Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Thomas P. Howard LLC
-
Minutes | Filed: June 04, 2024 | Entered: June 05, 2024 Brand Q, Inc. v. All About Uniforms, Inc.
Copyright | Colorado
Motion Hearing Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond Order on Motion to Set Aside
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 6/4/2024 before Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell: Defendant's 39 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond re 39 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re 1 Complaint, and 40 MOTION to Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default are both conditionally GRANTED subject to payment of reasonable fees and costs to account for prejudice to Plaintiff. Plaintiffs counsel shall file a declaration, attaching relevant billing statements,and breaking out all reasonable fees and costs associated with Defendants alleged willfulness. Such declaration shall be filed on or before 6/14/2024. The Court will not set a deadline for Defendant to file an answer or responsive pleading (see post-conference note). FTR: Courtroom 101. (evaug )
-
Order | Filed: June 03, 2024 | Entered: June 03, 2024 Single Path Solutions LLC v. DeliverHealth Solutions, LLC
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) | Massachusetts
Order
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. At the request of the parties, the Court vacates the referral to the magistrate judge for all purposes including trial of this matter pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(3). The parties shall file unredacted courtesy copies of the complaint, along with all supporting exhibits and the motion to dismiss, opposition, reply, and all supporting exhibits. Courtesy copies should be filed by June 6, 2024. (Warnock, Douglas)
-
Order | Filed: May 31, 2024 | Entered: May 31, 2024 Woodley Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lokal Communities, LLC
Copyright | Colorado
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 05/31/2024. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions [#26, #31] are DENIED without prejudice. Amendment of deadlines set in the Scheduling Order [#24] requires good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). This "good cause requirement may be satisfied, for example, if a plaintiff learns new information through discovery[.]" Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C. v. Wells Fargo Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 771 F.3d 1230, 1240 (10th Cir. 2014). While Plaintiff exercised diligence in seeking an extension of the amendment of pleadings deadline before its expiration, the Court finds that the request is premature. Plaintiff may renew its request if it receives discovery on which basis it would like to amend the complaint or join parties.(jrobe, )
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login