Appellate

  • March 02, 2026

    5th Circ. Presses McDermott Shareholders On Direct Claim

    A Fifth Circuit panel wanted to know why investors should get another shot at a direct class action alleging that McDermott International Inc. made misrepresentations about a $6 billion merger, asking Monday if the case before the court was "analogous" to a case alleging the company overpaid for the merger.

  • March 02, 2026

    Undisclosed Witnesses Can Be Excluded, Florida Panel Says

    A Florida state appeals court upheld $8.25 million in damages awarded to the estate of a biker killed in a DUI collision, although a full judge panel certified a conflict regarding late-filed witness testimony after ruling that lower courts aren't required to consider whether such evidence harms opposing parties. 

  • March 02, 2026

    Trucking Group Defends $21M Atty Fee Bid In RI Tolls Fight

    The commercial trucking industry's lead trade group has argued it's entitled to $21 million in attorney fees as it staunchly objected to a Rhode Island federal magistrate judge's recommendation that its request be slashed to $2.7 million in long-running litigation over the state's truck tolling program.

  • March 02, 2026

    4 Things That Likely Sealed Fate Of SCOTUSblog Founder

    When 12 "guilty" verdicts were read aloud by the jury in SCOTUSblog founder Thomas Goldstein's tax evasion and mortgage fraud trial last week, it was the culmination of a 16-day trial that took jurors deep into Goldstein's ultra high-stakes poker playing, his lavish lifestyle and his former law firm's accounting. Here, Law360 looks at four key pieces of evidence that likely moved jurors to their decision.

  • March 02, 2026

    Worker's Heart Issues Can't Save Vax Bias Suit, 5th Circ. Says

    The Fifth Circuit declined to revive a worker's bias suit claiming he was forced out of an oil and gas services company because his heart condition prevented him from complying with its COVID-19 vaccine mandate, ruling his case falls flat because his heart issues don't amount to a disability.

  • March 02, 2026

    Ex-Chipotle Worker Can't Rebut Roach Rationale In Firing Suit

    The Tenth Circuit on Monday refused to reopen a former Chipotle manager's lawsuit claiming he was fired because he was in his 50s, saying he couldn't overcome the fast casual restaurant chain's argument that he was let go because of a cockroach infestation.

  • March 02, 2026

    5th Circ. Judge Flags 'Pretty Extreme' Timing Of Barista Firing

    A Fifth Circuit judge said on Monday that the timing of Starbucks' firing of a California barista was "pretty extreme" and that management's words about benefits "do matter" as the court weighed the coffee giant's bid to overturn two unfavorable rulings by the National Labor Relations Board.

  • March 02, 2026

    3rd Circ. Unsure Criticism Of Prof's DEI Stance Is Defamation

    A Third Circuit panel on Monday questioned whether the retraction of a former University of Pittsburgh program director's article criticizing diversity, equity and inclusion was a purely academic debate the courts should avoid, or if statements that it "misrepresented" facts were enough to sustain defamation claims.

  • March 02, 2026

    Tech Co. Tells 3rd Circ. Plenty Alleged To Revive IP Suit

    A New Jersey software company urged the Third Circuit on Monday to revive its suit against a traffic technology company over the alleged unlicensed use of one of its products, arguing that there were enough facts in its complaint to survive a motion to dismiss.

  • March 02, 2026

    Supreme Court Seems To Favor Gun Rights For Pot User

    U.S. Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Monday of government arguments that barring marijuana users from owning guns is legal, pointing out that the government's chosen historical analog, laws disarming drunks, only applied to gun owners who were regularly dangerously intoxicated — qualities not necessarily present in modern cannabis users.

  • March 02, 2026

    Mass. Justices Weigh Handgun Age Law After Top Court Case

    Massachusetts' highest court on Monday considered whether a blanket prohibition on handgun possession by anyone under 21 is unconstitutional, in a case that reflects the ongoing fallout from a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that sharply limited the circumstances under which a license to carry can be denied.

  • March 02, 2026

    Fed. Circ. Quickly Releases Mandate In Trump Tariff Case

    Businesses and states that successfully challenged President Donald Trump's global tariff regime can proceed with their efforts to seek refunds, as the Federal Circuit expedited the release of its mandate in the case to the U.S. Court of International Trade on Monday.

