Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
Case Number:
3:12-cv-02389
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Baker & Hostetler
- Berger Montague
- Blank Rome
- Carella Byrne
- Cohen Milstein
- Cohn Lifland
- Connell Foley
- DeBenedictis & DeBenedictis
- Dilworth Paxson
- Duane Morris
- Ferraro Law Firm
- Garwin Gerstein
- Gerard Fox Law
- Glancy Prongay
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Hangley Aronchick
- Kenny Nachwalter
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lite DePalma
- Marcus & Shapira
- Miller Shah LLP
- Napoli Shkolnik
- NastLaw
- Neal & Harwell
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Patunas Law
- Robbins Geller
- Saiber LLC
- Sauder Schelkopf
- Schnader Harrison
- Schoenefeld Law Firm LLC
- Seeger Weiss
- Shub & Johns
- Spiro Harrison
- Walsh Pizzi
- White & Case
Companies
- Cardinal Health Inc.
- CVS Health Corp.
- Daiichi Sankyo Co.
- Fraternal Order of Police
- Giant Eagle Inc.
- H‑E‑B LP
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
- LifeWallet
- Meijer Inc.
- Mylan NV
- Pfizer Inc.
- Ranbaxy
- Rite Aid Corp.
- Rochester Drug Cooperative Inc.
- Safeway Inc.
- Supervalu Inc.
- The Kroger Co.
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 19, 2012
Pfizer Says Lipitor Buyers Can't Bring Antitrust Challenge
Pfizer Inc. sought Friday to end a class action concerning its purportedly anti-competitive settlement resolving patent litigation over Ranbaxy Inc.'s generic challenge to Pfizer's cholesterol drug Lipitor, telling a New Jersey federal court that the drug retailer plaintiffs lack standing to pursue the case.
-
October 25, 2012
Pfizer, Ranbaxy Can't Pause Lipitor Pay-For-Delay Suit
A New Jersey judge has refused to halt multidistrict antitrust litigation challenging patent infringement settlements Pfizer Inc. reached over its cholesterol treatment Lipitor, ruling that waiting for the U.S. Supreme Court to take and decide similar suits over pay-for-delay deals would stall the case too long.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →