A coalition of entertainment goliaths including Disney, Amazon, Columbia and Universal teamed up in an anti-piracy suit filed Friday in California federal court, alleging a "brazen" internet-based streaming service called Nitro TV is stealing their copyrighted content.
A California federal judge on Friday reduced a $50.4 million antitrust judgment against a Chinese telescope maker by $3.1 million, but awarded the rival plaintiff's counsel $4.7 million in fees and costs, pointing to the fact that Sheppard Mullin's defense bill was roughly twice the amount.
A California federal judge ordered Lyft Inc. to provide detailed information about its efforts to help drivers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic Friday, a day after he called out the ride-hailing company's disregard for the law and questioned whether Lyft drivers were using the crisis "as a hook to get a court ruling."
Ericsson and Chinese smartphone maker TCL will sort out their dispute over licensing rates for TCL's standard-essential wireless patents at trial, after a California federal judge said the Federal Circuit’s remand of the case “unraveled” his entire judgment.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission told a California federal judge that a boutique law firm is trying to get $3 million in fees from the receivership estate for an EB-5 investment fraud scheme simply for getting the receiver appointed.
A California federal judge on Thursday sanctioned a Chinese hospital’s former owner for failing to produce documents investors want to use in a $20 million arbitration and foreign litigation in China claiming they were unlawfully pushed out of an in vitro fertilization clinic project.
The Federal Circuit vacated a Northern District of California summary judgment win for computer maker Acer America Corp. on allegations it misappropriated trade secrets from Intellisoft, ruling Friday the case should never have been removed to federal court.
Buyers accusing generic-drug makers of price-fixing urged a Pennsylvania federal judge Thursday to accept a special master’s recommendation and pick a lawsuit by states as their bellwether conspiracy case, pushing back against Teva Pharmaceuticals' objection to the special master's choice.
The Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit has suspended Speedy Trial Act rules in the Southern District of California, extending the deadline requiring criminal trials to occur within 70 days to within 180 days, prompting concerns by attorneys for immigrants who are being detained without bond.
Kingston Technology Co. Inc. has told a California federal judge that Pavo Solutions LLC's bid to triple a $7.5 million jury award for infringing a USB patent is based on "outlandish accusations and over-the-top rhetoric," so it should either pay a much smaller amount or escape the verdict altogether.
A California state appeals court has ordered a new trial on whether a production company is liable for a former college cheerleader's injury during rehearsal for a film about the exploitation of women in cheerleading, tossing the cheerleader's $2.6 million trial win because the jury wasn’t given a crucial instruction.
In this installment of Coronavirus Q&A, the health practice chair at O'Melveny & Myers LLP discusses a whirlwind effort with California's governor to rapidly revitalize bankrupt hospitals, looming litigation between health insurers and providers over coronavirus costs, and a potential wave of whistleblower suits involving pandemic-related billing and stimulus funds.
The privacy backlash that has accompanied Zoom's meteoric rise since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has sparked challenges that are poised to test the strength of California's new privacy law and fuel calls for other states to embrace robust data safeguards.
Cryptocurrency company Blockvest LLC and its founder have urged a California federal judge to reject a bid for summary judgment by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in a suit alleging it fraudulently advertised that its initial coin offering had the SEC's nod.
McKesson Corp. has sought another dismissal of a shareholder derivative action accusing the company of concealing its involvement in alleged pharmaceutical industry price-fixing, telling a California federal judge that the latest complaint didn't properly address the issues in the old one.
Google has violated state and federal privacy laws by selling and distributing Chromebooks that collect and store students’ facial and voice data, according to a proposed class action filed in California federal court.
Trucking companies battling drivers' no-poach allegations have panned a lead counsel bid by the four firms representing the former employees, arguing the firms are just angling to win the top spot if the suit is combined with a related dispute.
Cigna and UnitedHealth Group's behavioral health services arms have colluded with a cost-containment middleman to cheat patients on payments for out-of-network mental health and addiction treatment and underpay providers, according to a series of new proposed class actions.
Controversial surveillance vendor NSO Group is claiming Facebook tried to monitor some of its own users by buying the same software the social media giant accuses NSO of later using to hack into WhatsApp users' phones, the latest twist in what has become an ugly legal battle.