  • March 02, 2026

    7th Circ. Urged To Nix Wisconsin Homeowners' Tax Appeal

    A Wisconsin school district is asking the Seventh Circuit to reject an appeal by a group of homeowners that claims the Menominee Indian Tribe joined forces with it and other municipalities to increase their tax burden, arguing that the property owners' claims are not redressable in the federal court.

  • March 02, 2026

    1st Circ. Probes Regulatory Authority Of US Fishing Boards

    First Circuit judges quizzed a fishing industry group on Monday on the powers of federal regional councils for commercial fishing, as the group seeks to undo haddock fishing limits for the New England coast. 

  • March 02, 2026

    Fla. Gov. Elevates Tallahassee Judge To Appeals Bench

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis appointed a Tallahassee trial court judge to the First District Court of Appeal bench Monday.

  • March 02, 2026

    Sotomayor Blasts Justices' Refusal To Hear Prisoner Fee Fight

    The U.S. Supreme Court's three liberal justices on Monday disagreed with the court's denial of review in a petition by a trio of former California prisoners who challenged lower court rulings requiring each of them to pay a separate $350 filing fee to pursue a joint civil rights lawsuit.

  • March 02, 2026

    11th Circ. Says Court Can Enforce Restitution After Probation

    A district court retains jurisdiction to enforce the payment of court-ordered restitution even after a criminal defendant has finished serving probation, the Eleventh Circuit ruled Monday in the case against a former IMG Worldwide employee who sold unauthorized tickets for the Sony Open tennis tournament.

  • March 02, 2026

    NC Woman Appeals Criminal Contempt After Atty Assault Trial

    A woman who claims an attorney drunkenly punched her in the face in a hotel lobby is urging a North Carolina appeals court to undo her jail sentence, arguing that a trial judge wrongly found her in contempt of court after she accidentally violated hearsay rules while testifying.

  • March 02, 2026

    6th Circ. Upholds 12-Year Stint For Mich. Doc In 'Pill Mill' Case

    The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions and 12-year prison sentence of a Michigan doctor accused of operating a cash-only "pill mill" that wrote thousands of opioid prescriptions, holding that the trial judge properly handled the jury instructions and key evidentiary rulings.

  • March 02, 2026

    Rent Commissions Shouldn't Be 'Gutless,' Conn. Justices Told

    Two landlords on Monday asked the Connecticut Supreme Court to allow evictions to advance without interference from Hartford's and Middletown's fair rent commissions, urging the justices to establish boundaries one legal aid attorney said would result in a "gutless administrative body."

  • March 02, 2026

    DOJ Drops Law Firm Executive Order Appeals

    The Trump administration told the D.C. Circuit on Monday that it is dropping its fight over executive orders targeting four law firms.

  • March 02, 2026

    Ga. Justices To Weigh Ex-Judge's Resignation In Ethics Case

    The Georgia Supreme Court is digging into whether a former state judge's recent resignation spells the end of her disciplinary case after the investigative panel of a judicial ethics commission told the justices that it wants to consider sanctions other than removal.

  • March 02, 2026

    Georgia Judge Fights Removal Based On 'Vague' Ethics Rule

    A Georgia probate judge asked the state's Supreme Court to spare him from being removed from the bench, arguing that a judicial ethics watchdog is enforcing a vague rule in concluding that he isn't competent while he deals with a backlog of cases.

  • March 02, 2026

    Pot Farm Says 6th Circ. Shouldn't Nix $32M Curaleaf Verdict

    Hello Farms Licensing MI LLC is urging a Sixth Circuit panel not to undo its nearly $32 million win in a contract suit against units of cannabis giant Curaleaf, saying the fact that cannabis is federally illegal doesn't render the contract void.

  • March 02, 2026

    Minn. Tax Court Erred In Valuing Hotel, Minn. Justices Told

    The Minnesota Tax Court improperly lowered the value of a Minneapolis hotel and convention center and should not have disregarded the minimum assessment agreement that existed between the county and the property owner, the county told the Minnesota Supreme Court.

Expert Analysis

  • Class Actions At The Circuit Courts: January Lessons

    Author Photo

    In this month's review of class action appeals, Mitchell Engel at Shook Hardy discusses five rulings from October and November, and identifies practice tips from cases involving consumer fraud, oil and gas leases, toxic torts, and wage and hour issues.

  • Series

    Judges On AI: How Judicial Use Informs Guardrails

    Author Photo

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell at the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado discusses why having a sense of how generative AI tools behave, where they add value, where they introduce risk and how they are reshaping the practice of law is key for today's judges.

