Appellate

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Will Not Review Question Of Credit Union's Liability

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a petition to overturn a Fourth Circuit ruling that found banks cannot be held liable for fraudulent fund transfers made from their accounts without having "actual knowledge" that there were discrepancies between the intended beneficiary and the account receiving the deposit.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Deny Certiorari In Auditor's $1.5M Retaliation Suit

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Axos Bank's petition challenging a $1.5 million award to a former auditor who claimed he was fired for whistleblowing, rejecting a matter that concerns how companies defend against such retaliation claims.

  • October 06, 2025

    High Court Refuses To Review Revived SAP Tying Claims

    The U.S. Supreme Court denied a request on Monday from German software giant SAP to review a ruling that revived Teradata's antitrust claims over the alleged tying of software and database products.

  • October 06, 2025

    High Court Turns Down 6 Patent Cases At Start Of Term

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected six petitions in patent-related cases, taking some of its first actions on intellectual property matters this term.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Seek US Opinion On $419M Arbitration Question

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday requested that the federal government weigh in on Spain's petition challenging a D.C. Circuit decision laying a path to enforce some $419.45 million in arbitral awards against it, a case that the country argues raises two questions of "critical importance" for foreign sovereigns.

  • October 06, 2025

    High Court Passes On Halkbank's Immunity Claims

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up Halkbank's claims that it has common-law foreign sovereign immunity from criminal charges alleging the bank laundered about $1 billion in sanctioned Iranian oil proceeds.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Won't Review Blacklisting Case Against LegitScript

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to review a bid from LegitScript to duck an antitrust case accusing it of blacklisting a drug price checking website despite contentions that it facilitates illegal imports of prescription drugs.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Won't Hear Nissan Sunroof Defect Class Spat

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up Nissan North America Inc.'s bid to unravel certified classes of drivers alleging the automaker sold vehicles with defective panoramic sunroofs, a case that sought additional clarity on standards that might allow uninjured plaintiffs to pursue class claims against corporate defendants.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Won't Review Ex-BigLaw Atty's OneCoin Conviction

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a former Locke Lord LLP partner's appeal of his conviction and prison sentence for helping launder roughly $400 million in proceeds from the infamous OneCoin cryptocurrency scheme.

  • October 06, 2025

    High Court Rejects USAA Appeal Over Patent Invalidations

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to review the invalidation of two USAA patents in litigation against PNC Bank after USAA argued the Federal Circuit blessed a contradictory ruling in a nearly identical patent review.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Decline Case Over Scope Of Forced Arbitration Ban

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to wade into a former employee's legal battle with CVS despite the worker's claim that the justices need to clarify key terms in a 3-year-old federal law banning mandatory arbitration of employment-related sex harassment claims.

  • October 06, 2025

    High Court Won't Take Up NY Tribal Eel Fishing Regs Dispute

    The U.S. Supreme Court won't take up a Long Island tribe's petition that looks to undo a Second Circuit order that rejected its challenge to New York's regulations on eel fishing harvests, which argued that if the decision is upheld, it would give district courts gatekeeping roles on expert testimony.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Reject Case Over Legal Client's Lawsuit Threat

    The U.S. Supreme Court Monday refused to take up a case by a man who argued that his threat to sue his civil lawyer for malpractice created an automatic conflict of interest when the same lawyer was also defending him in a criminal case.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Deny 'Space Force' TM Appeal From IP Atty

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday skipped an appeal from an attorney who said a 2018 speech from President Donald Trump was the inspiration for his attempt to register "US Space Force" as a trademark. 

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Skip Fight Over NJ Healthcare Worker Vax Mandate

    The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday it won't review the challenge by four New Jersey nurses to New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy's executive orders in the first three months of 2022 mandating a COVID-19 vaccine booster for healthcare workers.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Deny Aviation Co.'s Appeal Over TM Trial Rights

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from a personal aviation company that raised the question of whether parties in trademark infringement cases still have a right to a jury trial when seeking an accounting of profits as the monetary remedy rather than damages.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Turn Away BDO's Auditor Fraud Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it would not hear a case that BDO USA LLP claimed could set a "dangerous precedent" for public-company auditors, leaving intact a Second Circuit decision allowing the securities fraud suit against the accounting firm to move forward.

  • October 06, 2025

    Slack Investor Won't Get 2nd Shot Before High Court

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a Slack Technologies investor's petition for the justices to hear his fraud dispute for the second time in two years, leaving intact a Ninth Circuit ruling that the case against the messaging software company was impossible to salvage under the 2023 high court ruling.

  • October 06, 2025

    Supreme Court Rejects Wash. State Climate Law Challenge

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected Ohio-based Invenergy Thermal LLC's challenge to Washington state's Climate Commitment Act, which the company alleged illegally favors in-state power providers.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Won't Weigh If Home Care Travel Time Compensable

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to review whether the time that home health aides spend traveling between clients' homes is compensable in a case brought by the U.S. Department of Labor.

  • October 06, 2025

    Justices Skip TM Dispute Over Pink Color In Hip Implants

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined a German medical supplier's appeal challenging a Federal Circuit conclusion that the color pink in a hip joint implant part is not protectable trade dress because its purpose is functional.

  • October 03, 2025

    Up First At High Court: Election Laws & Conversion Therapy

    The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in six cases during the first week of its October 2025 term, including in disputes over federal candidates' ability to challenge state election laws, Colorado's ban on conversion therapy, and the ability of a landlord to sue the U.S. Postal Service for allegedly refusing to deliver mail. 

  • October 03, 2025

    1st Circ. Keeps Block On Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order

    The First Circuit on Friday upheld blocks on President Donald Trump's executive order aiming to limit birthright citizenship, ruling in a sweeping 100-page opinion that the president's order is likely unconstitutional.

