Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
U.S. Senate
-
Motion | Filed: April 12, 2024 | Entered: April 12, 2024 Custodia Bank Inc v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors et al
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision | Wyoming
Bill of Costs
BILL OF COSTS filed by Defendant Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C - Affidavit) (Michaelson, Andrew)
-
Order | Filed: March 29, 2024 | Entered: March 29, 2024 Custodia Bank Inc v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors et al
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision | Wyoming
Judgment
JUDGMENT as a matter of law in favor of Defendant Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City against Plaintiff Custodia Bank, Inc. on Plaintiff Custodia's cause of action seeking a writ of mandamus (Claim II), ordering and adjudging that Plaintiff Custodia's petition for review under the Administrative Procedure Act (Claim I) asserted against Defendant Federal Reserve Board of Governors is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, and dismissing Plaintiff Custodia's cause of action for declaratory judgment under the Declaratory Judgment Act (Claim III) by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl.(Court Staff, semt)The AO133 Bill of Cost form is available at https://www.wyd.uscourts.gov/forms/bill-costs. (Copy of order sent to pro se parties via US Mail on this date) Modified text on 3/29/2024 (Court Staff, semt).
-
Order | Filed: March 29, 2024 | Entered: March 29, 2024 Custodia Bank Inc v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors et al
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision | Wyoming
Order on Motion for Judgment Order on Motion for Order Order on Motion for Summary Judgment
ORDER ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's 233 , 238 Petition for Review on its APA Claim and its Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on its Statutory Mandamus Claim is DENIED. Plaintiff's petition for review under the APA alleged against Defendant Board of Governors (Claim I) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Defendant FRBKC's 272 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment as a matter of law is granted in Defendant FRBKC's favor and against Plaintiff on the statutory mandamus claim (Claim II). Plaintiff's cause of action requesting declaratory judgment (Claim III) is DISMISSED. Defendant FRBKC's 267 Motion to Strike Reports and Exclude Testimony of Professor Peter Conti-Brown and 269 Motion to Strike Reports and Exclude the Testimony of Katie S. Cox are DENIED AS MOOT. See order for details. (Copy of order sent to pro se parties via US Mail on this date) (Court Staff, semt)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login