Appellate

  • October 22, 2025

    Lyft Escapes Liability In Fla. Motorcycle Crash Suit

    A Florida appeals court ruled Wednesday that a Florida law regulating Lyft and other ride-hailing companies bars negligence claims against the company brought by the family of a motorcycle rider left disabled after being hit by a Lyft driver.

  • October 22, 2025

    3rd Circ. Says Burford Can't Arbitrate German Discovery Fight

    The Third Circuit affirmed on Wednesday that a petition filed under a foreign discovery statute targeting Burford Capital in a dispute relating to German antitrust litigation can't be sent to arbitration, saying the funder cited the wrong section of the Federal Arbitration Act.

  • October 22, 2025

    State AGs Push Back In First Amendment Subpoena Fight

    A coalition of state attorneys general is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to safeguard their fundamental investigative authority, warning in an amicus brief filed Tuesday that a New Jersey anti-abortion center's challenge could allow subpoenaed entities to routinely bypass state courts and tie up enforcement actions in federal litigation.

  • October 22, 2025

    Sony Can't Exit Suit Over Singer Jameson Rodgers' Beer Toss

    Sony must face a suit over injuries suffered by a concertgoer hit by an unopened beer can tossed from the stage by country singer Jameson Rodgers, saying the injured woman plausibly alleged that the record label did business with the singer in regard to live performances.

  • October 22, 2025

    4th Circ. Seems Wary Of Under Armour's $100M Coverage Win

    The Fourth Circuit didn't seem convinced Wednesday that it should affirm a lower court's finding that government investigations into Under Armour are unrelated to a securities class action against the sportswear company and thus trigger an additional $100 million in directors and officers coverage from Under Armour's excess insurers.

  • October 22, 2025

    Trump's Takeover Of Calif. Guard 'Unreviewable,' 9th Circ. Told

    A U.S. Department of Justice attorney told the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday that President Donald Trump's federalization of the California National Guard in June is "unreviewable" by the courts, while an attorney for California said the president's order is reviewable and far exceeded his statutory authority.

  • October 22, 2025

    Mass. Inmate's Claim Over Denied Photocopies Can Continue

    A transgender woman incarcerated at a men's prison, where she was allegedly illegally denied photocopies needed to fight her murder conviction, shouldn't have her suit against the Massachusetts Department of Justice dismissed, the state's intermediate-level appeals court ruled Wednesday, saying that her rights were potentially violated.

  • October 22, 2025

    Gilstrap, Albright Flouting Venue Law, Fed. Circ. Told

    The Federal Circuit is being asked to step in and decide if two well-known Texas federal judges, U.S. District Judges Rodney Gilstrap and Alan Albright, have been flouting patent venue law by refusing to transfer out infringement cases if any step of the patented method was performed in their section of the Lone Star State.

  • October 22, 2025

    Court Scraps $2.7M Crash Verdict Over Doc's Trial Testimony

    A Florida appeals court on Tuesday reversed a $2.7 million jury award in an auto collision case, finding that the trial court erred by allowing undisclosed expert testimony from a treating physician regarding the plaintiff's future medical expenses.

  • October 22, 2025

    Airline Groups Ask 5th Circ. To Ground In-Flight Death Suit

    Airline industry trade groups told the Fifth Circuit that airlines should have the flexibility to assess and respond to passengers' in-flight medical emergencies, not be subjected to a rigid, one-size-fits all rule when there are myriad complicating factors that might influence their response.

  • October 22, 2025

    NJ Justices To Hear 3rd Circ.'s UIM Coverage Questions

    New Jersey's justices will help the Third Circuit consider whether a resident can recover up to the full $2 million limit in his employer's auto policy with Zurich rather than its $15,000 limit for underinsured motorists, the New Jersey Supreme Court announced Wednesday, taking up two certified questions.

  • October 22, 2025

    UBS Urges Justices Not To Revive Retaliation Case Again

    UBS Securities is urging the U.S. Supreme Court not to revive, for a second time, a fired worker's whistleblower retaliation lawsuit, arguing that lower courts should be allowed to consider questions about jury instructions regarding the meaning of "contributing factor" in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act before the high court weighs in.

  • October 22, 2025

    Judge Tosses Ingenus Suit Over Leukemia Treatment Patent

    A Delaware federal judge has agreed to throw out a lawsuit accusing Hetero Labs Ltd. of infringing a patent covering a treatment for lymphoma and leukemia, pointing out that an Illinois federal court in a separate case already found the patent to be invalid.