  • October 03, 2025

    6th Circ. Says FirstEnergy's Bribery Probe Docs Are Privileged

    The Sixth Circuit on Friday vacated a district court's order forcing FirstEnergy to disclose to investors its internal investigation materials amid a $1 billion bribery scandal involving an Ohio lawmaker, ruling that the materials were "clearly" protected by the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine. 

  • October 03, 2025

    Lost Mail No Excuse, 3rd Circ. Rules When Ending Suit

    A woman's slip-and-fall lawsuit against the U.S. Postal Service was properly ended as untimely, the Third Circuit ruled on Friday, rejecting arguments that the carrier failed to deliver a critical notice to the plaintiff's attorney, causing the suit to be filed late, and ruling that the government's only responsibility was to mail the letter.

Expert Analysis

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Learning From Failure

    Author Photo

    While law school often focuses on the importance of precision, correctness and perfection, mistakes are inevitable in real-world practice — but failure is not the opposite of progress, and real talent comes from the ability to recover, rethink and reshape, says Brooke Pauley at Tucker Ellis.

  • Eye Drop Ruling Clarifies Importance Of Patent Phrasing

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's recent ruling in Eye Therapies v. Slayback, rejecting the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's interpretation of "consisting essentially of," highlights the importance of using clear and consistent terms throughout a patent's filing history to shield it against future challenges, says Liliana Di Nola-Baron at Panitch Schwarze.

  • Midyear Rewind: How Courts Are Reshaping VPPA Standards

    Author Photo

    The first half of 2025 saw a series of cases interpreting the Video Privacy Protection Act as applied to website tracking technologies, including three appellate rulings deepening circuit splits on what qualifies as personally identifiable information and who qualifies as a consumer under the statute, say attorneys at Perkins Coie.

  • How Justices' Ruling On NEPA Reviews Is Playing Out

    Author Photo

    Since the U.S. Supreme Court's May decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, narrowing the scope of agencies' required reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act, the effects of the ruling are starting to become visible in the actions of lower courts and the agencies themselves, say attorneys at Saul Ewing.

  • Series

    Adapting To Private Practice: From ATF Director To BigLaw

    Author Photo

    As a two-time boomerang partner, returning to BigLaw after stints as a U.S. attorney and the director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, people ask me how I know when to move on, but there’s no single answer — just clearly set your priorities, says Steven Dettelbach at BakerHostetler.

  • Reverse Bias Rulings Offer Warning About DEI Quotas

    Author Photo

    Several recent holdings confirm that targeted or quota-based diversity programs can substantiate reverse discrimination claims, especially when coupled with an adverse action, so employers should exercise caution before implementing such policies in order to mitigate litigation risk, says Noah Bunzl at Tarter Krinsky.

  • 4th Circ. Favors Plain Meaning In Bump-Up D&O Ruling

    Author Photo

    The Fourth Circuit's latest denial of indemnity coverage in Towers Watson v. National Union Fire Insurance and its previous ruling in this case lay out a pragmatic approach to bump-up provisions that avoids hypertechnical constructions to limit the effect of a policy's plain meaning, say attorneys at Kennedys.

  • A Look At Key 5th Circ. White Collar Rulings So Far This Year

    Author Photo

    In the first half of 2025, the Fifth Circuit has decided numerous cases of particular import to white collar practitioners, which collectively underscore the critical importance of meticulous recordbuilding, procedural compliance and strategic litigation choices at every stage of a case, says Joe Magliolo at Jackson Walker.

  • High Court Cert Spotlights Varying Tests For Federal Removal

    Author Photo

    A recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to review Chevron v. Plaquemines Parish, a case involving the federal officer removal statute, highlights three other recent circuit court decisions raising federal removal questions, and serves as a reminder that defendants are the masters of removal actions, says Varun Aery at Hollingsworth.

  • Rule 23 Class Certification Matters In Settlements, Too

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. CASA Inc. highlighted requirements for certifying classes for litigation in federal court, but counsel must also understand how Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may affect certifying classes for settlement purposes, say attorneys at Sidley.

  • Contract Disputes Recap: Privity, Pressure, Procedural Traps

    Author Photo

    Three recent decisions from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims offer fresh lessons for contractors navigating the procedural edge of Contract Disputes Act litigation, says Zachary Jacobson at Seyfarth.

  • Series

    Playing Baseball Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Playing baseball in college, and now Wiffle ball in a local league, has taught me that teamwork, mental endurance and emotional intelligence are not only important to success in the sport, but also to success as a trial attorney, says Kevan Dorsey at Swift Currie.

  • 3rd Circ. Bias Ruling Offers Safety Policy Exception Lessons

    Author Photo

    The Third Circuit's decision in Smith v. City of Atlantic City, partially reinstating a religious bias suit over a policy requiring firefighters to be clean-shaven, cautions employers on the legal risk of including practical or discretionary exceptions in safety procedures, say Joseph Quinn and Mark Schaeffer at Cozen O'Connor.

  • APA Relief May Blunt Justices' Universal Injunction Ruling

    Author Photo

    The Administrative Procedure Act’s avenue for universal preliminary relief seems to hold the most promise for neutralizing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA to limit federal district courts' nationally applicable orders, say attorneys at Crowell.

  • Opinion

    Prosecutors' Duty To Justice Sometimes Demands Mea Culpa

    Author Photo

    Two recent cases — U.S. v. Lucas and U.S. v. Echavarria — demonstrate that prosecutors’ special ethical duty to seek justice can sometimes be in tension with other obligations and incentives, but it nonetheless requires them to concede their mistakes in the interests of justice, say Eastern District of Texas law clerk Ian Stephens and Texas A&M University law professor Jemila Lea.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Appellate archive.