California

  • March 25, 2026

    Cognizant Must Face Clorox's $380M Suit Over Login Sharing

    A California state judge has trimmed Clorox's $380 million lawsuit accusing the cybersecurity company Cognizant of enabling a "catastrophic" 2023 cyberattack by voluntarily handing over Clorox employee passwords after hackers merely asked for them, tossing an intentional misrepresentation claim but keeping the bulk of the suit alive.

  • March 25, 2026

    Uber Has Duty Of Safety Under NC Law, Passenger Claims

    Uber is "obviously" a transportation company providing rides to the public and therefore can be held liable when its drivers sexually assault customers, a passenger told the California federal court overseeing the sprawling multidistrict litigation, urging the court not to fall for the company's "misdirection."

  • March 25, 2026

    Extreme Networks Must Face Suit Over COVID-Era Demand

    A California federal judge rejected Extreme Networks' bid to dismiss a suit alleging it misled investors about its financial prospects and declining client demand during the COVID-19 pandemic, saying the investors adequately pled that the cloud network equipment company engaged in a scheme to inflate revenues through so-called channel-stuffing.

  • March 25, 2026

    Truck Makers Say Calif. Can't Ditch 'Clean Trucks' Pact Suit

    Heavy-duty truck manufacturers have told a California federal judge that state officials cannot be allowed to circumvent federal law and saddle manufacturers with stringent emissions standards and stiff penalties for noncompliance, saying the Golden State's regulations are unequivocally preempted.

  • March 25, 2026

    Anime Biz Allowed Breach Of 6.8M Email Addresses, Suit Says

    An anime streaming service's inadequate data security allowed hackers to gain access to an alleged 6.8 million unique email addresses and exfiltrate other personal information of subscribers, according to a proposed class action in California federal court.

  • March 25, 2026

    Meta Gets Class Suit Over Scam Investment Ads Axed, For Now

    A California federal judge dismissed a proposed class action against Meta over ads on its platforms from scammers impersonating financial professionals to run pump-and-dump investment schemes, saying unlike recent cases that could "disrobe" Meta of immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the plaintiffs didn't allege Meta co-created the ads.

  • March 25, 2026

    Estate Says OpenAI Suicide Suit Distinct From Murder Suit

    The estate of a man who murdered his mother and died by suicide allegedly because of his use of ChatGPT is urging a California federal court not to dismiss its suit against OpenAI, saying the suit doesn't run parallel to a state court case from the mother's estate.

  • March 25, 2026

    Impossible Foods Owes Marketer $3.25M In TM Suit, Jury Says

    A California federal jury on Tuesday awarded a marketing firm owned by a self-described "digital nomad" damages totaling $3.25 million, including $1.75 million in punitive damages, after finding Monday that plant-based burger maker Impossible Foods Inc. willfully infringed its "Impossible" marks, according to counsel.

  • March 25, 2026

    Ramey, EscapeX Ask Justices To Review Sanctions Challenge

    EscapeX IP and its attorney William Ramey III want the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit's decision backing $255,000 in fees and sanctions for what a California federal judge found to be a frivolous patent suit against Google.

  • March 25, 2026

    Dropbox's CLO Made $5.9M In 2025, More Than $5M In Stock

    In 2025, the year that William Yoon became Dropbox's chief legal officer, he took home more than $5 million in stock awards, or over 11 times his base salary for that year, the company has disclosed in a securities filing.

  • March 25, 2026

    Groups Say Miner, Nonprofit Forum Shop In Chuckwalla Suit

    A group of California tribes and conservation nonprofits is accusing a Michigan miner and the BlueRibbon Coalition of venue shopping in their challenge to the establishment of the Chuckwalla National Monument, arguing that the case should be transferred to a district "with an actual stake in the suit."

  • March 25, 2026

    9th Circ. Orders BIA To Reconsider Family's Asylum Claims

    An immigration appeals board must reconsider a Guatemalan family's asylum applications after the mother said she feared the Guatemalan government wouldn't protect them from her brother, the Ninth Circuit ruled, finding the board may have failed to assess "key" evidence.

  • March 25, 2026

    Jury Doubles Damages Against Meta, Google In LA Bellwether

    A California state jury that found Meta and Google liable Wednesday for harming the mental health of a woman who says she became addicted to their social media platforms as a child delivered a second blow later in the day, awarding $3 million in punitive damages on top of a $3 million compensatory award.

  • March 25, 2026

    Justices Reject Tolling For Supervised Release Absconders

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the fugitive tolling doctrine, which prevents criminal defendants from earning credits to reduce prison sentences while they are not behind bars, cannot also be used to automatically penalize defendants who abscond from supervised release.