  • October 22, 2025

    Ohio Supreme Court Says Juror Was Impartial In Rape Trial

    An Ohio Supreme Court majority, in rejecting a man's appeal of his rape conviction, ruled Wednesday that criminal defendants seeking to prove juror bias must demonstrate that specific jurors have an "irrational or unshakable bias" and a complete unwillingness to apply the law impartially.

  • October 22, 2025

    Texas Appeals Court Wipes $64M Judgment For Dallas Lender

    A Texas appellate court wiped away a $64 million award to the subsidiary of a Dallas investment company following alleged fraud by Credit Suisse surrounding lending for a luxury Nevada community, saying the lower court improperly found that the subsidiary could collect damages above zero dollars.

  • October 22, 2025

    Feds Urge Justices To Back Machinists Fund In Pension Fight

    The federal government wrote in support of trustees of an International Association of Machinists pension fund in a dispute with employers at the U.S. Supreme Court, backing the union's argument that a pension plan actuary could change the methods and assumptions used to calculate withdrawal payments.

  • October 22, 2025

    NJ Panel Hints Affordable Housing Rules Fight Is Moot

    A New Jersey appellate panel questioned on Wednesday whether 28 towns' challenge to interim affordable housing rules might become moot, as permanent regulations are expected within two months — but municipal attorneys argued the current rules have already forced planning decisions that could be upended.

  • October 22, 2025

    6th Circ. Backs Lordstown Execs In Failed Foxconn Deal Suit

    The Sixth Circuit has upheld the dismissal of a suit claiming former executives of Lordstown Motors Corp. misled investors about the state of a partnership with Foxconn Technology Group, finding leaders' optimism about the ultimately failed deal wasn't intentionally false.

  • October 22, 2025

    Presidential Firing Limits Fight Builds At High Court

    The ousted U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board chair has encouraged the U.S. Supreme Court to include a caveat for "legislative courts" if it overturns precedent that empowers Congress to limit the president's authority to fire certain agency officials, but opponents of independent agencies want a clean break from the status quo. 

  • October 22, 2025

    3rd Circ. Tosses Elderly Woman's Solar Panels Fraud Suit

    The Third Circuit on Wednesday backed the dismissal of an elderly woman's fraud claims against two solar panel financiers, which she accused of saddling her with a nearly $100,000 debt after she was tricked getting rooftop solar panels a salesperson told her were free.

  • October 22, 2025

    Obstetrician's Win Upheld In 'Outrageous Terminology' Suit

    A Georgia Court of Appeals on Wednesday upheld a trial court's decision that an Atlanta obstetrician's allegedly "outrageous terminology" wasn't "extreme and dangerous," and that she didn't intentionally inflict emotional distress when she told a couple their stillborn child had been "decapitated" during delivery.  

  • October 22, 2025

    OCC Drops $10M Fine, Ban In Wells Fargo Ex-Exec Deal

    The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has agreed to end a long-running case accusing a former Wells Fargo risk officer of failing to prevent the bank's fake accounts scandal, striking a deal that drops its pursuit of a $10 million fine and industry ban.

  • October 22, 2025

    NJ Justices To Review Judicial Privacy Law For 3rd Circ. Case

    The New Jersey Supreme Court has agreed to a request from the Third Circuit to interpret whether the judicial privacy measure Daniel's Law requires a certain mental state in order to establish liability.

  • October 22, 2025

    Straight Path Class Attys Appeal $1.2B Damage Claim Toss

    An attorney for Straight Path Communications shareholders told Delaware's justices Wednesday the state Supreme Court should revive a $1.2 billion claim tied to company controller Howard Jonas' allegedly self-interested role in shutting down a board special committee's pursuit of damages against him.

  • October 22, 2025

    Feds Fight Early Release For Atty Convicted Of $550M Fraud

    Federal prosecutors on Tuesday opposed compassionate release of a Kentucky lawyer who fled the country after pleading guilty to a $550 million Social Security fraud scheme, telling the Sixth Circuit that the lawyer's medical conditions are being adequately treated in prison and the seriousness of his crimes warranted more time behind bars.

Expert Analysis

  • Opinion

    IRS Should Work With Industry On Microcaptive Regs

    Author Photo

    The IRS should engage with microcaptive insurance owners to develop better regulations on these arrangements or risk the emergence of common law guidance as taxpayers with legitimate programs seek relief in the federal courts, says Dustin Carlson at SRA 831(b) Admin.

  • FLSA Interpretation Patterns Emerge 1 Year After Loper Bright

    Author Photo

    One year after the U.S. Supreme Court's monumental decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, four distinct avenues of judicial decision-making have taken shape among lower courts that are responding to their newfound freedom in interpreting the Fair Labor Standards Act through U.S. Department of Labor regulations, say attorneys at Kutak Rock.

