Appellate

  • October 30, 2025

    Wash. Justices Debate Judge's Future Amid Court Discord

    The Washington Supreme Court on Thursday asked about the practical effect of returning a suspended municipal judge to the bench, probing whether there's any evidence that Judge Tracy S. Flood and staff of the Bremerton Municipal Court would be able to avoid further discord and subsequent impacts on litigants if she went back to her post.

  • October 30, 2025

    Judge Blasted For Violent Sexual Comments Against Minors

    The Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct has reprimanded a municipal judge for directing sexual remarks at children and wishing sexual violence upon them, noting that the judge exhibited racial bias from the bench.

  • October 30, 2025

    Wash. Justices Doubt Lawyer's Bid For Disbarment Rehearing

    An attorney for a Washington state lawyer facing disbarment for allegedly stealing more than $250,000 in client funds urged the state's highest court Thursday to reverse the disbarment recommendation and order a rehearing in the disciplinary case.

  • October 30, 2025

    Ga. Judges OK Axing Of Atty's Slander Suit Against Ex-Client

    A Georgia appellate panel Thursday backed the dismissal of an attorney's lawsuit against a former client who sued him for legal malpractice, ruling that the complaint boiled down to an abusive litigation claim that couldn't be pursued until the underlying case was complete.

  • October 30, 2025

    NC Justices Asked To Weigh In On Solar Co.'s Insurance Fight

    A solar panel company urged the North Carolina Supreme Court to review its failed attempt to vacate a $1.4 million judgment it was ordered to pay an insurer, arguing that a lower court's opinion unduly narrows rules on vacating default judgments.

  • October 30, 2025

    Defamation Litigation Roundup: Drake, IRS, Greenpeace

    In this month's review of defamation fights, Law360 highlights notable developments in California's anti-SLAPP law following a major Ninth Circuit opinion, as well as a decision — and appeal — in Drake's fight with his record label over Kendrick Lamar's diss track.

  • October 30, 2025

    10th Circ. Tosses Gun Evidence Found On Cop's 'Hunch'

    The Tenth Circuit has ruled that a detective's "hunch" that a shooting suspect was in a car wasn't sufficient grounds to have the vehicle stopped and searched, suppressing evidence of a handgun found in the car.

  • October 30, 2025

    Fed. Circ. Explains Rule While Upholding Merck PTAB Loss

    The Federal Circuit sided with generics makers Thursday and upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's invalidation of claims in two Merck KGaA patents on the blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug Mavenclad, while clarifying how to treat invalidity arguments that involve overlapping inventors.

  • October 30, 2025

    Agri Stats, Pork Producers Push To Pause Price-Fixing Case

    Agri Stats Inc. and pork producers facing an impending trial on allegations that they schemed to limit pork supply and drive up prices are asking a Minnesota federal judge to pause the case while they continue a push for his recusal in the Eighth Circuit.

  • October 30, 2025

    Google Tells Justices Epic Order Makes Court Central Planner

    Google has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to review a case being brought by Epic Games over Google's Play Store policies, telling the justices a sweeping injunction issued in the case defies precedent by turning a court in California into a "central planner" for Android mobile devices.

  • October 30, 2025

    Atty Accused Of Embezzling $2M Can't Avoid GPS Monitoring

    A Boston attorney accused of embezzling nearly $2 million from clients before being arrested en route to Iran must remain monitored while awaiting trial, Massachusetts' highest court ruled Thursday, denying his request to remove his GPS tracking device or expand the area he is allowed to traverse.

  • October 30, 2025

    Conn. Justices Urged To Define 'Written Consent' To Jury Trial

    An investment bank and related companies want Connecticut's Supreme Court to restore their $10.4 million win in a fraud suit after an appellate court overturned a bench trial verdict because it said the parties had agreed to present the case to a jury.

  • October 30, 2025

    J&J's Janssen Says 3rd Circ. Should Reverse $1.6B FCA Win

    Johnson & Johnson's Janssen Products LP urged the Third Circuit to overturn a $1.6 billion False Claims Act judgment over two of its HIV drugs, arguing the district court allowed whistleblowers to prove fraud based solely on "off-label" marketing rather than any false claim actually submitted to the government.