Delaware's chancellor pressed an attorney for Jefferies Financial Group Friday to explain how its allegedly tainted pre-deal contacts with key HomeFed Corp. minority investors failed to "put the nail in the coffin" of claims that its $189 million take-private merger in mid-2019 deserved business judgment deference.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a complaint in California federal court claiming a Beverly Hills-based entertainment technology company deceived its backers to secure $45 million in a nearly decadelong unregistered securities offering.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP has welcomed back an attorney after a stint at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and K&L Gates LLP nabbed the former managing partner of Haynes and Boone LLP's Chicago office, headlining Law360's latest roundup of personnel moves in the health care and life sciences arena.
The Ninth Circuit on Thursday granted a British immigrant's request to review a Board of Immigration Appeals decision that denied her permanent resident status, saying she can’t be faulted for her lawyer’s mistake that got her stuck in a 14-year-long “bureaucratic nightmare.”
A California federal judge has trimmed a suit alleging a kombucha drink maker owned by Safeway Inc. mislabeled its products, saying while claims related to the drinks' sugar content are "threadbare," the complaint adequately pleads that the labels mislead consumers about their alcohol content.
The California magistrate judge overseeing discovery in a gender discrimination suit against Morrison & Foerster LLP said the firm can demand its accusers’ performance records from Linklaters, where one now heads the U.S. fintech practice, and Freshfields, where the other was an associate.
As automakers respond creatively to the COVID-19 pandemic, they must anticipate and address important performance and quality requirements as they work to quickly transform automotive and others factories for medical device production, say advisers and attorneys at King & Spalding.
With marijuana deemed essential in many states during the COVID-19 crisis, regulators are relaxing prohibitions on cannabis home delivery and curbside pickup services. These short-term fixes could become lasting mainstays, say attorneys at Goodwin.
If the FTC must use its rulemaking authority to regulate employee noncompete agreements, it should tread cautiously and let states make policy decisions for their citizens and economies, say Russell Beck and Erika Hahn of Beck Reed.
State and federal courts are canceling proceedings and pushing out deadlines in response to the novel coronavirus pandemic, but the relief is complex and necessarily incomplete in its power to relieve parties from jurisdictional deadlines, says Neil Lloyd at Schiff Hardin.
Judges have recently rebuked attorneys for wasting judicial resources to resolve minor issues during the COVID-19 crisis, including in a trademark lawsuit over unicorn drawings. But it is unfair to publicly flog lawyers for doing what they are trained to do, says Ronald Minkoff, chairman of Frankfurt Kurnit's professional responsibility group.
A proposed New Jersey bill requiring some commercial property insurance policies to construe the coronavirus pandemic as a covered cause of loss would likely survive a contract clause challenge, but this type of law could set a dangerous precedent, say Linda Hsu and Savannah Montanez at Selman Breitman.
The California Court of Appeal’s recent decision that a company owed former employees unpaid vacation benefits in McPherson v. EF Intercultural Foundation reminds employers to ensure that unlimited time off policies cannot be characterized as a ploy to deny employee benefits, say Anthony Oncidi and Cole Lewis at Proskauer.
While we need to be physically apart at this time, lawyers and firms should be leaning into social media to reinforce and build relationships, and help guide clients through the coronavirus crisis, says marketing consultant Stefanie Marrone.
As COVID-19's effects reverberate throughout the corporate sector, in-house legal departments and their outside counsel will need to develop creative techniques to conduct internal investigations remotely, while ensuring that unanticipated risks do not compromise integrity, say attorneys at Steptoe & Johnson.
The first two decisions applying the Ninth Circuit’s Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin decision indicate that the recent trajectory of music copyright infringement law appears to be changing in favor of defendants, limiting what courts find protectable and what they permit a jury to consider, say attorneys at Proskauer.
Reece Hirsch and Brian London at Morgan Lewis explore when private investment funds and their managers are subject to the California Consumer Privacy Act and similar state laws, when they are exempt, and what they need to do to comply.
As unscrupulous sellers try to take advantage of Americans by selling products at unconscionable prices during the coronavirus pandemic, economists at Edgeworth Economics empirically test whether the prices being charged for goods and services rise to the level of price-gouging as defined by various state laws.
A class action recently filed in Los Angeles Superior Court challenging a music festival's refund policy after a COVID-19-prompted cancellation may indicate the direction that the plaintiffs bar will pursue in pandemic-related consumer litigation, say attorneys at Bryan Cave.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's rebuke of Purell manufacturer Gojo Industries' labeling claims has incited an influx of false advertising class actions against hand sanitizer companies, but there are several viable ways for defendants to respond, says Alex Smith at Jenner & Block.
While COVID-19 has created unprecedented challenges for even commonplace tasks like contract execution, federal and state legal frameworks offer practical alternatives to manual signing, say attorneys at Cleary.