Case Activity (225)

1. Order | Filed: August 13, 2026 | Entered: August 13, 2026 Blue v. European Union Central Bank et al

   Other Fraud | Connecticut

   Order

   ORDER. The court has closely reviewed the Complaint with special solicitude in light of the fact that Plaintiff is representing herself in this action. See Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474-75 (2d Cir. 2006) (per curiam). But as the court explains, the Complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend.
   
   A district court may dismiss a case brought in forma pauperis if it determines that "the action or appeal... is frivolous or malicious; [or] fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). "A court may dismiss a claim as 'factually frivolous' only if the sufficiently well-pleaded facts are 'clearly baseless' - that is, if they are 'fanciful,' 'fantastic,' or 'delusional.'" Burton v. USA, No. 21-CV-6238 (LDH)(LB), 2022 WL 1093217, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2022) (quoting Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992)).
   
   The allegations in this Complaint are similar to those alleged in another case brought by Plaintiff in this District, Blue v. Spirit Airlines, No. 26-cv-1058 (SFR). Here, Plaintiff contends she has an ownership interest in Spirit Airlines, and that "the whole transfer of Spirit Airlines Ownership was done illegally by [the] European Central Bank against my best interest." ECF No. 1, at 2. Plaintiff also asserts that she is "a special person of interest to the U.S. Government with national security status." Id. at 3. Here, as in case number 26-cv-1058, the Complaint lists the quadrillions of dollars or euros that Plaintiff says she is owed. The Complaint does not invoke any causes of action, so the court cannot infer whether it has subject-matter jurisdiction. The court therefore dismisses the action sua sponte because the action is factually frivolous, fails to state a claim for relief on which relief can be granted, and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h).
   
   Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint setting forth facts that state a viable claim for relief on or before September 18, 2026. If Plaintiff does not respond by that deadline, the court will close the case.
   
   Signed by Judge Sarah F. Russell on 8/13/2026. (JM)

2. Order | Filed: July 31, 2026 | Entered: July 31, 2026 Blue v. European Union Central Bank et al

   Other Fraud | Connecticut

   Order of Transfer

   ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Sarah F. Russell for all further proceedings.
   Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 07/31/2026. (nk)

3. 223 additional result(s)