 2024 | Entered: May 02, 2024 Reiger v. St. Charles Health System, Inc. et al
Consumer Credit | Oregon
Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 30 admission requested by attorney David M. Schultz. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login