  • October 30, 2025

    Injury Risk Can't Support Toxic Tort Claims, Colo. Court Finds

    A Colorado appeals court on Thursday affirmed the dismissal of a proposed class action by a man living near a Terumo BCT Inc. sterilization facility, finding that the trial court correctly found that his claim of a potential future illness from exposure to toxic chemicals isn't an injury that confers standing.

  • October 30, 2025

    Verizon Fights USPTO Bid To Block Fed. Circ. Patent Appeal

    Verizon has shot back at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's argument that the Federal Circuit can't hear its appeal of former acting Director Coke Morgan Stewart's decision to wipe out a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision in the company's favor invalidating an Omega Patents patent.

  • October 30, 2025

    Copyright Rules For AI Creations Too Strict, IP Panel Says

    The U.S. Copyright Office's rule barring registration of works created entirely by artificial intelligence systems may be overly strict and unlikely to endure, according to a panel of legal experts who discussed the matter Wednesday at the American Intellectual Property Law Association's annual conference in D.C.

  • October 30, 2025

    Gun Rights Groups Ask Justices To Review Ban On Pot Users

    A group of gun rights advocates urged the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a case arguing that a federal law prohibiting marijuana users from owning guns runs afoul of the Second Amendment, saying a similar case the justices agreed to hear is a poor vehicle for the issue.

  • October 30, 2025

    Mich. Justices To Mull If Closed-Door Pot Meetings Broke Law

    Michigan's highest court has agreed to review a lower court's ruling that a city violated state open meetings law when it held closed-door meetings to evaluate the applicants for a limited pool of marijuana business licenses.

  • October 30, 2025

    NJ Panel Backs Tossing Of Fraud Suit In Industrial Lease Row

    A New Jersey state appeals court on Thursday rejected a container loading company's bids for a revival of its permanently dismissed suit, which accused a landlord of leasing a poorly maintained property.

  • October 30, 2025

    Cox Wants Justices To Erase ISP Liability Verdict

    Internet service provider Cox asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to vacate a $1 billion jury verdict holding it liable for its customers' illegal music downloads, saying it never took an affirmative action to further any infringement as would be required under high court precedent.

  • October 30, 2025

    Profs Back Bid At Fed. Circ. To Revive Insulation Patent

    The Federal Circuit should revive an insulation product maker's patent infringement lawsuit against a competitor, according to a pair of legal scholars who say third-party sales of a product by themselves can't block inventors from patenting their creations.

  • October 30, 2025

    McCarter & English Used Doctrine As 'Whipsaw,' Panel Hears

    A biotech company on Thursday urged a New Jersey appellate panel to revive its legal malpractice suit against McCarter & English LLP, arguing that the claims were distinct from the firm's own suit seeking unpaid fees.

  • October 30, 2025

    Nev. Justices Say State Law Isn't Intertwined With FLSA

    Nevada wage and hour laws don't incorporate the Fair Labor Standards Act's exceptions addressing whether preshift work is compensable, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a case by a former Amazon fulfillment center associate alleging the e-commerce giant failed to pay workers for time spent in coronavirus screenings.

  • October 30, 2025

    Fla. Attys Face Stricter Penalty For Settling Dead Client's Case

    The Florida Supreme Court justices on Thursday said they favored a three-year suspension for two attorneys facing ethics charges, rejecting a recommended 18-month penalty for settling a client's case after he died. 

  • October 30, 2025

    Suspended NC Atty Fights Disbarment Bid Over Tax Issues

    A North Carolina attorney currently serving a five-year suspension for misconduct, including tax crimes and commingling funds in a client trust account, is fighting the state bar's appeal seeking to disbar him, telling the state's intermediate appeals court that his failure to withhold income taxes from his own wages is not a crime.

Expert Analysis

  • 7 Document Review Concepts New Attorneys Need To Know

    Author Photo

    For new associates joining firms this fall, stepping into the world of e-discovery can feel like learning a new language, but understanding a handful of fundamentals — from coding layouts to metadata — can help attorneys become fluent in document review, says Ann Motl at Bowman and Brooke.

  • FTC Actions Highlight New Noncompete Enforcement Strategy

    Author Photo

    Several recent noncompete-related actions from the Federal Trade Commission — including its recent dismissal of cases appealing the vacatur of a Biden-era noncompete ban — reflect the commission's shift toward case-by-case enforcement, while confirming that the agency intends to remain active in policing such agreements, say attorneys at Debevoise.