  • Evenflo IP Ruling Shows Evidence Is Still Key For Injunctions

    Author Photo

    Notwithstanding renewed policy and doctrinal attention to patent injunctions, the Federal Circuit's December decision in Wonderland v. Evenflo signals that the era of easily obtained patent injunctions has not yet arrived, say attorneys at King & Wood.

  • Justices' Med Mal Ruling May Spur Huge Shift For Litigators

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in the medical malpractice suit Berk v. Choy, holding that a Florida procedural requirement does not apply to medical malpractice claims filed in federal court, is likely to encourage eligible parties to file claims in federal court, speed the adjudicatory process and create both opportunities and challenges for litigators, says Thomas Kroeger at Colson Hicks.

  • Challenging Restitution Orders After Supreme Court Decision

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s Ellingburg v. U.S. decision from last week, holding that mandatory restitution is a criminal punishment subject to the Sixth Amendment, means that all challenges to restitution are now fair game if the amount is not alleged in the indictment, say Mark Allenbaugh at SentencingStats.com and Doug Passon at Doug Passon Law.

  • State Of Insurance: Q4 Notes From Pennsylvania

    Author Photo

    Last quarter in Pennsylvania, a Superior Court ruling underscored the centrality of careful policy drafting and judicial scrutiny of exclusionary language, and another provided practical guidance on the calculation of attorney fees and interest in bad faith cases, while a proposed bill endeavored to cover insurance gaps for homeowners, says Todd Leon at Marshall Dennehey.

  • Justices' Double Jeopardy Ruling May Limit Charge-Stacking

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent holding in Barrett v. U.S. that the double jeopardy clause bars separate convictions for the same act under two related firearms laws places meaningful limits on the broader practice of stacking charges, a reminder that overlapping statutes present prosecutors with a menu, not a buffet, says attorney David Tarras.

  • How 2025 Recalibrated Fair Use For The AI Era

    Author Photo

    Although the Second Circuit's decision last year in Romanova v. Amilus Inc. did not involve artificial intelligence, its formulation of relevant fair use factors provides a useful guide for lower courts examining AI cases in 2026, demanding close attention from legal practitioners on both sides of these disputes, say attorneys at Cleary.

  • Series

    Adapting To Private Practice: 5 Tips From Ex-SEC Unit Chief

    Author Photo

    My move to private practice has reaffirmed my belief in the value of adaptability, collaboration and strategic thinking — qualities that are essential not only for successful client outcomes, but also for sustained professional satisfaction, says Dabney O’Riordan at Fried Frank.

  • 5 Drug Pricing Policy Developments To Watch In 2026

    Author Photo

    2026 may prove to be a critical year for drug pricing in the U.S., with potential major shifts including several legislative initiatives moving forward after being in the works for years, and more experimentation on the horizon concerning GLP-1s and Section 340B pricing, say attorneys at Manatt.

  • 2026 Int'l Arbitration Trends: Awards Against Sovereign States

    Author Photo

    The enforcement of arbitral awards against sovereign states is one of the most contentious and rapidly evolving areas in international arbitration, with three defining issues on the 2026 horizon: the scope of sovereign immunity, assignability of rights, and availability of fraud and corruption defenses, say attorneys at Cleary.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: How To Start A Law Firm

    Author Photo

    Launching and sustaining a law firm requires skills most law schools don't teach, but every lawyer should understand a few core principles that can make the leap calculated rather than reckless, says Sam Katz at Athlaw.

  • Opinion

    What Justices Got Right In Candidate Standing Ruling

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's decision this month in Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections broadens standing for candidates challenging state election rules, marking a welcome shift from other decisions that have impeded access to federal courts, says Daniel Tokaji at the University of Wisconsin Law School.

  • Justices' Med Mal Ruling May Hurt Federal Anti-SLAPP Suits

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Berk v. Choy restricts the application of certain state laws in diversity actions in federal court — and while the ruling concerned affidavit requirements in medical malpractice suits, it may also affect the use of anti-SLAPP statutes in federal litigation, says Travis Chance at Brownstein Hyatt.

  • Fed. Circ. Patent Decisions In 2025: An Empirical Review

    Author Photo

    In 2025, the Federal Circuit's increased output was not enough to keep up with its ever-growing patent case load, and patent owners and applicants fared poorly overall as the court's affirmance rate fell, says Dan Bagatell at Perkins Coie.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Appellate archive.