The Ninth Circuit ruled Monday that the Trump administration's policy restricting asylum for migrants who cross through another country on the way to the U.S. is illegal, marking the second court decision to strike down the restrictions in under a week.
Uber Technologies Inc. plans to buy private equity-backed Postmates Inc. for roughly $2.65 billion, in a deal announced Monday that heats up competition in the online food delivery industry and was steered by Wachtell Lipton and Latham & Watkins.
We're pleased to announce Law360's Rising Stars for 2020, our list of 176 attorneys under 40 whose legal accomplishments transcend their age.
Health insurance plan purchasers seeking $489 million from Sutter Health on claims they overpaid because the hospital chain violated antitrust laws told a California federal judge during a hearing Thursday that their renewed class certification bid isn't doomed by a dispute over calculating damages.
A California state judge has given a preliminary thumbs-up to a $78 million settlement that would resolve outstanding claims by a certified class of about 450 medical flight crew workers accusing helicopter operator Air Methods Corp. of committing various wage violations.
Grammy Award-winning composer Maria Schneider hit YouTube with a putative class action in California federal court Thursday alleging it facilitates a "hotbed" of copyright infringement through its enforcement system, which she said only protects major studios and record labels and abandons "ordinary creators" like her.
A motor carrier owner working for Ryder System Inc. urged a California federal judge Wednesday to sign off on a proposed $5 million class settlement to resolve claims that Ryder misclassified delivery workers as independent contractors to avoid paying all wages and job-related expenses.
A Chinese tycoon and founder of electric car startup Faraday Future reported a successful emergence Thursday from a personal Chapter 11 in California that briefly detoured through Delaware bankruptcy court, following confirmation of a more than $3.5 billion reorganization.
Portola Pharmaceuticals pushed a California federal judge to toss a proposed class action accusing the company of misstating the actual market value of its blood coagulant, Andexxa, arguing there is no evidence it misled its shareholders.
Travelers Property Casualty Co. has asked a California federal court to nix a flower importers' suit over their $2 million COVID-19-induced property loss insurance claims, arguing that the importers' insurance policy excludes coverage of the consequences of the government's decisions.
Facebook screens out Black job applicants and routinely relies on peer reviews by its overwhelmingly white and Asian American workforce to unfairly deny promotions to its few Black employees, according to a class action race bias charge filed Thursday with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Apple recently hit back against a proposed class action claiming it hid display defects on 15-inch MacBook Pro laptops, saying the suit is based on a false assumption on the design and can't be backed by facts.
A string of federal courts have paused consumer class actions against CBD companies until the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issues long-anticipated rules governing the products, but litigants say the regulations, once finalized, are unlikely to resolve any of the issues raised by the cases.
The former chief financial officer of pot giant MedMen is asking a California state court to award him more than $600,000 in attorney fees midway through a bitter legal fight over his departure, saying his contract entitles him to reimbursement for the litigation.
The Ninth Circuit has mostly affirmed a ruling ordering several companies to pay the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission more than $14 million after the agency accused them of participating in a fraud scheme involving Federal Communications Commission cellular spectrum licenses.
A California woman received a two-year sentence for defrauding four Iranian nationals out of $120,000 with false promises that she could secure them American immigration benefits, including green cards and citizenship, the Justice Department has announced.
American travelers are uncertain of what rights they have when border agents ask to search their cellphones, especially after conflicting rulings from circuit courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court may be the only forum where travelers can get certainty.
Grocery delivery service Instacart is suing to block a Seattle ordinance requiring coronavirus hazard pay for gig delivery workers, New York police officers and Las Vegas resort workers claim they haven't been provided with adequate protections during the pandemic, and the ACLU says California courts can't block public access to trials, despite the virus.
A coalition of states, including California and Massachusetts, criticized the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's proposal to update incentives for transmission projects, saying it doesn't do much to reduce the amount consumers must pay or help the right kinds of projects.
The Federal Circuit has upheld a California federal judge's 2019 ruling that four Data Scape Ltd. patents covering a method for transferring music files from one device to another are invalid under Alice.
An environmental group hoping to hold Nestle, PepsiCo, Clorox and others accountable for plastic pollution along California's coastline has slammed the companies' attempts to try the case in federal court, saying they have mischaracterized its state-specific arguments as national or international issues.
