Philip Morris Says BAT's E-Cig Patent Obvious, Not Infringed

Law360, London (February 11, 2021, 9:39 PM GMT) -- Two Philip Morris International units wrapped their intellectual property case against a pair of British American Tobacco subsidiaries Thursday by arguing their popular electronic cigarette system doesn't infringe the rival's patent, which they say should be invalidated in light of an earlier invention.

The High Court trial is focused on a patent owned by a BAT subsidiary for a reusable electrical device that heats tobacco instead of burning it like traditional cigarettes.

The earlier, 1993 invention, known as "Morgan," was also for a "heat-not-burn" electronic cigarette. Therefore, it would have been within the common general knowledge for someone skilled in the industry...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!