  • March 24, 2026

    Kinder Morgan Is An Anomaly, NLRB Tells En Banc 9th Circ.

    A National Labor Relations Board attorney urged an en banc Ninth Circuit to overrule a 6-year-old precedent that recognized a "work preservation" defense for unions accused of unlawfully pressuring an employer for disputed work, saying there was good reason that "no other case" ever applied the defense.

  • March 24, 2026

    Pentagon 'Punishing' Anthropic Would Be Illegal, Judge Says

    A California federal judge considering Anthropic's request to block the U.S. Department of Defense from labeling it a supply chain national security risk said Tuesday that it looks like the government is "punishing" Anthropic for bringing public attention to their contract fight, a move that would violate the First Amendment.

  • March 24, 2026

    Ex-Calif. Judge Censured After Guilty Plea For Mail Fraud

    A former California state judge has been censured after agreeing to resign and plead guilty to a felony fraud charge related to an incident that happened before he was on the bench, according to an order released Tuesday.

  • March 24, 2026

    Meta Tackles Borrowed Underwear Analogy In Privacy Suit

    A California federal judge mulling Meta's argument that its users' consent bars a proposed privacy class action pressed Meta's lawyers Tuesday on whether social expectations affect the bounds of that consent, observing that if she gave a friend permission to borrow her clothes, "I don't expect her to borrow my underwear."

  • March 24, 2026

    Wayfair's 30-Day Return Policy Is Misleading, Shopper Says

    Wayfair deploys a misleading 30-day return policy for merchandise sold on its website without conspicuously disclosing at the checkout page that some items are not returnable, leading shoppers to make their purchasing decisions under false impressions, according to a false advertising suit filed Monday in a California state court.

  • March 24, 2026

    AI Tools May 'Disrobe' Meta Of Section 230 Shield, Judge Says

    A California federal judge trimmed Tuesday a proposed class action alleging Meta Platforms Inc. knowingly participated in a Chinese pump-and-dump scheme advertised on social media, but found there's a factual dispute over whether Meta's AI tools materially contributed to the "facially ridiculous" ads.

  • March 24, 2026

    Judge Extends Halt On Trump Admin's College Data Demand

    A Massachusetts federal judge on Tuesday again extended a deadline for colleges and universities to comply with a Trump administration demand for seven years of race and gender admissions data while he considers the scope of an anticipated preliminary injunction that would shield public schools in 17 states.

  • March 24, 2026

    Justices Hunt For 'Magic' Border Line In Asylum Turnback Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday wrestled with when a noncitizen "arrives in" the U.S., but struggled to pin down whether someone's foot, hand or nose must cross a "magic" line that would obligate border officials to process them.

  • March 24, 2026

    Drug Co. Atara Hit With Investor Suit Over FDA Denial

    Drug company Atara Biotherapeutics Inc. has been hit with a proposed class action accusing it of harming investors by not disclosing certain manufacturing problems and research study deficiencies that made it unlikely the U.S. Food and Drug Administration would approve its new drug application.

  • March 24, 2026

    Publishers Say Anthropic's Use Of Lyrics Violates Copyrights

    Music publishers have asked a California federal judge to rule that Anthropic infringed their copyrighted song lyrics through its Claude large language model, arguing in a motion for partial summary judgment that fair use does not excuse the AI developer's conduct because it used those lyrics to build a competing commercial product.

  • March 24, 2026

    DoorDash's Zesty AI Food App Copies Rival Zest, Suit Says

    Artificial intelligence-driven food discovery platform Zest Maps Inc. says DoorDash has launched its own AI-powered app called Zesty, which also includes lemon imagery, infringing Zest's name and design and causing consumer confusion, according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday in California federal court.

Expert Analysis

  • Opinion

    California Vapor Intrusion Policy Should Focus On Site Risks

    Author Photo

    As California environmental regulators consider whether to change the attenuation factor used in screenings for vapor intrusion, the most prudent path forward is to keep the current value for screening purposes, while using site-specific, risk-based numbers for cleanup and closure targets, says Thierry Montoya at Frost Brown.

  • 9th Circ. Ruling Upholds Employee Speech Amid Stalled NLRB

    Author Photo

    The Ninth Circuit's recent decision in National Labor Relations Board v. North Mountain Foothills Apartments shows that courts are enforcing National Labor Relations Act protections despite the board's current paralysis, so employers must tread carefully when disciplining employee speech, whether at work or online, say attorneys at Foley & Lardner.