White & Case and Hogan Lovells were among more than a dozen firms that helped with the 10 largest real estate mergers and acquisitions deals of the second quarter, five of which were north of the $1 billion mark.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear a challenge to an en banc Ninth Circuit decision that barred employers from using workers' salary history to justify sex-based pay disparities.
A California state appellate court reported an attorney to the state's bar association after determining he engaged in real estate fraud to avoid paying a judgment of over $900,000 for charging a former client excessive fees.
U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal said Wednesday it may be high time to scrutinize sports labor antitrust exemptions, with the NCAA urging Congress to give it a pass from antitrust scrutiny as it works to reform its rules restricting college athletes from profiting from the use of their names, images and likenesses.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's recently settled enforcement action against Ares Management demonstrates that private fund managers with potential insider info should systematically investigate trading approvals in situations that present a heightened risk of access to material nonpublic information, say attorneys at Debevoise.
Although public agencies have issued a broad range of orders intended to slow the spread of COVID-19, they are likely safe from temporary takings claims due to the high hurdles for such claims and the expanded police powers granted to governments during public health emergencies, say Gene Tanaka and Emily Chaidez at Best Best.
The California Court of Appeal's recent ruling in Shaeffer v. Califia Farms — holding that a company's claims about its product did not imply false claims about other companies' products — provides an important framework that food manufacturers can use to dispose of similar cases at the pleading stage, say attorneys at Covington.
It has long been the law that attorneys cannot use percentage rental agreements because doing so would constitute an impermissible sharing of fees with nonlawyers, but such arrangements can help lawyers match expenses with revenues in lean times like now, say Peter Jarvis and Trisha Thompson at Holland & Knight.
While there is little precedent for dealing with employee vacation requests during a pandemic, companies can protect workers by carefully asking about travel plans, and following public health agency and local guidelines when advising employees to self-isolate, say attorneys at Baker McKenzie.
A win for municipalities suing the California Bureau of Cannabis Control in an upcoming trial this month would likely lead to an increase in black-market services by disallowing legal statewide marijuana delivery, say Michael Rosenblum and Lauren Chee at Thompson Coburn.
The applicability of the U.S. Supreme Court's 1983 Associated General Contractors indirect purchaser price-fixing decision to antitrust standing under state law continues to evolve, with some decisions that may portend diminished application, say Chris Micheletti and James Dugan at Zelle.
The reasoning of the Ninth Circuit's Altera v. Commissioner decision — which the U.S. Supreme Court recently declined to review — could provide state tax authorities with an argument for additional discretion when challenging transfer pricing arrangements between affiliated entities, say attorneys at Eversheds Sutherland.
While the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Seila Law this week leaves the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau standing, the CFPB's director now lacks protection from presidential termination, which brings uncertainty regarding the status of past actions taken by bureau directors who were "unconstitutionally insulated" from termination, says Eric Mogilnicki at Covington.
Automotive companies procuring from new sources because of the pandemic or adapting to new requirements of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement can minimize their compliance risks by implementing full-spectrum, know-your-source due diligence and documenting every aspect of their vetting process, say Gregory Husisian and Jenlain Scott at Foley & Lardner.
A California state appellate court's recent decision in Masellis v. Law Office of Leslie F. Jensen provides a road map for proving causation and damages in settle-and-sue legal malpractice cases — an important issue of long-standing confusion, says Steven Berenson at Klinedinst.
While courts have been reluctant to grant discovery in Employee Retirement Income Security Act benefits cases in the past, textual-minded judges questioning the legitimacy of judicially created doctrines are increasingly allowing more discovery, says Mark DeBofsky at DeBofsky Sherman.
Restrictive covenants in employment agreements will face greater scrutiny from courts if high unemployment persists, but the analysis will depend on whether the company aims to protect trade secrets, client relationships or its interest in unique employees, says Reid Skibell at Harris St. Laurent.
If California voters support the California Privacy Rights Act in November, it will become a permanent baseline for California privacy law, increase the already demanding requirements of the California Consumer Privacy Act, and potentially redefine informational privacy for the entire U.S., say Lauren Kitces and Lydia de la Torre at Squire Patton.
Mediation conducted online with participants in different states makes it harder to determine where communications were made, increasing the risk that courts will apply laws of a state that does not protect mediation confidentiality, say mediators Jeff Kichaven and Teresa Frisbie and law student Tyler Codina.