Retroactive Cover Poses Existential Threat, Reinsurer Warns

By Martin Croucher
Law360 is providing free access to its coronavirus coverage to make sure all members of the legal community have accurate information in this time of uncertainty and change. Use the form below to sign up for any of our weekly newsletters. Signing up for any of our section newsletters will opt you in to the weekly Coronavirus briefing.

Sign up for our Insurance UK newsletter

You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:

Select more newsletters to receive for free [+] Show less [-]

Thank You!



Law360, London (April 23, 2020, 2:50 PM BST) -- Claims for interrupted business arising from the coronavirus lockdown could pose an "existential threat" to the insurance industry if regulators forced companies to provide cover retrospectively, Wills Re warned on Thursday.

The estimated $800 billion in capital reserves held by insurers would be depleted "within days" by compensating U.S. businesses for losses incurred during government-imposed lockdowns, the reinsurance arm of London-based broker Willis Towers Watson said.

The warning comes after lawmakers in several U.S. states proposed that all standard policies for business interruption should be retrospectively amended to provide cover for small companies forced to close as a result of the pandemic.

"Passing such legislation would shatter the industry, pushing into insolvency the very insurers compelled to pay the COVID-19 claims," Wills Re said in a report. "This action represents an existential threat to the entire industry, never mind the consequences of unilaterally changing contract law."

Reinsurers will still face pressure from both sides from elevated claims and volatility in the investment markets even if the proposals are not taken up, Willis Re said.

"With uncertainty on both sides of the balance sheet, a capital squeeze is becoming increasingly likely," James Kent, global chief executive for Willis Re, said.

European reinsurer Swiss Re said last month it faced a $250 million hit from the cancellation of the Tokyo Olympics and "mid-three-digit" exposures from other canceled events.

But Willis Re said Thursday that reinsurance claims are likely to be manageable, barring a "worst case scenario." Even if the most claims for event cancellation had to be picked up by reinsurers they would wipe out only 1% of the global capital base — equivalent to a midsized hurricane.

Willis Re cautioned that the impact on the industry would depend on the length and severity of the pandemic and its effect on the global economy.

The broker said at the start of the month that many reinsurers had introduced introduced exclusions over coronavirus at April renewals, a measure that was "by no means universally accepted" by insurers.

--Editing by Ed Harris.

For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!