  • A Pattern Emerges In Justices' Evaluation Of Veteran Statute

    Author Photo

    The recent Soto v. U.S. decision that the statute of limitations for certain military-related claims does not apply to combat-related special compensation exemplifies the U.S. Supreme Court's view, emerging in two other recent opinions, that it is a reviewing court's obligation to determine the best interpretation of the language used by Congress, says attorney Kenneth Carpenter.

  • Fed. Circ. In May: Evaluating Opportunistic Trademark Filings

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's decision last month in the "US Space Force" trademark case gives the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board additional clarity when working through opportunistic trademark filings, particularly when the mark's value is primarily due to the potential value of a false connection, say attorneys at Knobbe Martens.

  • Opinion

    Senate's 41% Litigation Finance Tax Would Hurt Legal System

    Author Photo

    The Senate’s latest version of the Big Beautiful Bill Act would impose a 41% tax on the litigation finance industry, but the tax is totally disconnected from the concerns it purports to address, and it would set the country back to a time when small plaintiffs had little recourse against big defendants, says Anthony Sebok at Cardozo School of Law.

  • Drawbacks For Taxpayers From Justices' Levy Dispute Ruling

    Author Photo

    The Supreme Court's June decision in Commissioner v. Zuch, holding the Tax Court lacks jurisdiction to resolve disputes where the IRS has stopped pursuing a levy, may require taxpayers to explore new tactics for mitigating the increased difficulty of appealing their liability via collection due process hearings, says Matthew Roberts at Meadows Collier.

  • In NRC Ruling, Justices Affirm Hearing Process Still Matters

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas safeguards the fairness, clarity and predictability of the regulatory system by affirming that to challenge an agency's decision in court, litigants must first meaningfully participate in the hearing process that Congress and the agency have established, says Jonathan Rund at the Nuclear Energy Institute.

  • What Baseball Can Teach Criminal Attys About Rule Of Lenity

    Author Photo

    Judges tend to assess ambiguous criminal laws not unlike how baseball umpires approach checked swings, so defense attorneys should consider how to best frame their arguments to maximize courts' willingness to invoke the rule of lenity, wherein a tie goes to the defendant, says Jonathan Porter at Husch Blackwell.

  • Tips For Litigating Apex Doctrine Disputes Amid Controversy

    Author Photo

    Litigants once took for granted that deposition requests of high-ranking corporate officers required a greater showing of need than for lower-level witnesses, but the apex doctrine has proven controversial in recent years, and fights over such depositions will be won by creative lawyers adapting their arguments to this particular moment, say attorneys at Hangley Aronchick.

  • Series

    Performing As A Clown Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    To say that being a clown in the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade has changed my legal career would truly be an understatement — by creating an opening to converse on a unique topic, it has allowed me to connect with clients, counsel and even judges on a deeper level, says Charles Tatelbaum at Tripp Scott.

  • 9th Circ. Ruling Is Turning Point For Private Funds In 401(k)s

    Author Photo

    The Ninth Circuit's decision in Anderson v. Intel reinforces that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act's duty of prudence permits fiduciaries to use private market assets in diversified funds, yet it also exposes the persistent litigation and regulatory uncertainties that continue to temper wider adoption in 401(k) plans, say attorneys at Debevoise.

  • Perspectives

    Justices' Sentencing Ruling Is More Of A Ripple Than A Wave

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last week in Esteras v. U.S., limiting the factors that lower courts may consider in imposing prison sentences for supervised release violations, is symbolically important, but its real-world impact will likely be muted for several reasons, say attorneys at Perkins Coie.

  • DOJ Atty Firing Highlights Tension Between 2 Ethical Duties

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Department of Justice's recent firing of a prosecutor-turned-whistleblower involved in the Abrego Garcia v. Noem case illustrates the tricky balancing act between zealous client advocacy and a lawyer’s duty of candor to the court, which many clients fail to appreciate, says David Atkins at Yale Law School.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Rejecting Biz Dev Myths

    Author Photo

    Law schools don’t spend sufficient time dispelling certain myths that prevent young lawyers from exploring new business opportunities, but by dismissing these misguided beliefs, even an introverted first-year associate with a small network of contacts can find long-term success, says Ronald Levine at Herrick Feinstein.

  • Trade In Limbo: The Legal Storm Reshaping Trump's Tariffs

    Author Photo

    In the final days of May, decisions in two significant court actions upended the tariff and trade landscape, so until the U.S. Supreme Court rules, businesses and supply chains should expect tariffs to remain in place, and for the Trump administration to continue pursuing and enforcing all available trade policies, say attorneys at Ice Miller.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Appellate archive.