  • NY Laundering Ruling Leans On Jurisdictional Fundamentals

    Author Photo

    A New York appeals court’s recent dismissal of Zhakiyanov v. Ogai, a civil money laundering dispute between Kazakh citizens involving New York real estate, points toward limitations on the jurisdictional reach of state courts and suggests that similar claims will be subject to a searching forum analysis, say attorneys at Curtis Mallet-Prevost.

  • Ruling On Labor Peace Law Marks Shift For Cannabis Cos.

    Author Photo

    Currently on appeal to the Ninth Circuit, an Oregon federal court’s novel decision in Casala v. Kotek, invalidating a state law that requires labor peace agreements as a condition of cannabis business licensure, marks the potential for compliance uncertainty for all cannabis employers in states with labor peace mandates, say attorneys at Sheppard Mullin.

  • Fed. Circ. Rulings Refine Patent Claim Construction Standards

    Author Photo

    Four Federal Circuit patent decisions this year clarify several crucial principles governing patent claim construction, including the importance of prosecution history, and the need for error-free, precise language from claims drafters, say attorneys at Taft.

  • Opinion

    Congress Must Resolve PSLRA Issue For Section 11 Litigants

    Author Photo

    By establishing a uniform judgment reduction credit for all defendants in cases involving Section 11 of the Securities Act, Congress could remove unnecessary statutory ambiguity from the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and enable litigants to price potential settlements with greater certainty, say attorneys at Sidley.

  • Agentic AI Puts A New Twist On Attorney Ethics Obligations

    Author Photo

    As lawyers increasingly use autonomous artificial intelligence agents, disciplinary authorities must decide whether attorney responsibility for an AI-caused legal ethics violation is personal or supervisory, and firms must enact strong policies regarding agentic AI use and supervision, says Grace Wynn at HWG.

  • Series

    Being A Professional Wrestler Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Pursuing my childhood dream of being a professional wrestler has taught me important legal career lessons about communication, adaptability, oral advocacy and professionalism, says Christopher Freiberg at Midwest Disability.

  • Patent Claim Lessons From Fed. Circ.'s Teva Decision

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Janssen v. Teva is an important precedent for parties drafting patent claims or litigating obviousness where the prior art has potentially overlapping ranges for a claimed element, and may be particularly instructive to patent applicants in the pharmaceutical field, say attorneys at Cooley.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Adapting To The Age Of AI

    Author Photo

    Though law school may not have specifically taught us how to use generative artificial intelligence to help with our daily legal tasks, it did provide us the mental building blocks necessary for adapting to this new technology — and the judgment to discern what shouldn’t be automated, says Pamela Dorian at Cozen O'Connor.

  • Ch. 11 Ruling Voiding $2M Litigation Funding Sends A Warning

    Author Photo

    A recent Texas bankruptcy court decision that a postconfirmation litigation trust has no obligations to repay a completely drawn down $2 million litigation funding agreement serves as a warning for estate administrators and funders to properly disclose the intended financing, say attorneys at Kleinberg Kaplan.

  • A Changing Playbook For Fighting Records Requests In Del.

    Author Photo

    The Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in Wong v. Amazon, reversing the denial of an inspection demand brought by a stockholder, serves as a stark warning to corporations challenging books and records requests, making clear that companies cannot defeat such demands solely by attacking the scope of their stated purpose, say attorneys at Duane Morris.

  • Demystifying The Civil Procedure Rules Amendment Process

    Author Photo

    Every year, an advisory committee receives dozens of proposals to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, most of which are never adopted — but a few pointers can help maximize the likelihood that an amendment will be adopted, says Josh Gardner at DLA Piper.

  • How The 5th, DC Circuits Agreed On FCC Forfeiture Orders

    Author Photo

    The Fifth and D.C. Circuits split this year on the Federal Communications Commission's process for adjudicating enforcement actions, but both implicitly recognized the problem with penalizing a party based on a forfeiture order that has not yet been challenged in any way in court, says Jared Marx at HWG.

  • With Obligor Ruling, Ohio Justices Calm Lending Waters

    Author Photo

    A recent decision by the Ohio Supreme Court, affirming a fundamental principle that lenders have no duty to disclose material risks to obligors, provides clarity for commercial lending practices in Ohio and beyond, and offers a reminder of the risks presented by guarantee arrangements, says Carrie Brosius at Vorys.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Appellate archive.