  • Series

    Preaching Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Becoming a Gospel preacher has enhanced my success as a trial lawyer by teaching me the importance of credibility, relatability, persuasiveness and thorough preparation for my congregants, the same skills needed with judges and juries in the courtroom, says Reginald Harris at Stinson.

  • And Now A Word From The Panel: A New Rule For MDLs

    Author Photo

    With a new federal rule of civil procedure dedicated to multidistrict litigation practice taking effect this month, MDL watchers will be keeping on eye on whether the rule effectively serves its purpose of ensuring that only supportable claims proceed in MDLs, says Alan Rothman at Sidley.

  • State, Federal Incentives Heat Up Geothermal Projects

    Author Photo

    Geothermal energy can now benefit from dramatically accelerated permitting for development on federal land as well as state-level renewable energy portfolio standards — but operating in the complex legal framework surrounding geothermal projects requires successful navigation of complex water rights and environmental regulations, say attorneys at Holland & Hart.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Practicing Client-Led Litigation

    Author Photo

    New litigators can better help their corporate clients achieve their overall objectives when they move beyond simply fighting for legal victory to a client-led approach that resolves the legal dispute while balancing the company's competing out-of-court priorities, says Chelsea Ireland at Cohen Ziffer.

  • 9th Circ. Robinhood Ruling May Alter Intraquarter Disclosures

    Author Photo

    By aligning with the Second Circuit and rejecting the First Circuit's extreme-departure standard, the Ninth Circuit recently signaled in its decision to revive a putative securities class action against Robinhood a renewed emphasis on transparency when known trends that can be considered material arise between quarterly reports, say attorneys at MoFo.

  • Florida Throws A Wrench Into Interstate Trucking Torts

    Author Photo

    Florida's recent request to file a bill of complaint in the U.S. Supreme Court against California and Washington, asserting that the states' policies conflict with the federal English language proficiency standard for truck drivers, transforms a conventional wrongful death case into a high-stakes constitutional challenge, say attorneys at Farah & Farah.

  • Series

    The Law Firm Merger Diaries: How To Build On Cultural Fit

    Author Photo

    Law firm mergers should start with people, then move to strategy: A two-level screening that puts finding a cultural fit at the pinnacle of the process can unearth shared values that are instrumental to deciding to move forward with a combination, says Matthew Madsen at Harrison.

  • Mulling Differing Circuit Rulings On Gender-Affirming Care

    Author Photo

    Despite the Eleventh Circuit's recent holding in Lange v. Houston County that a health plan's exclusion for gender-affirming surgery did not violate Title VII, employers should be mindful of other court decisions suggesting that different legal challenges may still apply to blanket exclusions for such care, say attorneys at Smith Gambrell.

  • Ending All-In Airfare Pricing Could Pose Ad Dilemma For Cos.

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Department of Transportation's plan to scrap its requirement that airfare ads include all fees and taxes in price listings means that airlines, travel agents and other affected businesses must balance competitive pricing against the risk of alienating consumers, say Kimberly Graber at Steptoe and Serena Viswanathan, formerly at the FTC's Division of Advertising Practices.

  • Considerations When Invoking The Common-Interest Privilege

    Author Photo

    To successfully leverage the common-interest doctrine in a multiparty transaction or complex litigation, practitioners should be able to demonstrate that the parties intended for it to apply, that an underlying privilege like attorney-client has attached, and guard against disclosures that could waive privilege and defeat its purpose, say attorneys at DLA Piper.

  • NBA Gambling Probes Highlight Sports Betting's Broad Risks

    Author Photo

    Recent NBA gambling scandals illustrate the integrity risks arising from legal sports betting, but organizations, which must navigate a patchwork of state laws, can protect their reputations by drafting and enforcing internal policies to address betting-related risks and complying with league and institutional rules, say attorneys at Littler.

  • How Marsy's Law Has Been Applied In Unexpected Ways

    Author Photo

    Since Marsy’s Law was first passed in California 17 years ago, 12 states have passed similar laws to protect crime victims’ rights, but recent developments show that it’s being applied in ways that its original proponents may never have anticipated — with implications for all legal practitioners, says Tom Jones at Berk Brettler.

  • Series

    The Law Firm Merger Diaries: Making The Case To Combine

    Author Photo

    When making the decision to merge, law firm leaders must factor in strategic alignment, cultural compatibility and leadership commitment in order to build a compelling case for combining firms to achieve shared goals and long-term success, says Kevin McLaughlin at UB Greensfelder.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the California archive.